WTF is right. Was MH370 the first instance of this tech being used in the wild?
Discussion
They must be doing something super sketchy this week if they're releasing something like this on official channels.
It's a misdirection folks.
Bring Eric Weinstein on TFTC to chop it up.
Weinstein has zero idea about this technology because he subscribes to modern physics. This is aether-based technology, that's why almost all modern physicists cannot comprehend it.
Where can I learn more about this?
I don't know how many hundreds/thousands of hours I have spent so far on this topic.
A basic starting point would be to listen to a credentialed person from NASA explain how the current understanding of physics is completely incorrect because it is based on particles rather than waves and magnetism.
https://youtu.be/SSTltY_NTFM?t=2643
Howard is not good at explaining it IMO, even though they are largely saying the same thing.
There are books on the aether, my starting point was Frank Wilczeks' "The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces".
Fundamentally it takes relearning what magnetism is and how it fits into the scope of aether physics. Once you understand that, then making sense of everything else is a lot easier. Ken Wheeler (Theoria Apophasis on YT) has the most succinct explanations for that, but it takes a long time to form a good understanding, at least in my experience.
If you prefer reading, CP Steinmetz work from the early 1900s is excellent, but quite technical. Steinmetz was the guy who perfected Tesla's AC motor.
Oh boy
I'm open to the idea but Terrace Howard has an alarming rate of false attribution errors.
Like I said, focus on what someone with a background in physics has to say - he speaks for the majority of the 2nd half of the interview.
No one who is up to date on physics thinks it is waves or particles or magnets and definitely not aether. If you still think it is those things you misunderstand or never learned quantum theory.
Quantum theory is a bunch of bullshit. Thank fuck I never learned it.
Most informed high quality rebuttals come from a place of "I ain't never learning that shit"
Knowing it is wrong with 100% certainty while knowing nothing about it makes less sense than quantum entanglement.
I learned about your theory before dismissing you. For example I know that the go to video of the plane disappearing is a fake.
Quantum entanglement only doesn't make sense within the very framework you subscribe to. You know, the one that claims nothing "travels" faster than light. For that to be accurate, light ought to actually be travelling, yet it doesn't.
It's fake, yet your present no evidence for that belief. Interesting.
The tail lettering is legible in some of the footage and is wrong. The footage is from a satellite launched after mh370 disappeared. It was originally posted as a generic aircraft and then later people added the claim it was mh370.
Okay, I'll entertain this. There are two videos. One is thermal so it won't have those details. Here is the other video. Can you point out the tail lettering?
https://video.nostr.build/e72935cc889c3d8f64fefbd83c47d36730dae9a62fe0d70b69cbb9ef3e12a523.mp4
A time and field of view cropped video is missing information from the original? I'm not exactly swayed by that revelation.
Show me where in either of these "fake" videos you can see a tail number. That was your claim after all.
nostr:note13vjdy7834kxdxdtqrnqaahqqptqmkj0xa4gwrrhr6e59vf7jq2hqqgcnle
Dude can't wrap his head around the fact cutting the beginning of the video means information that was in the video won't be there any more. We are wasting our time.
All you had to do was show me where you can find the tail number in the videos.
The video where the beginning of the video shows tail numbers but you shared a version with the beginning of the video cut off?
You must think I believe the 6 finger tittie pics of celebrities that get passed around too.
I looked through dozens of videos, they are all the same. That is literally the beginning of the video. That's why I asked. You think I intentionally shared a clipped version, then find the video you are talking about and post it here. It doesn't exist.
I live in a world with lasers, quantum computers, and atomic clocks all invented based on quantum theory.
Aether theory was formalized twice as long ago as quantum theory.
If aether theory is right and twice as old as quantum theory which is wrong why are there inventions derived from quantum theory but not aether theory?
The foundation of our electric grid is based on aether theory. Had Tesla and Steinmetz subscribed to quantum theory, they would have never made these breakthroughs.
