Biggest complaints:

- Bitcoin echo chamber / not enough variety of content

- Difficult to use (my guess is these people have only tried it once 8 months ago lol..)

- Feeds not busy enough

- Toxic to web 3

My thoughts:

I bet we can solve a lot of these complaints just by asking people to select some topics to follow in onboarding and doing away with global entirely, or make it an optional thing. It seems global is responsible for turning people off because they see a bunch of spam / too much bitcoin content and or some other crap.

Topics solves some of this - they will see more focused content.

Better navigation UX can help - like browsing hashtags (see primal).

The network effects thing IS a challenge. Have to have users to create content and have to have content to attract users. Lists could help here. Even something as suggesting a list of RSS feeds that post on Tech news for example would be helpful. We already have RSS feeds for all sorts of stuff but they are difficult to surface.

Engaging with non-bitcoin content can help too (if you find it interesting, probably don’t want to force it).

Other than that I am not sure how to get more non-bitcoin users here other than creating a ā€œsafe spaceā€ for them where they don’t see that type of content at all. Whether that’s a bitcoin-free relay or a client that specifically mutes bitcoin terms via a pre-defined (user can still modify) mute list, or something else I can’t think of atm. nostr:note1j5cx3j3h7prnr46yyfa4akllsjach4qxhnzu0tu4pcgh3afcj0qs5rd0w8

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’m beginning to think a lot of people’s issue with social media is people.

Watching culture evolve here is reinforcing that view.

Can you expand on this?

Tribalism, binary thinking, hostile dialog, ad hominem, thought silo’ing…

Things like that. One of the things Nostr can’t (and shouldn’t try) to fix, is the breakdown of civil discourse and the poor education in debate and oratory.

I’m seeing a lot of the same old wars and fights starting to appear. Yeah, you can mute, etc. but I think people are overall exhausted (as a whole, not specific people I’m referring to) which is why we’ve seen social media usage continuing to decline.

The issue is social, and wherever they move, they bring those issues with them.

This does not detract from the qualities or value of Nostr philosophically imo. I’m just saying I’m beginning to sense the same exhausting and isolating vibe creeping in. That’s why I value people like you so much.

This is where the "other stuff" kicks in. I dont think people will join nostr for its own sake. More likely they'll sign up for some service and then hey look, its compatible with all these other services. Twitter clients make a good town square for those specifically interested in nostr and surrounding topics. Otherwise, its about the interoperability and what lies on top rather than the protocol itself

I like your positivity. ā¤ļø

Best/realest community I've been a part of so that drives my positivity šŸ«‚

We have zap.stream and people join that occasionally. Streams will show in snort too. Lots of interoperability coming I think

Zap.Stream is no lie, one of the best designed and implemented non-Twitter-clone projects out there.

Is usefulness, potential, and market is immediately obvious, and it makes me more bullish on Nostr than a lot of other things do. Streaming is something everyone else simply does wrong, and I can honestly say ā€œ Nostr fixes thisā€ in that case.

Seeing the same old fights arise is off putting for sure…

Only thing I can control, though, is how I react to these issues. Been really trying to not repeat old patterns. But that’s just me.

The world changes one person at a time. But it can feel lonely.

I’m only expressing the issue. I agree with you. ā¤ļø

Finally some sanity instead of outright dismissal and cope. You are spot on. Still hate hashtags as a solution.

Yeah hashtags are clunky.

communities...šŸ˜‰

Twitter uses topics and that’s a large driver of discovery for users there. They literally look at which keywords are in a tweet and put that into a topic.

The downside it that relies on a centralized entity curating the topics. They need the resources to scan every note, discard spam and caregorize it.

At least with native nostr communities, topic curation is up to the users.

Relays could do that I think. But we already have communities. Check nostrapps.com

Maybe community posts could be surfaced via the feed somehow?

I know, I'm the creator of some of them. I just think they should have more protagonism and support in the popular clients.

Nostr feels a bit like a High School clique which turns me away for stretches. The culture feels kinda forced and lame at times as well.

I know we're still super early but that's just my honest opinion.

I will say the variety of content is the biggest issue. A lot of content is bitcoin centered which is fine, but the main reason that content doesn't exist is because said people aren't generating that content.

Best thing would be to either mirror your content from X or IG to have that variety.

Yeah it’s a tough problem to solve. This requires a lot of us to have an active role in surfacing a variety of things.

Make multiple nyms. Post on nyms of various interests. Create content on said nyms using habla or such. Engage with fellow nyms. Build the content you want on nostr.

Whether or not global is a default on/off I think it is critical for freedom of speech and emergencies that global can always be enabled.

