There's at least one DNM using LN ( Tor-based instance of nostr:nprofile1qqs2xugc5jyguqkj36rk0syv4tmnkjdtmtperttl7x9rqjy3ustdcvcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qg6waehxw309aek2mnyd96zumn0wdnxcctjv5hxxmmd9uxa0uz8 ), so it can't be 0%.

If you can see the flow of transactions (and thus are able to compare currency flows to those of other currencies) on a DNM, it's not private.

People spend Monero more because it's worse money (Gresham's Law).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If it's worse money, then what is the point of spending it in the first place?

If you're already holding it, it's better to spend the bad money over the good money. If you have nothing else, you'll have to spend the good money.

These guys really need to read up on monetary theory.

I wouldn't say worse money, I would say easier to replace.

Monero incentivizes a circular economy because anyone easily can mine it, or buy it from the same places you can with Bitcoin*, and it's more affordable*, it's used as cash more because it has the more cash like principle, lightning feels more credit like in my opinion.

Monero maintains a more reliable price point, and gradually increases overtime typically, so it's more predictable as determination of price.

(*DEX, Kraken, and Some ATMs)

(*currently)

Do you really think that who is using Monero is one that has bitcoin and everytime thry have to do a transaction makes a swap? 👀

You don't know Monero community for sure..

That is the excuse that your fav influencers say to have an argument for this, but its not applied here, if that was the case Monerists would be using FIAT 👀

Its not because it has an onion adress that the service is a DNM service..

All DNMs are used for is to deposit or withdraw transactions. No one is using them as their personal wallets. If Lightning was on DNMs it would have the same issue.

If the reason DNMs are adopting something was because of Gresham's Law there would be much better(worse?) crypto to do that with than Monero.

It's the strong default privacy and relative ease of use vs the alternatives.

Lightning wouldn't have the same issue in that case because there's no transaction trace on Lightning, but there is on Monero.

Gresham's law only applies in the context of a market that accepts both Monero and Bitcoin (or any other currency). If the option is there to pay in Bitcoin or Monero, most will choose Monero because it's worse to hold. If the only option is Monero, then that doesn't apply.

DNMs typically have custodial wallets (the market itself is escrowing funds for the sellers and buyers) so that would make zero difference (this is how markets exit and rug everyone in the first place). You would have the same situation of no privacy from the market for any funds on it.

So DNMs just decided to switch over to a coin with a tiny fraction of Bitcoins liquidity for fun? DNMs had to decide to introduce Monero in the first place out of all the other crypto alternatives out there. They weren't simply doing it because of Greshams law. Strong default privacy in a highly adversarial environment and very cheap transaction fees were the real reasons.

Not if the escrow is an ecash mint or a market of agents.

And sure, you can adopt it for those technical reasons, and that is the free market at work, but in the long-run I think it won't hold as a reliable currency for reasons not just tied to privacy. In the future, Monero will probably be utilized as just an intermediate swapping currency (which ecash mints can already act as and in my opinion will evebtually supercede the usage of Monero), but even in that case people don't want to hold it, they want to get rid of it. Cash is a perfect comparison: I use it because it's more private than my credit card, but I don't want to hold it. This is most obviously evident with the XMR/BTC price chart. I'm not arguing that Bitcoin is better at privacy with this point (though, there are ways to make it more private), just that it is better money.

Maybe. We'll see what happens. I really don't care as long as it has strong privacy, is self-custodial, and relatively easy to use.

Lightning uses onion routing.

Tor implemented onion routing, which Lightning copied.

Try reading the Tor whitepaper, it's right there at the beginning what onion routing can't protect you against: a global passive adversary.

A GPA has existed for many years. It's called the NSA.

Onion routing doesn't provide you with the privacy and anonymity you think it does, sorry.

(but it's better than nothing)

Completely agree. The best way to preserve your privacy and anonymity online is to not use the internet.

Yes, but that's not what I meant, and I think you know it.

Look at https://nym.com for one example of what could become the golden standard.

Technology progresses, both offensive and defensive. The people who run the DNMs and the people who use them know well that LN is not sufficient, and that's why they don't use it.

This is the free market doing its thing.

Try not to look at this like "XMR rocks baby, LN sucks!", but more like dispassionately observing and acknowledging the facts and adjusting your threat model accordingly.

Yeah, I don't look at it in the way that one is better at privacy, so hence the other is bad; it's more of me saying Monero isn't AS good as those who love it say it is either (as we've seen with some evidence of deanonymizong/tracing back transactions), so users of both need to adjust their threat models.

I have other issues with Monero that I believe make it unsuitable for a secure and reliable market currency in the long-run. Free flowing, uncensorable markets should be the default, not just darknet sites for others to search out for, so they must be accessible and have the ability to spread rapidly, which I think LN and ecash allow for more readily (while still preserving privacy, albeit not perfectly) as they are tied to a much better money.

They both have their issues and their workarounds, for sure.

Personally I find Monero easier to understand so I prefer to use it, and as long as there is a non-centralized bridge back and forth between Monero and Bitcoin, I am happy.

Different tools and competition between them is a good thing imo. People will choose as they choose, for their own reasons, and one way or another, they will reap the benefits or suffer the consequences of their own choices.

I think it's harder to ask for anything better than that 👍.

This is the way; the free market at work. 🤝