Pubiky is competing for the same user base as nostr, but its dev is so scared of failure that he won’t even let people try it because he already knows they’ll hate it. 😂

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Even the name is highly regarded. Makes me think of pubic hair.😆

😂😂

😂😂😂

I dont hate it

Yes actually I do... i like buttorrent tech a lot and the dht mainline holds a lot of familiarity for me... plus the key signing is super clean and partitioned

If p2p nodes build appropriately, there's a really robust network for indexing there

Gives early bitcoin build meets pirate bay vibes

Buttorrent lol i hate android keyboards that 4 sure

Seems he should want more people to try it then.

I didn’t know people weren’t able to try it…

Wait… have you even tried it?

Yes I have like 6 active personal indices running on it

It’s only available to try by invite code.

You can literally ask John or the pubky team for an invite and they will give you one… permissionless protocols do not equate to permissionless coercing of server space

There are hardware limitations in p2p networks and it’s expensive af to host a server

Access codes bottleneck bad actors that would destroy the protocol instantly by coercion of hardware space

Nostr is built off of relays and TR L1s… the only reason this is possible is bc there was an early Satoshi era where people built nodes

Just like what will happen with the execution of pubky… its literally no different

You’re just farther down the line and able to piggy back off of 14 years of early development work that you didn’t see take place under the hood

Nostr doesn’t run on Bitcoin nodes and has only been around for about 4.5 years.

nostr is just P2TR repurposed

^^^ you wouldn’t have nostr/zaps w.o taproot, you wouldn’t have taproot without LN driven development, you wouldn’t have LN without bip 0001, and you sure as hell wouldn’t have any of it without Satoshi peer node 1

Well then how about not dunking on people like John and his team who are v intelligent and putting forth an insane amount of energy and resource to build a censorship resistant P2P cryptographically secure protocol- calling pubky permissioned is active defamation of FOSS development {which fine… but don’t do it from a platform of self righteousness}

If you really support decentralization, user freedom, and sovereignty then you support a future where permissionless P2P protocols exist in the HUNDREDS… otherwise it’s just leeching off of NGu tech

Because John is an insufferable asshole who likes to insult everyone who dares to counter his opinion or question his intelligence. If he wants to dish it he can also take it. Why is your head so far up his ass as to jump in and white knight for him? 😂

Because I like mainline DHT 😂 and I believe in Satoshis original vision

All I’ve seen is John arguing with and insulting anyone who wants to try Pubky 🤷‍♂️

Talks shit about nostr, on nostr. But a meme mocking him gets a mute. He cant take the heat. He should go back to play with his little invite codes

He’s here to be agreed with.

He’s here to tell us nostr sucks. And we’re here to agree with him 😂

If we were smart we would be building on Pubequay

Let me ask for permission to use Pubegay first

Ok let me know when you hear back from Pukeghee

All I need is an invite code and I’m set

wen??

Soon ™

He don't want to give me a invite code 🤣

He gave me one last week, before I made the memes 😂

pubiky? pubky?! ist this https://github.com/pubky the stuff? https://www.pubky.org

Youre doing better than most gj!