I was reading The Beginning Of Infinity and it was breaking my brain.

Then I was like why is thinking so fucking painful?

Deutsche’s work made me realize that we mistake coherence for truth because our brains are optimized for simulation, not verification.

But if we compress reality by creating better explanations, we can re-simulate it more accurately and edge closer to truth.

This hurts because it breaks the old coherence. Every new insight like a neural demolition.

Essentially the mind grows by breaking and reforming itself over and over again.

Which is why real thinking is unpleasant, because it’s a process that if done in earnest destroys parts of your own mind.

But nothing new can form in your mind without this painful fracturing.

This means that collapse is necessary for renewal.

And if it’s true on the individual level, then it’s likely true on the collective level as well.

Which means we cannot stop what’s coming and further more why would we want to?

Because to stop it is to retard progress and our understanding of reality.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That book challenged me too. TBH it’s a read more than once book. Time to pull it out again. 😁

This is my second read. When I read it ten years ago I really didn’t understand it.

Oh wow! I read it about 5 years ago. It was juicy but I didn’t find it easy. I remember being very much drawn to it though. Good on you for picking it up again!

This post broke my brain

I hear you. I feel you deep in my timeatspace plums

Predicting the future is futile since we cannot know how much knowledge will be generated before it arrives. In any case, as every time a problem is solved new problems tend to arise, we will always find ourselves, as the title of the book says, at the beginning of the infinite…

Is the collective going to do tgr work though, or just reenforce false realities, amplifying ckiwn world??

Good read

all i understood from this is “retard”

Similar to building new muscle. Increasing neural plasticity can definitely be uncomfortable. Psychedelics may help some.

I'm going to check that book out. I've been listening to Oneness by Rasha and it's been a similarly transformative process.

My problems with Deutsche are his Zionist views on Palestine which follow the collapse being necessary for renewal process. I view progress not as progress for some, others being collateral damage, which is a process repeated often historically. Progress at this point feels like it is freedom to co-create. ‘Explanations’ can feel like the winners writing history. Explanations can hide motivations. Heartfelt reasons also hold validity, part of the beauty of being human. Deutsche needs a psilocybin trip or at least to read Iain McGilchrist in my humble opinion.

One of the most beautiful things you've written.

Interesting book and post.I really liked Deutsches take on optimism.

Thank you for your note. Here’s to our neurons surpassing the individual and the collective.

What you're describing is a real and well-documented demonstration of neural plasticity and cognitive rigidity. There is a neat way to test yourself, and even train yourself to be less rigid

Fold your hands together normally interfacing your fingers.

Now switch (Move the top hand’s fingers one position to the right (or left) so the other hand’s fingers are now on top.

It feels very foreign. This is your brain being exposed to something new.

Keep switching until is feels normal in either position to increase your cognitive plasticity.