I've been on nostr for about a week.

In that time I've observed an argument between two camps.

LN vs Monero.

I've observed some issues with this argument that will result in it never being resolved. For LN advocates, take note.

Follow me ‡️

1. LN advocates saying "find my transaction". This is problematic because this is something a nation state or WoS COULD do... But not me. So stop asking. We get that LN is a network. Also what about receiver privacy? Which is distinct from senders. Is everyone (and every LN flavor) using trampoline, MPP, blinded routes, taproot etc.? See argument number 3.

2. LN advocates talking about Bitcoin being a better store of value than monero. Sure. Okay. But I'm not convinced this is compelling. First of all, most people on nostr actually use bitcoin as a SoV already, so it's a moot point. Plus, the LN vs monero argument is about payments anyway. Eg the BEST way to make LN is custodially anyway, and most people say, "don't worry, I only have a small amount with custodians, for use as a proxy for receiving or to spend more easily." Okay, well many people use monero similarly, only holding enough for some payments for the next month or so. But at least with monero one has the benefit of not relying on a custodian.a

3. It's actually impossible to argue with someone about LN because of how many ways it can be run. Fully custodially or super hardcore mode. And each one has problems. But this makes it effectively impossible to argue against because the goal posts can just keep shifting. I call this the infinite edge case problem.

4. LN advocates need to think about why DNMs have no desire to receive LN payments. If LN gets good enough from a UX and DEFAULT privacy perspective, it might see more adoption by privacy advocates.

As if a DNM wants to manage the help tickets that would flood in from the barrage of people complaining about failed payments.

5. Anecdotally, I remember during the high fee environment I got really into the idea of only using LN.

So I set up Blixt and got tons of inbound liquidity (which cost me over 200,000 sats), only to have constant issues with RoboSats and payment failures. It's NOT a panacea when one tries to do it self sovereignly.

And IF ASINQ or WoS or LNbig are always one hop away we need to really ask ourselves if we have the privacy we think we do. Or are we trusting these super nodes to be benevolent.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You missed the censorship arguments

Apps like amethyst and iris are using social credit score systems to censor users

I need to understand this more. I've not seen any posts laying out the evidence for this

My profile bio has three proof links

And if you browse my timelime, there was discussion with the dev today and screenshots

What has that to do with his note about LN?πŸ€”

Ahh, true. I missed that logical flaw

Not related

But other important drama

I mainly use lightning for Nostr and robosats, and LNMarkets, you can’t zap with Monero and there is no robosats or LNMarkets equivalent is there?

I sell monero for sats on robosats.

but if you want fiat need to use haveno.

nothing like LNMarkets

You can take my wise dollars, bastards are trying to suppress my account

Wise is giving you a hard time??

not really but I am a crypto anarchist

That sucks... Basically the only bank I use when I use fiat.

HMU on Signal @expatriotic.01

I can pay you with monero for the dollars

I'm actually thinking of trying out bisq or something like this. IDK how it'll work exactly but it's worth the education and I've always wanted to try pure p2p. It's not a lot of money <$50 but in my currency, I could go for a lekker braai with that cash and close the silly TansferWise account.

U south African? Lekker braai haha. I work with a bunch of South Africans

expatriotic.me/bisq

will take a look later tonight, ya I am.

what problems are you having with wise?

being from Africa

No-KYC and DEX behind Tor similar to Robosats:

https://retoswap.com/

Ok thanks and looks like it does fiat and bitcoin too, good to have options. How would you rate it compared to Bisq and robosats?

More privacy. Less liquidity (yet).

Basically this

Cheaper to transact and more private than Bisq since it's based on Monero, but less liquidity

More expensive to transact than Robosats (cents vs fractions of a cent), but I'm fairly sure it has significantly more liquidity than Robosats (fact check me on that though)

For Nostr at least, you can technically zap with Monero if you use moStard.

https://mostard.org

This is a stupid argument because buying Bitcoins not tied to your identity is superior to everything, including monero.

I agree with this.

For sure, Bitcoin not tied to your identity is awesome! I mine Bitcoin and never buy KYC. Did you mean to comment on my post or a different monero maxi post?

This post was to help educate LN advocates about some of the difficulties with their argumentation. Or maybe you didn't read it? Only reason I can think you'd post such a non sequitur.

Non sequitur doesn't apply here bud, but sure lmfao πŸ˜‚

Define this.

You say "this" is a stupid argument.

But

1. I never argued Monero is better money than Bitcoin

2. I had a list of different points. Which of them were "this" which is singular. Or are you completely incapable of comprehending nuance.

I'm glad you understand what a non sequitur is. And here I was thinking you were an absolute moron

You can buy Monero not tied to your identity too (or almost any other crypto) so how is that unique to Bitcoin?

The difference is with Monero you avoid tying your identity to it AND have private transactions. Lacking the latter opens up attacks to uncovering the former (i.e. accidental consolidations, address reuse, amount analysis, etc)

Are you this stupid Saberhagen?!

Or are you just marketing Monero.

Or both? πŸ˜‚

Yes, I get paid $100 every time you use monero. Please use it! Please!!!

This is a good example of tribal nonsense on the bitcoin side.

My problem is Monero folks have ended up just as bad and often condescending.

I remembetr the early days of Monero. We respected each other.

Most of the arguments here have been polarising and shallow. I appreciate the op.

Guilty on both sides for sure

Monero folks are mostly privacy aware Bitcoiners that created Monero for Bitcoiners.

It's not us vs them. It's us struggling with each other over the different trade offs we made and make.

It's what gives Nostr value over centralised social media that always leans to one side trying to mute other perspectives on life.

Yes, I couldn't agree with this more, but I've seen that attitude disappear and be replaced by an attitude of Bitcoiners are stupid, that they've ruined Bitcoin, that it's been co-opted by blockstream, basically all of the narratives that Craig Wright used. It has become an us versus them type of a situation. And I just think this is a mistake. I have said since the beginning that Monero fills a gap that Bitcoin simply cannot fill by design. And I still believe that. And the opposite is true as well.

That said, I think development on top of Bitcoin can certainly take us towards a much closer to monero experience, at least on certain layers above the base chain. Liquid is a good example of something that could do this were it to be used more.

1. I'm a bitcoiner... I just happen to use monero also. It has amazing utility as a private payment method.

2. Your mention of Liquid is telling as it reveals both a dependency on second layers and federations, as well as the core devs unwillingness time and again to push privacy improvements to the base layer.

Liquid doesn't do anything to hide sender/receiver either. Very far behind todays privacy tech.

Ok I'm stupid and marketing Monero.

Now would you like to actually address what I said though?

tell me you didn't read the post without telling me...

πŸ’―

These are all the same points that I constantly go round and round with LN maxis. There are several metrics you can look at to see that LN is largely custodial users and so the full potential privacy benefits of LN don't apply to vast majority of it's users. That's obviously because of it's horrid UX of using privately.

1. "find my transaction" is a funny one because they are sort of right. If I'm using Wallet of Satoshi I'm pretty private from the general public, but that isn't the only threat. You're not private at all from Wallet of Satoshi, hackers/data leaks that get access to that centralized information (data breaches happen constantly), and governments that coerce WoS into giving them that info. It's similar privacy to a bank.

2. Very common misdirection tactic: Transactional privacy --> SoV

3. Yep pretty nuanced and depends how the person you're arguing with uses it.

4. "The market is right" as they often say. I think if Lightning started off with similar ease of sovereign UX (and default blinded paths) it would be probably be competitive with Monero on DNMs. But that still isnt the case and it would take a lot to change current inertia especially with Monero being able to support L2s soon.

5. High fees onchain translate to problems transacting on LN. This happens every time there is a high fee environment - like early last year for example.

ASINQ already tell us we have no privacy from them:

https://phoenix.acinq.co/faq#how-private-are-my-payments-on-phoenix

https://phoenix.acinq.co/privacy#lightning-privacy

Not sure if you've listened to this conversation about the nuances of LN vs Monero privacy with SuperTestNet and Luke Parker:

https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1824429972976467968/vid/avc1/1280x720/l3yDSpkAxQhHIWN6.mp4?tag=14

Hell yeah brother I listen to Max/Ungovernable Misfits all the time 🀘

It stopped playing at minute 49... Couldn't find this on the Opt Out podcast on Podverse

Unfortunately it's not an officially released video

See if this link makes any difference (or downloading it perhaps):

https://xcancel.com/sethforprivacy/status/1824430539828289755