I keep my global feed, extremely filtered, but if there was a national emergency, I would absolutely be flipping those switches on

Come to think of it, it would be really great to eventually have a Geo fenced global feed optio

so you could see real time updates in your area in an emergency especially. With the ability to opt out of sharing that kind of data of course.

Maybe it’s not really needed with hashtags, but could be interesting

It’s hard to do right now as there is not much geo-specific content right now.

Yeah, seems like a cool feature for the future of nostr

I’d really like to see social med that can help people solidify friendships and relationships in real life

Being new to Nostr, I missed the heavy bitcoiner stuff or whatever it was. I just see a ton of potential for the protocol. However, talking to people about using Nostr, I get a lot of, "LOL, no." The FOSS crowd should be all over it, but they just dismiss it immediately. Community creation could fix that. They'd log in and see a feed of familiar content instead of the chaos of global. Personally, I like the randomness, but the reality is that a lot of people aren't looking for stuff outside their comfort bubble. Hashtags kind of work in the meantime. Searching and following them isn't obvious on some of the clients, though.

Yeah it’s baffling to me why FOSS people are not here but at the same time you make a great point about them needing their bubbles.

We have people who spend more time taking about nostr on telegram than on nostr itself which I find sad and amusing. Obviously something needs to be fixed.

Gonna be a hot take, but telegram in the best messaging experience I’ve ever had. What works make me happy would be them opening the space to the backend properly.

I hate telegram. Spam every day. If we had private coms on nostr I’d rather use that.

A great example of YMMV. I haven’t had any spam. Thanks for sharing that.

I have my privacy settings pretty locked down. Only contracts can even see I’m online. I wonder if you have have different settings.

Rescuing newcomers from global asap might help the onboarding. I can only imagine how many just straight nope right out after seeing the global firehose šŸ˜…

Coming from Mastodon, I see the same reaction from people when they experience the federated feed for the first time.

Would love to hear their actual reasons that weren’t some other sources than their experience .. I. Cant seem to hear anything from a place of reason on my end , even asking for an honest reason seems to make them mad?

We just need to #Zap diverse content.

When all the zaps go to the Lyns and Jacks for their Bitcoin/Nostr content. It’s a feedback loop that that’s the content wanted here.

The more diverse content gets zapped, the more word of mouth spreads.

**We should find a content creator every week, and Zap the living hell out of their wallet.**

Instead of a #Zapathon we need #Creatoroftheweek.

Agreed. I’m trying to grow the art community

nostr:note10ftyze58r3ns72829u3tjwtazc24me6jhz3tj5w0gqel2zfqvv4qqp9ckj

I think a real ostrich farmer posting daily could help the cause. Keeping my eyes out.

https://youtube.com/shorts/kf6pnUbg-3Y?feature=share

Have a section that has zero Bitcoin, too. they won't have as much fun but...

āš”ļø

Thoughts on using bertopic to tag the nostr events?

I would like to create some rss feed bots any idea on how to make one?

Usenet had (has?) a tried and true topics hierchy. In the days, I was subscribed to computer. lang. perl and rec. windsurfing.

Anyone could add her topic, just had to convince nodes to support it.

https://web.cortland.edu/flteach/methods/obj2/usenet-hier.html

Web 3 can suck a dick tho?

I just started and learning to navigate both Iris and Snort. I figured I would just bring over and share content that I was either sharing or consuming elsewhere in order to help add non BTC related content. It takes a little extra work to get started on NOSTR, but not that much. People generally only want convenience and comfort.

#Amethyst

Started now. I like the UI

I think you still need global, yes it can be an echo chamber at times, but sometimes I just scroll through the global feed and find other stuff that interests me, but if there was a client that would start up new people with a list of hashtags to follow, that would be awesome

I for one don't mind that Nostr is dominated by Bitcoiners to start off with. Good in my eyes that they set the tone here.

Toxic to web3? Yeah... There's no fixing that. If you bring your web3 shitcoinery here you will be rightly criticized.

Obviously I cannot tell people what to do but if the first message written to a new nonbitcoiner user is ā€œmake sure to set up your lightning wallet for zaps so you can receive bitcoin!ā€

They’re going to leave. It’s a turnoff and sounds scammy. IMO it’s best to let them learn naturally, which will happen if they aren’t scared off the protocol immediately.

Yep, see this all the time but there’s really no way to stop it.

yes damn people trying to help new people receive money on the network. Treacherous folk.

šŸ˜‚ quite shady this.

You’ve missed the point.

There are potentially millions of people looking for an alternative to twitter. A very large majority of those people don’t give a shit about bitcoin in general or earning money on social media. They want a twitter like app without all the downfalls - kyc, rigged algos, subscriptions to be seen, etc. They aren’t looking for a way to make money on social media. They want to keep up with the news, see what’s going on in the world and their communities, and talk to their friends. That’s hard to do when there’s no one from their social circles here, so the only way this grows is by attracting people from all walks of life and building a network effect.

