I get it, I will try to improve that in the next version

I think this is a great opportunity to debate how to interpret something that is actually signed ( followers, posts, applications, etc.).

For myself, I only interpreted as how the signer is ‘known’ in the community as indicated by who is following them. No endorsement. I recall when we had the spammers, the worst thing you could do is follow a spammer, because it gave them social validation. This is kinda the opposite thing because I am looking for how well the app signer is known.

What’s really cool here is that everything is a signed event. That cannot be denied or debated. What is really up for debate is how things should be presented and interpreted. We’ll figure this out eventually, but it’s way better than groveling for approval and rating from a random App Store technician or algorithm.