I will disagree.
As annoying as it is to think about, every human has the right to privacy. If I was doing dangerous work, I would wear a mask.
Sure, we can argue about if what they are doing is right, but, EVERYONE has the right to privacy. Period. Full. Stop. Point blank. Without exception.
ur view tells me u r maga thug - once u join law office ur individual privacy is only when u off duty. u can twist ur words any way u like
Great assumption but, totally wrong.
I don't to politics. Government, all of it, is evil.
So, no. I'm maga anything. I once was a government thug. I've repented of that stupidity.
So, please cool it with the ad hominem. It's really stupid to try that with me. I don't fit into any box you'll try to fit me in.
most incompetent takes a gov job - parasites of the system- on duty hiding face means criminal
uncle rockstar is NOT doing GOV job neither on gov payroll for example - he has right cover face
working on public security ON DUTY paid by tax payer is called authorized thug gang
All police and federal law enforcement agents are a gang.
What's your point?
getting paid by taxpayer on PUBLIC SECURITY on duty
You make that distinction.
Are the agents human? If so, then they may protect their families by hiding their identity.
My position is consistent.
I cannot understand your position. If you have one.
You really are a black and white idealist.
All gubment employees are parasites.
Not all of them are incompetent.
No, hiding your face on duty does not equate to being a criminal.
There is no logical progression in your statements.
Why is covering your face a crime? A few years ago not covering your face was a crime.
Also, if the agent who shot that woman didn't have a mask on, would that make you happy?
I really don't get your point.
u already revealed how weak n afraid you r afterall
grow some dignity first - ur useless opinion is trash to many - hiding face ON PAID GOV duty - genetically coward
What does dignity have to do with this?
Who am I trashing? I'm disagreeing with your original statement and lack of and cogent framing of the why you think wearing a mask is worse than anything else federal agents are doing?
there nothing called ON DUTY PRIVACY when interacting with and for PUBLIC SAFETY SECURITY
That's your opinion.
Would you like for their families to be harassed, raped, or murdered? I don't. I wouldn't.
You still seem to think there is some distinction between people that is ridiculously arbitrary. The state is the fiction. We are all human. Get over that kind of fiat BS.
One of my closest friends is ICE. They have to wear masks because they are being doxxed and directly targeted and threatened and their families threatened by domestic terrorists.
does not makes any justification - paid by taxpayer n doing public facing job
Does it matter who pays them?
Also, they are evicting non-taxpayers. Isn't that a good thing if you're so concerned about taxes and "the public?"
This is exactly what I've been saying.
🤷♂
One of your closet friends is working for the Mexican cartels and helping Trump get away with raping children?
You friend sounds like a piece of shit
If you have to hide behind a mask to do your job otherwise people will want to kill you, maybe you are the one in the wrong.
If you have people wanting to kill you for doing a job that is necessary because "the people" haven't been doing theirs, you'd want to.
See? We can play around with the issue all day..
Your point is, IMO, untenable in the current reality we live in.
I am an absolutist on this point, and I've yet to come across another way to think about face coverings that is correct all the time.
Why is it necessary? "Temporarily" violate peoples' rights for... the greater good? Sounds like covidian logic.
What if the coordinated invasion of migrants was a planned precursor to normalizing thug like policing of the country? The Feds are good at setting up an environment so that they can step in as the solution. False flags one day, a migrant invasion the next? All leading up to the same end goal of a police state.
Even so-called anarchists on nostr like themselves a little centralized authoritarianism now and then I see.
Because the people being deported are not citizens and have overstayed their welcome and "our" generosity and who are party to (in large part) fraud, rape, and murder, plus actively undermining the foundations of civil society (specifically because that's what Muslims do in places that are not (yet) Muslim majority). So, yeah. They gotta go.
Nothing really more than that. From a minarchist perspective, the federal government is actually, finally doing the work needed to protect the boarders and the citizens of the country.
And this is all planned. Totally. But you want to let them slide for the above criminality? What I'd to be done, then? The simplest solution is to end the welfare state. Period. At all levels. Let humans take care of the humans they want to take care of with no theft (taxes) involved and nearly all of this will solve itself in less than a decade.
I'm not an anarchist. I'm a monarchist. All human government reviles me. Only Christ is King. Please stop trying to peg me as some kind of statist. I'm not and won't ever be. You're barking up the wrong tree if you think that's going to get much of a reaction from me other than an eye roll or a giggle.
You point out very good solutions (end welfare) but then undermine them by going along with a (very statist) solution(?) of grouping people into a category of fraud, rape and murder, whether or not they have done any of that, and then advocating kicking them out to where, exactly?
Is it the Fed's responsibility to protect the border? The same Feds, btw, who a couple years ago let them all in? But the Feds are ok now because you agree with them?
Nobody in Texas wanted their borders violated. The Feds did it. Texas needs a militia like the Constitution clearly allows.
Does the state exist? Yes. No amount of magic fairy dust throwing can change that short of a worldwide other throw of all governments simultaneously will change that.
Is the state doing the simplest thing (that I and others have suggested)? No.
So the only solution left is a statist one.
Does that track?
Yes. Thieves, rapists, and murderers are, in fact, thieves, rapists, and murders. Do you have an issue with that? A conviction comes after they are caught and brought to a modicum of justice. Do you not believe that billions have been defrauded from public coffers? That is widespread theft. Are you blind to increasing rates of sexual assault in areas with higher concentrations of migrants? Same with murder. Yeah... "Not all." But the ones that are are intentionally hidden and protected by people intent on subverting this country. (That's been stated explicitly in so many places by so many people, if you don't acknowledge that, you're just being obtuse.)
If we are speaking of Minneapolis, Somalia. Some SA countries, too. Or if they are rapists or murders, after a quick, thorough trial, a bullet in the back of the head is sufficient.
Yes. Currently. Does it have to be? No. I'd ratter it be handled by the individual states. But, again, it currently is in the court of the FedGov to enforce borders.
Yes, the same feds that let them all in. All of this is entirely arbitrary. But, technically, ICE is doing the job they are created for. Which is better than not. IMO.
Militias are a better option, I agree. No state has sacked up to do that yet. Do you think any will? No. Why? It endangers the local tyrants, too. So... Now what?
When ICE let those millions of migrants in, they were doing their job, too. Are you really so sure of who the enemy is, and it's migrants? Not the ones controlling ICE?
I'm not convinced that Israel's enemies (Muslims) have to be ours. Spread the worst of them into other people's countries and top it off with some scary propaganda to rile up the cucked statist masses. Connect the dots: ICE uses Israeli surveillance tech, a new market beyond their "lab experiment" in Gaza.
They were doing what congress told them to do, and that is also part of the problem. So yes, they were doing their jobs then, too. What is your point? Do you not want them to do the job or not?
Yes. I am very sure of who my enemy is. You don't seem to have a clue. The state is one arm of my enemy, usually the most visible and forceful of the many arms.
Migrants are very often used as weapons. If they are dumb enough to not realize that, that is not my problem.
Congress is most certainly an enemy of the citizens of the US and has been since the founding of the country. But they are being controlled, in vast majority, too. I am not going to bother entertaining any nonsense about "It's the j00s" since they are just another pawn and you need to go deeper than that to get the writhing evil core of, well, evil.
Muslims have always decided that everyone, even other muslims are their enemy. Read their holy writings. Listen to their teachers. Look at history. Islam is not compatible with anything else. Period. It is time to return to the sword and sweep it from the face of the world, since they have raised the sword and are actively using it again. Being naive about this is your own fault, and will get you and many others killed. This is a hill I will (very possibly literally) die on.
Isreal also uses US tech help. What is your point? It's all crooked. But that fact won't stop muslims from taking over the world if the rest of the world is too naive to let them outbreed and rape the rest of the world into submission. They have policies about that. Plain as day.
Just like every Federal agency, they created the problem, and their attempts at fixing it make it worse at best, and at worst, the "fix" was the plan all along. So no, I do not want them to do their jobs.
You need to look more into Jewish holy writings, where the most preferential treatment of Jesus is to call him "that man", and his mother a whore. They are not friends of Christians, meanwhile they are sly as fuck about undermining Christianity and many other things Western. Muslims happen to have a lot more respect for Jesus, and you not knowing that means you are buying the (Jewish) propaganda. I'm not saying Muslims belong in the West, they don't. But also, frankly, Jews don't either, and I'm not advocating for kicking them out either.
No. They did not create the problem. They were told to allow the situation to be created. There is a difference. And it is more important to know how and why this happened as it is the model followed for similar issues throughout the wold.
I am all to familiar with the Talmud. My stomach turns every time they are brought up. But guess what? That has little to do with anything right now.
