Big blockers had valid concerns about scaling at the time, but their solution wasn't a valid solution.
Look where it leads. Imagine you're trying to run a full node at home and the storage requirement is increasing by 400MB every ten minutes.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=864x1081&blurhash=_6SPb3M%7B-pRiRjxu-%3B%7EqRjt6xaofRjE100xu_3ofxutR-q-%3DWBoLofozRjM%7B4Tj%5BxuM%7BWBoft8%25Mt6WCt7xuRjRjIAjsozM%7CRjxt%25MRjj%5BR*oyxuRjM%7BRjRjRjRjNFs%3Bxu&x=626392145b4eab328fcccaa2e495d4e8e6a8f588477a4d24e7aa8f49ef7f87f5
Payjoin. P A Y J O I N. get the chant going, the sooner someone makes a p2p protocol for coordinating them the sooner we slash on chain payment costs. I mean, a lot, we can realistically squash 128 into the space of about 32. That's an 6x reduction.
Yes! More elegant solution than "MAKE BLOCK BIGGER!"
a payjoin L2 needs to be built.
Thread collapsed
also, before schnorr signatures, it wasn't possible. In fact the patent ran out not long after Bitcoin was launched but it wasn't until musig that they came online.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
No, you see, that makes too much sense. Trust me bro, Im new to Bitcoin and I'm here to fix it
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed