How are bitcoiners supposed to lead any sort of peaceful revolution if they won’t speak out on the easiest and most blatant government tyranny/vioelnce?

You realize why the world looks at us Bitcoiners and says “they were only here for number go up” right?

Incredibly disappointing.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

IMO it was/is all about the incentives / game theory.

Which tyranny?

You’re getting closer, Trey.

government is tyranny

Most people have a hard time applying their principles on behalf of those they dislike.

The number of “well aktually the state some times has to use violence” bros is out of hand. There is no reason to attack protestors, and when fucked up shit happens a non predatory state would move towards correcting injustice instead of stonewalling and making excuses.

It’s sad to see the bootlickers, but it’s even more sad to see the podcast classes silence on this shit.

If you can’t defend freedom from tyranny because your enemies are the victims you don’t want freedom.

By pushing open source and decentralization, it is basically against any form of dictatorship

You can’t claim to build exit ramps from tyranny while refusing to name it. Leadership means saying the uncomfortable thing before it’s popular.

Its ok for Bitcoiners to not be interested and therefore not speaking out.

Its not ok to defend the mad man in the white house.

Any Bitcoin support should have stopped after Trumpcoin

Im at the point of believing we need a total victory in the battle against the state.

If we can win the money fight that will still be worth it.