Why would a computer *insist*, to the point of not giving me an option, on using a swap partition on a different drive entirely.

And this is AFTER I manually created a swap drive, and selected it as my swap, and the OS still installed it with BOTH the manually created one and the one on the opposite drive as swap… like wtf?

And it has made it so I cannot boot my Pop OS anymore. And I was just trying to dual boot Zorin.

I cannot understand this, and it happened before. I had a swap partition on a drive that had nothing to do with my OS drive. Just a random 250GB in my hot swap stack. Took it out one day having no idea, computer won’t boot.

Now at least I know what’s going on, but same thing happened. Makes no fucking sense.

#asknostr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's simple: they hate us.

computers, I mean.

and we hate them. this is war, Guy

also sorry, that sounds like hell.

hfsp

THANSK FOR NOT HELPING UTXO

Yep, swap is generally useless to put on another partition.

All recent installs allowed me to have swap on the main partition. Are you sure there were not some advanced settings that you missed? Like you just need to select path under the same partition...

Yep, dual booting is surprisingly hard to set up...

I was using basic default settings, but I specifically had to go to advanced to make all other drives visible since they didn’t have pen partitions. Which also makes zero sense to me, because it was a USED swap partition. For what possible reason would the computer select to overwrite a used swap partition instead of creating its own in a fully unused drive with no partition at all?

Agreed it's weird and useless. Swap should just be a file on your main partition. No reason to have separate partition. Im surprised zorin installer didn't let you do it.

There is some reasonable argument to have boot on its own partition, but not swap.

Not sure about the 'insist' bit, but it generally makes a lot of sense to have your swap partition on a separate drive if possible. In most cases where the swap space is actually used, if it is on a separate drive to the OS you will get better performance.

Which happens approximately never? The pains that it adds to have swap on another drive are almost never worth it imo.

Reject swap, embrace zram.

Unless you want to hibernate.

Ideally never, yes - if you have enough ram. You can make decent savings though with good use of swap if it is only occasionally needed.

Sounds like a UI issue in the setup. It is better to have swap on a different drive, but you should always give users the option. The best answer, though, is buy more RAM.

ZFS is always the solution. Often it’s the problem too, however.