I pick B 🫡

B

My vote is A. Its more concrete. I feel like inflation is still a nebulous word to some normies, who are still susceptible to it being explained away by corporate greed, Russia, etc. Dollars losing value may get them digging deeper! Love it!

B. Non “dollarised” peeps can stick these places too.

A

A

A…and suggest “Dollars Lose Purchasing Power” or “Dollars Lose Their Value” and keep simpler, fewer words.

I do like B though now that I’m looking at it again.

🤔

B. Easier to read / catch.

A

B

B it's way better

danger labels state very clearly what the danger is. in this case, it should just read "Danger Monetary Inflation" the smaller text tells you what the consequence is. even smaller is how to remedy or what to do if those consequences arise.

A

A.. the message is direct

A

The message is clearer on "A"; but the readability is better on "B".

Maybe try:

"DANGER!

Inflation devalues dollars!"

B

A

A, because it’s something close to them that they already have which is losing value

A

A

A

Both! I think B is a better overall design but the message of A is better and more attention grabbing.

A

A

B

A

B

I like B better

A!

A!

I prefer option B

A, because I'm sick of people believing inflation just happens.

'Purchasing' is ALWAYS a value for value exchange.

Did EVERYTHING gain more value in the last several years? No, the dollar LOST tons of value.

I didn't get any bitcoin till I GOT bitcoin, and I didn't GET bitcoin till I GOT the dollar.

I think B delivers the urgency without the information that helps the 'straights' get understanding of the source of 'inflation'.

If I understood (all of the problems with) the dollar in 2009, I would have a shit ton more bitcoin right now.

A because it is more clear. Inflation is expected

PEOPLE HAVE ZERO ATTENTION SPAN

BF

B 💯