Wolves are pack animals. The ones that selected for domestication would have been the most submissive of the group, not the alpha animals. That's why dogs generally prefer an owner who's in control.
Many times I've met dogs that "just don't listen", but funnily enough they listen to me, because I know how to use intonation and body language to communicate with them. I notice this especially with dogs raised & trained by women FWIW. The dogs seem happier when someone is in control, that's what they expect & respect. My last 2 dogs were exactly like this, looking for someone to lead them. Initially badly behaved, but quickly fell in line.
I think a majority of humans are this way too actually. They would prefer being part of a group, even if it means giving up some of their freedom. Looking through history this seems to be the case, tribes and societies form because of it. Without modern conveniences living a life by yourself would have been very hard.
This makes sense and makes me think that it really is about power. Everyone falls into their respective role based on where they land on the power hierarchy. And straying from that role toward freedom without the power meant death. That means this is evolutionarily based.
I think it depends on how you mean by freedom as well. "Freedom to" vs "Freedom from". Society is a tradeoff between these.
A lone person or dog is free to do whatever they want, but must rely entirely on themselves for everything.
A member of a tribe or pack gains freedom from worrying about hunger, hunting/gathering as a group is easier. Freedom from worrying about violence, as you have more power in numbers. Freedom from having to take care of every facet of your life, because tasks can be specialized and the results shared.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed