nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4a6q6xvt4wuv0wpdpfr336e4fweldtu6np3ehpw55h83xuw2h2zs59ne8y nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqwcrkh83weg7y7f2r27q027ca2eyu05yt0pxzp7tv8p86plk9g4hsq7kvtp nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqyv54qfj70fhwkxul7zuqyztvutmegqsdjychan3fp6hsdyvmgpjsaz7vjn
IMO this shows that base layer privacy is a bad idea. FCMP have been talked about for 2 years now and they are still 2 years away.
This should have been done years ago. Privacy needs to nimble and up-gradable in a moments notice. This is why I am more hopeful with privacy on BCH going forward.
In what way specifically is it a bad idea? Optional privacy on BCH would face the same challenges, but I still think you guys should do it.
Well, that's when the discussion of FCMP started, but it's been less than 2 years since it actually got put into motion. And considering it will be implemented before the end of the year that's pretty damn fast.
No replies yet.
