Replying to Avatar Expatriotic

I've been on nostr for about a week.

In that time I've observed an argument between two camps.

LN vs Monero.

I've observed some issues with this argument that will result in it never being resolved. For LN advocates, take note.

Follow me โคต๏ธ

1. LN advocates saying "find my transaction". This is problematic because this is something a nation state or WoS COULD do... But not me. So stop asking. We get that LN is a network. Also what about receiver privacy? Which is distinct from senders. Is everyone (and every LN flavor) using trampoline, MPP, blinded routes, taproot etc.? See argument number 3.

2. LN advocates talking about Bitcoin being a better store of value than monero. Sure. Okay. But I'm not convinced this is compelling. First of all, most people on nostr actually use bitcoin as a SoV already, so it's a moot point. Plus, the LN vs monero argument is about payments anyway. Eg the BEST way to make LN is custodially anyway, and most people say, "don't worry, I only have a small amount with custodians, for use as a proxy for receiving or to spend more easily." Okay, well many people use monero similarly, only holding enough for some payments for the next month or so. But at least with monero one has the benefit of not relying on a custodian.a

3. It's actually impossible to argue with someone about LN because of how many ways it can be run. Fully custodially or super hardcore mode. And each one has problems. But this makes it effectively impossible to argue against because the goal posts can just keep shifting. I call this the infinite edge case problem.

4. LN advocates need to think about why DNMs have no desire to receive LN payments. If LN gets good enough from a UX and DEFAULT privacy perspective, it might see more adoption by privacy advocates.

As if a DNM wants to manage the help tickets that would flood in from the barrage of people complaining about failed payments.

5. Anecdotally, I remember during the high fee environment I got really into the idea of only using LN.

So I set up Blixt and got tons of inbound liquidity (which cost me over 200,000 sats), only to have constant issues with RoboSats and payment failures. It's NOT a panacea when one tries to do it self sovereignly.

And IF ASINQ or WoS or LNbig are always one hop away we need to really ask ourselves if we have the privacy we think we do. Or are we trusting these super nodes to be benevolent.

This is a stupid argument because buying Bitcoins not tied to your identity is superior to everything, including monero.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree with this.

For sure, Bitcoin not tied to your identity is awesome! I mine Bitcoin and never buy KYC. Did you mean to comment on my post or a different monero maxi post?

This post was to help educate LN advocates about some of the difficulties with their argumentation. Or maybe you didn't read it? Only reason I can think you'd post such a non sequitur.

Non sequitur doesn't apply here bud, but sure lmfao ๐Ÿ˜‚

Define this.

You say "this" is a stupid argument.

But

1. I never argued Monero is better money than Bitcoin

2. I had a list of different points. Which of them were "this" which is singular. Or are you completely incapable of comprehending nuance.

I'm glad you understand what a non sequitur is. And here I was thinking you were an absolute moron

You can buy Monero not tied to your identity too (or almost any other crypto) so how is that unique to Bitcoin?

The difference is with Monero you avoid tying your identity to it AND have private transactions. Lacking the latter opens up attacks to uncovering the former (i.e. accidental consolidations, address reuse, amount analysis, etc)

Are you this stupid Saberhagen?!

Or are you just marketing Monero.

Or both? ๐Ÿ˜‚

Yes, I get paid $100 every time you use monero. Please use it! Please!!!

This is a good example of tribal nonsense on the bitcoin side.

My problem is Monero folks have ended up just as bad and often condescending.

I remembetr the early days of Monero. We respected each other.

Most of the arguments here have been polarising and shallow. I appreciate the op.

Guilty on both sides for sure

Monero folks are mostly privacy aware Bitcoiners that created Monero for Bitcoiners.

It's not us vs them. It's us struggling with each other over the different trade offs we made and make.

It's what gives Nostr value over centralised social media that always leans to one side trying to mute other perspectives on life.

Yes, I couldn't agree with this more, but I've seen that attitude disappear and be replaced by an attitude of Bitcoiners are stupid, that they've ruined Bitcoin, that it's been co-opted by blockstream, basically all of the narratives that Craig Wright used. It has become an us versus them type of a situation. And I just think this is a mistake. I have said since the beginning that Monero fills a gap that Bitcoin simply cannot fill by design. And I still believe that. And the opposite is true as well.

That said, I think development on top of Bitcoin can certainly take us towards a much closer to monero experience, at least on certain layers above the base chain. Liquid is a good example of something that could do this were it to be used more.

1. I'm a bitcoiner... I just happen to use monero also. It has amazing utility as a private payment method.

2. Your mention of Liquid is telling as it reveals both a dependency on second layers and federations, as well as the core devs unwillingness time and again to push privacy improvements to the base layer.

Liquid doesn't do anything to hide sender/receiver either. Very far behind todays privacy tech.

Ok I'm stupid and marketing Monero.

Now would you like to actually address what I said though?

tell me you didn't read the post without telling me...