The discovery of electricity, which is modelled as a single unit in conventional (modern) physics rather than a hybrid of magnetism and dielectricity, is literally what underpins lasers and computers, since they could not exist without discovering electricity. Lasers are phase coherent, point source light. Nothing to do with "quantum". Qubits are a conventional description of superposition of states as opposed to binary bits, using particle physics as the foundation. Or, within an aether framework, simply, waves. This is why people can't wrap their heads around the dual slit experiment; their minds are infected with the idea of particles rather than phase interference of waves, so this is explained in the form of a duality rather than the obvious answer.
Atomic clocks work by monitoring resonant frequency. Aether physics posits that there are no particles, only waves. Therefore the physics of atomic clocks is still consistent within an aether framework.
Aether physics was discarded because of the uncomfortable results that would have invalidated these modern theories from michelson-morley and michelson-gail-pearson, in that the aether was detected and moving using interferometric measurements. Tesla rejected the theory of electrons and general relativity, and by his own admission, Einstein didn't operate on the same level as Tesla. The "fuzzy haired crackpot" gave the world nothing but theories, whereas Tesla and Steinmetz gave the world the AC motor on the basis of an aether as the foundation for their work.
Indeed, the insanity of particle physics and quantum (literally quanta, or quantity, trying to quantify that which cannot be quantified) has resulted in most people trying to understand the world through a framework that is illogical at its core.
"Atomic clocks" as sold to you are really GPS clocks. They use calculations of the relative positions and relative times between you and the satellites. An astute rear has already seen it. Before Einstein and quantum theory we could not calculate orbits with the required accuracy, mercury famously was never right. They also use the different experience of time between you on the surface of Earth and the satellite being farther away from its primary source of gravity. Getting the right time also has to account for a difference in time experience based on different speeds between you and the satellite. These are all as Einstein predicted and done using quantum theory math yet you arrive at meetings in time. You not knowing quantum theory movement models are required doesn't make it not so.
Lasers trace their lineage directly to quantum theory. They came from the thought process "based on quantum theory we can probably do this cool new thing and here is how we'd do it" and no cat has lived in peace since.
And dude, michelson-morley disproved aether theory according to Michelson and Morley and every other physicist who looked at it. That is why Einstein was looking for other answers. I was skipping it because I wanted to build my answer using simple logic anyone could understand not go read this study or do these advanced orbital calculations. Aether theory posits directions for the Aether and Michelson-Morley experiment measured for those directions and found that they can only exist if they are always in relation to the observer. Now you and I need different Aethers and they must conflict.
quantum theory is nothing but COPE for the contradiction in the materialists' theory revealed by the double-slit retardation.
rather than admit that their reductionist theories were WRONG, they invented a magic word by misappropriating the term quanta, applying it, unironically, to a concept that can never be actually quantified. 
It isn't a particle, or a wave, or a duality of the two and no one has thought it was for quite some time. Old ass strawmen are easy to knock down though.
It was the first successful use. I wonder where those people went. I think they crashed in another dimension.
Read: Journey of Souls.
Love,
Colin
Yep it totally abolished obliterated destroyed & annihilated any doubt.
(Beware flowery words)
Poorly-worded reference to electronic communication which allows us to circumvent--not manipulate--time and space. That's my 42 sats.
1.) What?
Um no 😂
Theorizing about physics possibilities is not making jets disappear, so no.
Do theories get patents? Asking for a friend
Yes let your friend know it happens all the time, see Apple Computer patents for thousands of examples.
Here’s the ENORMOUS IF that does the heavy lifting in you link:
“If we can engineer the structure of the local quantum vacuum state, we can engineer the fabric of our reality at the most fundamental level (thus affecting a physical system's inertial and gravitational properties). This realization would greatly advance the fields of aerospace propulsion and power generation.”
So again, no, a plane did not disappear because of this….
Where is the plane then?
What is your strongest piece of evidence we did not do this?
The final puzzle peace is for Edward Siraya (Lin) to admit he leaked the predator drone, satellite, and thermal image footage.
