6f
jhog57
6f41976e0f371a5358b624cda7a5fb4d922528c97ae29f3e5213bcf9e195260d
jhog57

bailout to bailout

or block to block

tick tock

what percentage of people still believe that buying shiny rocks of unknown composition would teach bankers a lesson?

Replying to Avatar corndalorian

jokes on them users, they can fuckin write the code themselves today

Replying to Avatar Bitcoin News

PETRODOLLAR'S FUNERAL: WHY THE SILVER SPIKE SIGNALS THE END OF GLOBALISM

In less than 30 days, silver has added roughly $1.3 trillion in nominal value.

On Friday alone, we witnessed a massive 10% jump, a rare 4-5 sigma event, that propelled silver past NVIDIA on Sunday night to become the world’s 2nd largest asset, with a market cap exceeding $4.65T.

Beyond the eye-popping move in a multi-trillion dollar asset, we are witnessing the cracking of a decades-old narrative.

The belief that the fiat experiment could run unabated and that the world would indefinitely accept pieces of paper for real-world goods is dissolving.

Silver gave the world a massive warning on Friday: the status quo of the last 50 years, the petrodollar standard, is ending.

The power players may try to hide it behind headlines, but they are now openly vying for control using realpolitik.

The Return of the Monroe Doctrine

In the last two months, we’ve watched the Trump administration pivot from bombing narco-speedboats in the Caribbean to launching a full-scale embargo of Venezuela.

Trump didn’t campaign on a "hot war" in Latin America, but if you read the latest strategy papers coming out of the Pentagon, a new Monroe Doctrine is clearly in play.

The haphazard plan that began with April’s tariffs has crystallized into a subversive, strategic decoupling from China and a pursuit of complete resource control over the Americas.

If Washington intends to weaken China while shoring up its own hemisphere, it must sever the Middle Kingdom’s access to its new favorite extraction point: Latin America.

The Metals War

China’s domestic silver mining is declining, making their reliance on Latin American silver concentrate a critical vulnerability.

They sense what Trump is up to and have been buying everything, from iron ore to oil to silver, in order to stockpile against the threat of a full-blown trade war.

Meanwhile, the US officially designated silver as a critical mineral in September.

This was a formal recognition of silver’s irreplaceable role in electronics, defense, and the energy transition.

That brings us back to Venezuela.

The US has already seized two Venezuelan oil tankers and is pursuing a third.

The initial excuse of targeting sanctioned vessels is giving way to a new reality: any Venezuelan ship may now be seized by force.

Washington launched this embargo because for years Caracas has been selling oil directly to China, bypassing the petrodollar system.

Simultaneously, Beijing is preparing its own countermeasures: a plan to restrict silver exports starting in 2026.

Even Elon Musk recently weighed in, tweeting his concern over silver prices; he knows he needs the metal for Tesla’s batteries, Starlink satellites, and SpaceX hardware.

A Monetary Regime Change

We are unraveling globalism in real-time. Trade is bifurcating into "Access vs. Allies."

We face a binary choice: maintain the post-1971 USD reserve structure, or devalue the currency against commodities to ensure we have the raw materials to actually build things in America again.

We cannot have both.

If we choose to build, a neutral reserve asset like gold or Bitcoin must replace US Treasuries as the primary global reserve.

The market is already voting: gold, silver and bitcoin are saying, "We choose building; reserve status be damned."

This is a monetary regime change.

The Austrian framework of scarcity, sound money, and real price discovery is exposing the fraud of the prevailing model.

Silver is the old-world stress test. Bitcoin is the new-world one.

As the system's fever breaks, the question for every Bitcoiner remains: when the next fracture hits, do you want exposure through paper wrappers... or do you want the thing itself?

silver’s price is bank-managed

retards still trust banks

real sorry to hear that, try your best to escape the germany and get better

find it so funny and sad that eu managed to swallow the whole USAID pill of totally fake and made up american values with a smile but when it takes to ingesting the actual american values like 2nd amendment they suddenly gotta be reluctant AS FUCK

let’s #3D2A more firearms in 2026

it really was a shitty fuckin year

the “greater good” of private individual disarmament was totally worth it, all we have to pay for it is millions of lives lost every 40 years or so during gigantic genocidal fuckin wars

but worry not we will never include those in the statistics

Replying to Avatar Alex Gleason

I find this propaganda piece amusing, however let me ask you this

this fella right here halted progress for about 20 years but somehow he is not being hated, not at all, how come?: https://blog.pangeanic.com/alpac-report

buy as much guns and ammo as you possibly can

europeans pay a small price to live in a gun free zone:

to have a bloody fuckin war every 40 years or so

by the way, bloody fuckin wars are usually being excluded from statistics too, how convenient?

admins of this fascist website(reddit) hated internet archive because it contained a snapshot of truth which they didn’t wanted for anyone to see

they will simply classify everything they don’t like as murder or terrorism

called politician a moron? boom, terrorist

went outside for a ride with your electric bike without insurance? THOSE COULD EXPLODE, definitely a terrorist

if you ask me, I’d say private individuals should be able to own fully functioning fighter jets and war planes, similar to how it’s done in the US but an actual functioning units

well, yeah, you can’t do much against an ICBM, it largely is a demoralization type of device, it sure could and it does kills lots of people at once, but the demoralization aspect of it is even bigger and you are going for miles to expand on that fear. it is just it is something you can’t exactly win a war with either, because there is not much of a point of turning a country into a a wasteland as it will become unusable

sure, there will still be plenty of resources, but not much people you can use to harvest them

I don’t necessarily agree that the centralized army should be completely eradicated or abolished momentarily, that will surely help your enemy, but am strongly against less guns=less violence narrative, for disarming everyone EXCEPT for the government and am sure is against collectively owning firearms through government EXCLUSIVELY, I hope you do understand that

what I am saying is to keep your 2nd line of defense (your police, your army, your allies) but make ABSOLUTE SURE that your 1st line of defense, an armed trained and prepared individual to be there as a first and foremost priority

again, I also am against fear mongering for ICBMs and using that as an argument for disarmament, I just don’t see how would it promote any conclusion other than “we better disarm and give up if we want to live”

5th grader with a basic knowledge on physics and chemistry could figure out how to make a firearm all on his own

without manuals and instructions

should we ban kids from accessing school courses of physics and chemistry?

or should we teach gun safety in classes and raise kids to actually trust their peers

how to spot a communist:

he acts genuinely surprised when presented with a real world examples how free firearm sales protected ownership and improved lives instead of starting anarchy