Blaming the Jews is equivalent to only taking one head off the hydra, and it isn't even that dramatic or effective as that.
I think some Jews do need to be kicked out, especially those involved with AIPAC and the like.
But not kicking out any criminal of foreign origin (including Obama . . . heh) is letting rabid dog packs run amongst your children. Stupid. Bloody. Preventable.
100%
"Muslims" are mostly hypocrites and obedient Statist bootlickers, just like followers of every other religion.
There are no conspiracies of one billion people trying to take over the world, but there are smaller cliques who already rule it using divide-and-rule to distract us.
Shocking news:
Humans are hypocrites. All of them.
Ah, but you are correct! It is not a conspiracy but a stated policy of the caliphate. Of course a few people are pushing that because it hugely benefits them. It still doesn't make the policy untrue.
You know both Judaism and Hinduism teach the same, right?
Its only Christianity and Buddhism that don't, and even they have deviant sects with genocidal teachings
Were you born in the United States? If not where?
Do you live in the United States? If not where?
Never trust a temporary government program. Covid showed us how to get the majority to comply and these violent immigration thugs are showing us how to get the right to root for compliance.
How long until we get a narrative about disease carrying immigrants and casually referring to them as vermin. whole countries have lined up behind that narrative in the past.
Or maybe you are being hounded by violent Marxists and Antifa.
All these migrant "domestic terrorists", a euphemism for normalizing removal of constitutional protection, were let in by the Feds. Now, is giving the same faceless people (the Feds) who let them in, the power to get them out, logical?
Where else in the world currently are there people considered ineligible for rights that other people are "allowed" to have? Are rights negotiable? Not talking about for criminals of course.
Ok. Let's play the "not all" game.
Are there not domestic terrorists? Are their not foreign terrorists? If so, what should be done with them?
What should be done with people (from anywhere) who are actively defrauding literal billions from other people?
I've already proposed the simplest, least violent method of cutting off most of the root of the worst of this. The only other practical option is literally gangs of thugs to root out the other gang of thugs, unless the people of Minneapolis and the state take it on themselves to do this, but then, guess what, they would then be branded as vigilantes locked up or killed by the same gubment thugs.
What, pray tell, is your solution?
Obviously, there are terrorists. Almost every terrorist act, when you look beyond the headlines, the story almost never adds up. I don't know why people can't apply the most basic metric of who benefits?
What terrorists are you trying to root out anyways? I won't beat around the bush and say it: most (all?) terrorism has state origins. Definitions of insanity should include asking those creating a problem to be the ones to fix it.
I understand that "the state" is a big opponent. However, its power comes solely from the peoples' *desire* (not coercion) to give it power, which is what you happen to be doing looking for solutions to things that not everyone (like me) agrees are problems.
Right.
Correct.
I do. I know who benefits. I don't think you do. And there in lies the rub.
Mostly muslim extremists, leftist delusional drug-addled wannabe assasins, and the occasional explicit "splinter cell" type.
No. But also yes, if you consider the Caliphate to be the muslim "state" as such, then yes. All terrorist actions are started by the state.
I don't expect the ones creating problems to solve them without presenting another problem right after. (See covid and them the BLM riots, etc.)
Yes! You are correct. People cede power to "the state." I very much agree. The abdication of personal responsibility always leads to disaster. Amplified several billionfold when it is happening all over the world.
My solution for this particular issue is super simple, but it won't be done. These people (all foreign people who are committing or planning to commit theft, rape, and murder) should go back home and culturally enrich their own country. Please and thank you. Then we might have a chance of not collapsing so badly like every other empire in history. (We are overdue, in historical terms.)
Allowing these terrorists to hide their identities is half the reason they are so damn violent.
No consequences for their actions.
Just understand the people making excuses are pedophiles.
They know Trump raped 64 children and they know ice are being used to traffic children
They are not working as individuals they are working for the government.
Big difference.
Giving the government extra privileges and removing citizens rights does not protect anyone.
What extra privilege am I assigning to the ice agents wearing face coverings?
I've only been saying that EVERY HUMAN has the right to do that if they wish.
So... What rights am I supposedly removing from citizens?
nostr:npub1q6ya7kz84rfnw6yjmg5kyttuplwpauv43a9ug3cajztx4g0v48eqhtt3sh should log off and go spend a few years at study before he fucks up the world even more.
Public SERVANTS have ZERO right to privacy...
... and, btw, thats also what YOU are:
thugs goons gangs do of course in all countries
