Replying to Avatar Saberhagen The Nameless

Btw it's way more than 1000. With FCMP every single transaction on Moneros blockchain going forward becomes your decoy. Huge improvement.
Avatar
CashDragon 9mo ago

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4a6q6xvt4wuv0wpdpfr336e4fweldtu6np3ehpw55h83xuw2h2zs59ne8y nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqwcrkh83weg7y7f2r27q027ca2eyu05yt0pxzp7tv8p86plk9g4hsq7kvtp nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqyv54qfj70fhwkxul7zuqyztvutmegqsdjychan3fp6hsdyvmgpjsaz7vjn

IMO this shows that base layer privacy is a bad idea. FCMP have been talked about for 2 years now and they are still 2 years away.

This should have been done years ago. Privacy needs to nimble and up-gradable in a moments notice. This is why I am more hopeful with privacy on BCH going forward.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
onthephone 9mo ago

Which is it? Layer 1 privacy sucks, or BCH privacy is the bomb?

Fyi, I don't think anyone is hating on BCH, But each crypto has it's own ++ & --. Realistically, using multiple, decentralized blockchains that have varying privacy features has benefits for the agorist, libertarian & privacy communities by providing both universal & esoteric options for transactions, as well as more potatoes on the hill.

Avatar
Saberhagen The Nameless 9mo ago

In what way specifically is it a bad idea? Optional privacy on BCH would face the same challenges, but I still think you guys should do it.

Well, that's when the discussion of FCMP started, but it's been less than 2 years since it actually got put into motion. And considering it will be implemented before the end of the year that's pretty damn fast.