Is it EnOrMoUs and hEaVy because you’re unfamiliar? If you care to educate yourself:
1. Winterberg’s Negative Mass Propulsion Paper
• Author: F. Winterberg
• Link: https://t.co/QB2gCtHeev
2. Landis’ Paper on Propulsion
• Author: Geoffrey A. Landis
• Link: https://t.co/3dlfkCzFfM
3. Wormhole DIRD Paper
• Author: Eric Davis
• Link: https://t.co/yUrp4zMqBo
4. Teleportation Physics Study
• Author: Eric Davis
• Link: https://t.co/yUrp4zMqBo
5. Spacetime Metric Engineering DIRD
• Author: Hal Puthoff
• Link: https://t.co/MiwLadDjuH
6. Defense Intelligence Reference Documents (DIRDs)
• Authors: Various (including physicists and engineers, many affiliated with Lockheed Martin)
• Link: https://t.co/JXPVJYgeae
• Additional Link: https://t.co/2h1nZd8zCb (mentioned June 30, 2024)
• Specific DIRD Link: https://t.co/bkpoglP2Pt
Considering their lying rate this is what you chose to believe? Talk about seeking confirmation bias.
Scroll Ashton Forbes’ feed for all the evidence and analysis
I'm not going on xitter and I won't take anyone who considers it a quality source seriously.
Consider the probability of these 2 statements.
1. The government has the ability to manipulate the fabric of spacetime and the only thing they used it for was to thanos blip a single airplane full of nobodies.
2. The government lies to manipulate you.
Your first statement is ignorant because the airplane contained 20 semiconductor engineers that stick out as potential espionage targets. 8 were Chinese Nationals working for American microchip company tied to US Aerospace and Defense.
Are you saying any content or link where on X is illegitimate? That is extremely intellectually lazy and retarded.
You’ve demonstrated you don’t know what you’re talking about.
I'm absolutely saying that if the only source you have is X that is a low quality source and I have better things to do with my time.
Even with those people on board, it still fails a credibility check that it was only used once. The whole world knew Japan was going to surrender and we still dropped nuclear bombs on them twice. This would be a much more precise weapon that literally and figuratively has less fallout.
I don’t get your last point. You’re claiming they don’t have it because they didn’t use it over 80 years ago?
You are saying they have a weapon that let's them bend space time but incredulous that I would imply they should use it in the past? That argument isn't even internally consistent. Why can't they use it in the past if that is what you say it does?
That wasn't what I said though. I was practicing reasoning by analogy. You say they have developed a new superweapon that only they have. We can imagine what that looks like by looking at history for past times when that happened, nuclear bombs. This doesn't look like that at all for a variety of reasons.
I never said or implied anything near weapon or super weapon. You steered that way by yourself.
Bending space time does not exactly mean ability to time travel to whatever year you want. I should’ve been more specific. My context and interest resides with the original content that Marty shared from Ashton Forbes. Who is a very diligent researcher and technically inclined. He focuses more on “bending space”, faster than light travel, warp drives, and free energy. https://youtube.com/@justxashton
There's no video evidence they haven't used it. That's the basis for this belief.
As if these people wouldn't be crying "fake" in the same way should there be more videos of the same thing. The same people who think gravity is bending and warping for spacetime. LOL
I’m not sure if I’m interpreting your first sentence correctly with a double negative and perhaps a missing comma. Regardless, this is the video evidence: https://youtu.be/mxJhHyusOps
good to see you on here more marty. excited for next TFTC😂
People have no idea.
The MH370 videos are real. They have had this technology for DECADES.
Okay now use it to fix the deficit or lower taxes lol
This is the kind of crazy that makes me love the Internet
they ment your time and space
Time travel is possible 👏
Indeed. I time traveled just last night. Woke up in the future eight hours later.
Check out Ashton Forbes’ work on this — think it might be real.
oh plz! you manipulate time and space every time you push the gas pedal or go for a jog! they're just using some hyperbole!
?cid=9b38fe91ldityqhpwe5r5lnguysj4fg0trtiaub3dttm3lpq&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
That's code for legalizing marijuana.
Seriously, though. It's just a case of flowery language and hyperbole. We can communicate and do businesses instantly across the world. Travel takes a tiny fraction of the time it used to. To a person of 200 years ago, these technologies seem fantastical.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
-- Arthur C. Clarke