what percentage of your stack is coinjoined?

I’m not sure why I’m hesitant to go 100%, or even close to

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I am 100% coinjoined and/or no KYC

You're hesitant because you wanna make sure you can sell for fiat anon

This is the way.

err, no anon - I’m cognizant of potential legal consequences if my jurisdiction deems coinjoined/mixed coins illegal at some point in the future

don’t you dare assume I would take fiat profits on my #bitcoin

How will they know they are yours? πŸ€”

They wouldn't know but they could invent another dumb law that forces you to somehow proof where your once bought KYC bitcoin went. If you spent them, gave them away or lost them.

I know, "boating accident" and so on, but it wouldn't be the first law which is flawed from the ground up...

Your jurisdiction means you aren't using VPN. There are no jurisdictions in cyberspace

So, as long as there are potential legal consequences in the future you'll comply?

Then there is no point in owning Bitcoin. They can just 6102 you and make it illegal to own in the future.

legal consequences don’t imply my complicity; there is no shame in coming out in front of citizens with sats that openly belong to me and to fight the establishment

if we forever hide in the shadows, what message does that send to the wider world?

how can we ever hope to reach mass adoption if we implicitly behave like we’re always on the backfoot

we as humans have the right to free speech, and bitcoin is speech, God fucking dammit

You said you don't do something because of potential future legal consequences (not even illegal right now). So it doesn't make sense why you hold bitcoin if they can just make it illegal in the future. They already did that to gold. It makes even more sense they would do it to something as threatening to them as Bitcoin.

We also have the right to privacy enshrined in the 4th amendment. But words on paper didn't ever stop government before. I'm not going to impotently beg politicians and governments to respect my rights. We have to take our rights and make them unassailable. Privacy and anonymity via encryption are one way to do this.

Hey, I get the sentiment man. It's not about hiding in the shadows though. It's about consent. Your business is no one elses unless you want it to be.

Mass adoption doesn't concern me. Some will learn by being burned. If they need it they'll find it and use it. If someone doesn't want something you won't be able to convince them. Adoption should happen organically if your tool is valuable and useful to people.

while I agree #bitcoin presented greater threat than that of gold, I have one word: enforceability

while they could rip KYC sats from law abiding citizens, the public outcry from human rights groups and international condemnation would be - IMO - disastrous

the economic fallout of any Western nation *actually* criminalizing #bitcoin would be a neon-light pointing straight to the exit gates of that nation; even China hasn’t fully done so, and if they haven’t, the USA most likely won’t

inalienable rights have been enshrined, and the #bitcoin experiment is too far gone to squash

Governments commit atrocities all the time. They'll frame Bitcoiners as extremists or some shit if necessary, propagandize the public, and those human rights groups and other nations will fall in line for the most part like they always do. Look at the covid hysteria. Majority bought that shit up.

They don't need to be able to directly control your Bitcoin to bend your fingers. If they know you own Bitcoin they can threaten you with prison if you don't cooperate. In more extreme regimes, they can torture or kill you and your family. 99% of people will give in to that kind of duress.

That's why privacy and anonymity are both important.

what do you recommend for coinjoins?

I use whirlpool, there are maxis on both sides, I just use it because it's in sparrow already

cool thanks :)

Wasabi Wallet, BTCPay Server, and Trezor have the largest and most private coinjoins. Unlike Whirlpool, there is no common input ownership revealed, no totic change to trace, and there's no coordinator fees charged for any inputs 1m sats or lower.

https://youtu.be/UbOAbXjzBJg?feature=shared

thanks!

Terrible advice. Wasabi partners with chain analysis firms. They are literally helping the enemy. Not to mention their implementation of Coinjoin is flawed. https://cryptoslate.com/are-you-exposed-how-chainalysis-cracked-the-wasabi-bitcoin-privacy-wallet/

Told yah there are maxis on both sides πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Question: Do any of them offer actual privacy or refusal to feds if you don't run your own server, node, etc.? Which is better for a pleb with no self-hosting?

Wasabi is designed in a way that the client does not trust the backend. No sensitive information is ever revealed: no xpub, no IP, no common input / output, etc.

Even if the wabisabi coordinator is run by an active adversary, the client should protect you. (those are bold claims, Wasabi is still WIP, and this architecture goal is bloody difficult to build)

yes you didπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Whirlpool is flawed because it produces toxic change and reveals common input ownership.

If your claim that Wasabi's implementation is flawed, why don't you prove it showing everyone where this this 1 BTC input that was traced through Whirlpool went once it entered the WabiSabi coinjoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5453744.msg62925293#msg62925293

wasabi pays snitch chain analysis

What do you do to buy stuff at the store in Canada? Prepaid visa?

Does not going 100% mean you have different wallets for coinjoined and not coinjoined?