I'm experimenting with a new podcast where we discuss a host of intriguing ideas from the edge.

Here's the first episode with satellite.earth founder nostr:npub1lunaq893u4hmtpvqxpk8hfmtkqmm7ggutdtnc4hyuux2skr4ttcqr827lj!

https://fountain.fm/episode/E8PW5z2yVPzNBN2b44Kr

We discuss a wide range of topics including: Terence McKenna, the world of language, evolution, Web of Trust, and the future of Nostr. At least two big ideas really clicked for me: 1) Nostr as the substrate for digital evolution (i.e. forking with checkpoints) and 2) Nostr as an API for market intelligence.

This was a ton of fun to make! I hope to do this regularly with Stu and many other interesting folks. Feedback and ideas for future episodes welcome πŸ™ ⚑

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'll definitely check this out!

πŸ™

Looking forwards to diving into it :)

Legends

πŸ™

Great episode!

πŸ™

Instant sub

Nice!!

This one with Stu is also good:

https://fountain.fm/episode/RYgLafaJOVtMn5udZOIA

O yea! I listened to you guys and it was one of my faves πŸ˜ƒ Definitely a big inspiration to have Stu as first guest

We gotta do another rip soon nostr:npub1mygerccwqpzyh9pvp6pv44rskv40zutkfs38t0hqhkvnwlhagp6s3psn5p!

Yes! Let's do it. I'll ping you on signal

Language and Web of Trust 🧐

Sounds right up my alley! πŸ˜ƒ

πŸ‘‰πŸ» pgf.tech πŸ‘ˆπŸ» using webs of trust to curate decentralized digital languages

bc language can be modeled as a series of pseudo-arbitrary questions (what symbols do we use to represent things?), and WoT is the ideal tool to answer pseudo-arbitrary questions in a decentralized fashion (ask your trusted frens what symbol they use for something and calculate a weighted average to settle on an answer)

Have enjoyed all the podcasts you've been on so definitely adding to my queue.

Paleface Stu needs a steak or two

πŸ˜‚

We had some delicious pho!

πŸ˜‚

Reserved a spot on the playlist!

Just listened to this excellent ideas tossed around thanks for sharing.

nostr:npub18lzls4f6h46n43revlzvg6x06z8geww7uudhncfdttdtypduqnfsagugm3 and nostr:npub1lunaq893u4hmtpvqxpk8hfmtkqmm7ggutdtnc4hyuux2skr4ttcqr827lj touch privacy and radical honesty but I think they missed a crucial point - radical honesty requires anonymity and privacy. They are not the opposite sides of one coin - one requires the other, at least in this stage of human society.

One could argue that assassination markets, or their product - assassination politics is the purest expression of radical honesty.

nostr:note1ktn8vcg29dlqr282t6jh8hngske57v7cm0cylzphd6hfy2rkgq6s0mf0l2

> radical honesty requires anonymity and privacy

In a political context, yes. When dealing with strangers, security is a precondition for honesty. Maybe it's a bit more complex when considering the interpersonal or even "intra-personal" dimension.

Yea these are both great points. Honesty with "others" requires a real choice, for which privacy seems a necessary precondition.

Being honest with oneself is tougher. But that may also require the option of being private until someone is ready to confront "oneself"

nostr:note1ktn8vcg29dlqr282t6jh8hngske57v7cm0cylzphd6hfy2rkgq6s0mf0l2

Very cool! looking forward to listening to this πŸ’œ

πŸ™

Gotta get you on soon!

Just dropped it into the queue, can’t wait to listen.

πŸ™