So a short infographic I've been working based on the talks I've had over the weekend and when the 5 cups of coffee finally left my body.
#Mastodon #Fediverse #infographic #resist
Discussion
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqj2cmxe8vzjwcm8ladwpp9nmdnd5mg4lhhp87s63l80ucm7tnfewslesyse looking good! 💅
What is your opinion on nostr and the dapps space? While it is opensource it seems to collect more Lunduke type crowd.
imo you're overthinking it. few even slightly right survive on mainstream fedi because none of the major servers will federate with a server with such users. so those users/servers either become part of the separate fedi (jerk fedi) dominated by assholes who want to bother people and should not be allowed to, or they go to X, truth etc.
I want a more politically diverse fedi. that will require moderation to focus only on abusive tagging, not saying bad or untrue things.
The correct title is "this is how we censor ideas that we don't like and Foss money, because communism must prevail"
Half the arguments listed in the infographic are just examples of ways participants are able to resist being fed content they don't want to see. If most people don't want to hear your ideas because they disagree with them and find them unethical, what right do you have to force them to view that content?
That's so gay, so you defend censorship in order of people to not get offended? If some user gets offended on mastodon by something he or she contact some moderator which has the power to block or remove content. How can one defend that? Go use mastodon and get the fuck out of nostr if you don't like it here. If you chose to continue you will be around real people that like to debate and are not hiding behind some faggot moderator.
Yeah, I'm not surprised the guy still using gay as an insult lacks reading comprehension. It's not censorship to say "I personally don't want to see this content". Some moderators take it too far and censor things, but the thriving communities are those which are moderated in line with the community's desires. For the rest, people are free to go somewhere else if they don't like it. So given this is all predicated on moderators having the support of the community, I ask again, what right do you have to FORCE them to view content they've agreed they don't want to see?
AFAIK single-user instances are the best in terms of moderation for ActivityPub, if you want to join a Mastodon instance then that's your choice on whether you like or dislike the clique of moderators and their policies, and how transparently they're modified/enforced.
Mastodon, nostr, etc are like any interconnected network – censorship is seen as damage and routed around. The real big benefit nostr has is that identities aren't tied to nodes, so a node censoring any of their users doesn't also censor them from talking to other users/nodes.
As someone who neither identifies with the far right, the far left, central, or any other groups tiny minds want to try and shove me into a box with.
You are absolutely and totally clueless. You are sampling the data from literal echo chamber of circle jerks run by libtard kings on their tiny interconnected throwns of power.
Don’t mind the noise here, would be cool to have a side by side comparison with nostr on these.
This is highly regarded.
I wish, but I don't buy it at all. Every time I see a deranged far-right/nazi post or reply it seems to always be from a Mastodon instance.
Apart from the Dark Enlightenment folk. They seem to be happy sticking around on Urbit.
Laughing all the way to the bitcoin bar with this one.