its not a left or right question and also he was promoting the current governments political views and supporting genocide
Discussion
Probably not your intention but this comment sounds like justification for his murder
nope, i am saying that there are situations when you have to choose between 1 death or 100k death, and which choice is more ethical and if you are promoting death in front of a large audience, there is a big chance that you are also causing death, and not only 1
for example: when hitler died would you said that it is very sad that this person died, he had a family, rest in peace hitler?
An equivalent case could be made for killing vocal pro-choice speakers because their speaking might cause the deaths of many pre-birth babies.
I don’t believe Charlie was pro death of innocents in any case.
Comparing him to hitler who was explicitly and absolutely pro death is false equivalence.
I think I understand what you’re trying to say though.
im glad i could explain it and yes i was just trying to find a radical example so it is more demonstrative, so yeah its difficult to find a grood example, but everybody knows hitler and kind of has similar opinions (most of the time)