The neat thing about voting is that whether youâre a liberal art ho communist barista or a maga Q anon Marlboro trucker you both get war with iran.
Discussion
Facts. Anyone that doesnât hate all sides of the government and decide to trust any part deserves this:
Find Saftey in sats
AIPAC makes sure of it
Arenât people supposed to be smarter on this platform? Nobody wants war with Iran. Everyone should want regime change. The current regime suppresses the rights of Iranian citizens, and funds terror proxies throughout the Middle East and the rest of the world. So, when you imply that propaganda drives us to all want this war like it isnât in the best interest of the western world, you sound completely ignorant. We educated people all would love regime change before the Iranian extremist terror funding government has a nuclear weapon. If you can let the world know how to achieve that peacefully, that would be great. Otherwise, let the brave warriors keep us all safe.
Youâre right about one thing no one wants war with Iran, itâs the deep state that wants this war.
No one denies Iranâs regime is repressive, but history shows that externally imposed regime change rarely leads to liberal democracy. Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan prove that such interventions often produce chaos, not freedom.
Assuming war is the only path to preventing nuclear escalation is a false binary. Diplomacy, containment, and internal reform support have historically proven more stable and effective.
In terms of being educated. True education means recognizing that good intentions do not justify disastrous outcomes.
On the other hand, our wars with Iraq Libya and Afghanistan were effective at preventing regimes from defecting from the US Dollar Standard and generating wealth outside of that economic system. So maybe they worked, just not for the reasons publicly stated.
how did they "work" exactly? do you know how much they cost the american tax payer, how much money had to be printed? who benefitted from it? and i'll just ignore the part in your note where millions of innocent people die so they're "prevented from generating wealth"
Fair answer. The only part I take issue with is comparing Iran to Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan. Iran was a predominantly Christian country before 1979. Many people alive remember the old Iran. I think the people of Iran will make it so that the outcome of ousting the existing regime is a positive one. I also do understand how people donât see that dealing with the Iranian problem now before they have a nuclear weapon is in the interest of the USA.
The people are supposed to be smarter on this platform but they're not
Humans are extremely sick and retarded and can't get basic stuff like decentralization right it turns out
You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous of which is ânever get involved in a land war in Asia,â but only slightly less well-known is this: âNever go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!â
âNobody wants war, everyone wants regime change!â
No subversive jew, only parasitic israel wants regime change
Tom Woodsâ iron law of politics: no matter who you vote for, you get John McCain.
Yes.
Because you are not free.
You are living under the brutal dictatorship of an Israeli PM.
No matter who you vote for you will get John McCain.
đ âneatâ
never was about right or left. its always the money masters ensuring they continue to enrich themselves while the stupids fight over silly issue.
Vote harder next time!