These people aren’t going to leave twitter just because they can earn 1000 sats on a post. They’re going to leave twitter when they can get a similar experience elsewhere without the downfalls i mentioned above. It might be a hard to swallow pill that zaps aren’t going to be what brings people over here, but it’s the truth. The average joe just does not care at all (yet).

User retention needs to go up to create the network effect that will then retain more users. Giving people a sales pitch about something they don’t care about, and probably find annoying (another hard truth) isn’t a good way to retain users.

That’s why I fully believe, and have said multiple times, that one of nostr’s biggest issues is the lack of content discovery.

So your suggestion is to censor people who try to help people set up their zaps? I don’t know how you would stop people from doing what you’re concerned about. I think the problem is greatly exaggerated, and i doubt its true that most people would prefer not to earn money on posts.

No, that is not my suggestion at all.

ā€œI can’t tell people what to doā€ was the first thing I said. People can do whatever tf they want. I’m just trying to make people aware that the twitter refugees aren’t looking for zaps, and most of the population still finds bitcoin annoying. Using zaps as a sales pitch or welcome pitch isn’t going to work for a majority of people. Instead of immediately telling people they can earn bitcoin, it’d be better to help people figure out where to discover content they want to see and work out the other basics like relays and such.

Using zaps to sell nostr to normal people is like trying to sell a car to a 12 year old. The car could be perfect in every aspect, and you can be giving them a hell of a deal, but they just aren’t ready yet and probably don’t understand it so they’re just going to walk away.

When we solve note zaps let’s automate wallet setup so this is not the first thing people hear šŸ™‚

I’m so guilty of this. And I was accused of trying to scam people lol. šŸ˜‚

I should have learned, definitely stopping.

They can wait till the #Zapathon to learn about it.

Web3:

Why would we embrace greater centralization risk, VC control, and a propensity to shitcoin?

This. Is. Nostr.

(Not wEb3.)

Fuck everything - it is not even something that is definable properly.

Web3 i.e. It is basically Buzzwordware.

Being a Bitcoin echo chamber and an environment that's toxic towards Web3 is a feature, not a bug šŸ˜‚

But seriously, growing Nostr into new and exciting content has been a goal for a long while.

And to think we haven’t even experienced bitcoin nostr in a ripping bull market.

Clients should show the global and some beautiful hashtags like #art or #photography or #nature and refine from there by gradually following the follow list and dropping the global depending on the size of the follow list.

Filtering feeds by language could help a lot for people onboarding.

I also find the content bitcoin-heavy. But that's what the people who have put in the effort want to talk about, so be it.

There's plenty of time and opportunity to shape this environment to everyone's liking.

I just started with nostr and this note of yours sums up my experience so far.. but then there's plenty of interesting discussion in the replies. So.. maybe content is ok afterall.

I don't have a problem with the difficult onboarding. I wonder if it selects for a more interesting user base? TBD šŸ¤”

Speaking as someone who just came to the platform, I could not tell initially if there were a lot of people here or just very few. I did not want to follow all the people that were suggested to me in part because they all seemed overly bitcoin related. (I quite like Lightning btw, so one can slowly be converted :-)

But then not having followed a lot of people, my client was filtering the topics such as #scala. It took me some time to work out that I had to open the the filter on one client from close social network to the extended one (can’t remember quite which web client that was now) to see anything at all.

Then with the extended network set it still does not seem to be a lot of discussion on feeds like #scala or #RDF, well even less than on Mastodon which was not very busy either. So it helped when I worked out to add mostr.pub . Though I think tweets from there should be highlighted differently.

On an open social network one has to be able to see what the intermediary friends of friends are that led one to see a specific post, if only so that one remove some intermediaries that lead to too much spam, but also to understand how people are related.

I think whatever could help foster discussions would help people build communities more quickly.

They don't have to be non-Bitcoin users. It is probably best that they are Bitcoiners (or can be quickly converted); the sorting and economy building is a good thing.

But, it is possible to be a Bitcoiner that is not so obsessed with the thing that one talks about it 24/7 as if it is the single most interesting topic conceivable. There are a thousand other things that the crowd here could be talking about and should probably be promoted... like all of the liberty (libertarian) topics.

Pulling new users from libertarian spaces is actually our quickest pay off, most likely.

I don't really want to see the mainstream topics and culture imported over here, so I'm against the safe space idea. It's ok if the userbase is different from other platforms. It doesn't meet any goals if the userbase is just fanatical Bitcoiners.