Polls on #nostr that use sats as votes: stupid, useful, revolutionary?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Who gets the sats?

I would prefer recieving Sats for my precious opinion than paying for being able to answer. 😉

Sure, but paying mitigates the problem of bots spamming polls to make certain opinions appear more popular than they are

Let's say not optimal!

I think it's odd that the amount of sats impacts on the results of voting. Not the amount of voices, but more money = more vote.

Votes don't matter. Anyone can vote even a million times 1 sats each

Poster could zap themselves millions of sats too so they are both worthless metrics.

Therefore, you should only participate in those polls whose creator has a high social trust rating 🤔 And at the end, double-check the results by removing bots and rich people 🤣

Maybe polls could have an option to pay sats to a (potentially neutral) third party. Still manipulable but slightly more auditable.

Everything can be checked now, but I agree it would be even easier with a third party 😅 Another job for our hero nostr:npub1cmmswlckn82se7f2jeftl6ll4szlc6zzh8hrjyyfm9vm3t2afr7svqlr6f

🍋

> amount of Sats = Proof of Stake mentality

> amount of Votes = Proof of Work mentality

‘Nuff said🫳

Why do I care what someone's vote is?

The poll creator should choose how much sats per vote and it should be 1 user 1 vote.

Meh

I agree with the comments below. Voting should cost a set amount of sats so we get an actual bead on what the vote really means. So I guess it's stupid if it's just a question of spending power and who is willing to outspend their counterparts. No set amount of sats likely means more sats for the poll creator.

Plutocracy :D

I think it's kinda stupid as a default, but can be really useful in specific scenarios with specific parameters

Depends what the vote is for.

Wild, 😂

I hope nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc after this stupid vote spend all the money on charity, or at least beer 🍻

The more drunk you are, the more money you will spend on charity. Win win!

I can confirm. Don’t drink and zap🫠

The only way how to reasonably transition to AI internet without 1984 KYC and surveillance. The internet (X) will get much worse before it gets better

Meh, wenn ich zur Wahlurne gehe, sehen die auch keinen Cent von mir. Meh

Ist n netter Denkanstoß, vielleicht gibt es irgendwo ein Problem das wir damit lösen.

Denke eher nicht, dass sich dies durchsetzen wird.

All your previous notes were polls too just with a different layout and people didn't pay to answer...

In our defense we must say fun and useful. We made ours to combine art and tech in a small peace of code representing the importance of the bip39 seed phrases 🫶🏻

The sats should be distributed among the voters of the least popular choice.

Depends on the use case. Polls with zaps are rather stupid, because it kind of is PoS. The more sats you have the more power.

Ofc you could say, hey but if you spend more sats you deploy more votes. But (sats) poor people don't have money anyway. So they cant spend money on anything really.