Nostr Web Client

NVK has become a bad actor.

He is the kind of guy who does shitty things and then laughs as if that makes it okay.

He encapsulates "why you mad bro" behavior

You can tell how entitled he is anytime he opens his gaggling mouth. The constant laughter is Kamala Harris levels of deflection.

Rather pathetic from someone who could be on the side of free open source software

Coinkite muddied the water of what FOSS is on purpose

I just listened to Odell comment on NVK creating websites to undermine seed signer and avoided saying the word "Foundation" ( as if they were the problem here somehow) only reinforced my opinion that NVK is the bad actor and they just salty

The logic isn't sound. How can you be upset at a company for doing the exact same thing you did?

Coinkite took foss and created coldcard

Ten31 invested in the product and receives dividends

Foundation took foss and created Passport

They got vc money too

But only foundation is bad cause they did exactly what coinkite did?

Every company in the world has competition. Why does coinkite think no one is allowed to compete with them in a free market with free open source software?

They made an entirely different product. I thought user choices were good. I thought profitable open source was the point?

So instead of simply being happy with a massive market share and competing to keep it, nvk does all this petty bullshit that only makes him look like a little bitch.

This kind of shit makes me never buy any coinkite products ever again. I simply don't trust that kind of bullshit.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

SPA (Super Phat Arrow) 5mo ago 💬 1

NVK is ODELL's blind spot and something Matt is always picking the wrong side of because "it's hard when he's my friend"

Maybe get better friends.

nostr:nevent1qqs04hwsp4tmvl484zxu3dp4tmssnczfge43akdsgd2ag6qesze649spy9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumr90p5kuem5dahxy6t5vdhkjm3wdaexwtczyrkmgup8z2t6cknp7fml8ng5me2vvl44enfqauxemu5muxrgtwcqgqcyqqqqqqgahmgvg

+rapidlab309 5mo ago 💬 2

Hard pass on Coinkite’s products.

It’s all advertising.. what software supports Tapsigner that was launched 3 years ago?

Q is a huge fail:

https://x.com/rapidlab309/status/1775372186196279539

semisol 5mo ago

I have done an analysis.

It would cost about $5000 to perform a supply chain on a Coldcard at most, and that is the fixed cost. The per device cost is something like $25.

There are multiple vectors to conduct a supply chain attack on a Coldcard and there are no defenses possible against it.

The secure elements used have been proven over and over again to be vulnerable to 2-decade old attacks.

I may publish a proof of concept once I have time to waste on this crap and I am done with nostr.land and a few other projects.

semisol 5mo ago

Disclosure: I am working on my own HWW product and may have some conflict of interest.

This uses a proper SE with customized firmware and a chip that has security certification.

I may be able to open source the SE software.

REUZ 5mo ago

What better alternatives for Coldcard are there at this moment in your opinion?

semisol 5mo ago

There are none.

Passport I feel like is a gimmick that isn’t worth it.

Passport Prime even more so.

Jade Plus seems reasonable to some extent. Original Jade is trash.

BitBox has weak SEs.

Trezor is problematic in other ways.

Ledger is Ledger and anything that is not the Nano S should not be trusted

REUZ 5mo ago

Thanks! Didnt know about the weak SE on Bitbox. I reckoned the old Nano S with Sparrow Wallet (not ledger live obv) might actually be allright to continue to use (even tho it doenst get any further updates anymore) considering the Nano S doesnt have the 'seed recovery firmware'.

Im curious to your HW project! :)

szarka 5mo ago

Ledger Live: The limited memory of your Nano S restricts access to the latest shitcoin features. Upgrade to a newer Ledger device.

Me: No, thank you.

Jay 5mo ago

There are a lot more things that go into security than just your hardware wallet. It's just one component, and managing who has physical access to it and always using it in a private location with airgapping features go a long way imo. And that's just with a single sig wallet. Two wallets from different brands and a remote key from someone like Nunchuk is also an option.

People are good at scaring folks into thinking their hardware wallet is a single point of failure when it doesn't have to be. If you're losing your Bitcoin, it's probably not because of the wallet you chose. Unless it was a ledger, lol.

REUZ 5mo ago

I haven't heard stories about people losing funds on Ledger tho , only some defi breach last year.

Jay 5mo ago

Me too, actually. I just heard the news of the private key allegedly being accessible remotely or something. Maybe it was just FUD.

I had a ledger once and it bricked itself. So there's also that. I don't recommend them.

REUZ 5mo ago

Where did you see or heard that news about private keys being accessible if I may ask?

I do know the Ledger Live software was data harvesting, which is a big issue.

The company doesnt seem to be trusted but until now, to much intertwined with shitcoins

Jay 5mo ago

Seems like it was two years back. I would hear news about how Ledger introduced some kind of recovery service for private keys. But looking into it now, they rolled it back and just recently came out with an offline recovery card of sorts.

https://crypto.news/ledger-delays-release-of-private-key-recovery-service/

https://shop.ledger.com/pages/start-recovery-key

REUZ 5mo ago

Yeah that's right. That was the moment a lot of the more hardcore customers left (rightfully so I think). Ledger is clearly focusing on less tech savvy general population, which makes sense from their perspective ( a lot of people actually like the opportunity for a recovery service). Still I dont think their hardware or firmware ever gave an hacker or another actor the opportunity to steal the seed phrase (besides obv risky behavior by wallet owners). The company has been in this space for quite a long time. Still I wouldn't buy from Ledger anymore

Baerson 5mo ago

So a hard pass because of politics or because of product?

+rapidlab309 5mo ago 💬 4

NVK can not be trusted.

nostr:nevent1qqs04hwsp4tmvl484zxu3dp4tmssnczfge43akdsgd2ag6qesze649sprdmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdakj7j0ddpu

unknown 5mo ago

So glad I never have that guy a fucking dime

unit 5mo ago

I reached out to coinkite to learn more about their Q wallet

And, the first thing out of the representatives mouth was how Foundation wallet is a piece of crap and not to pay attention to their Twitter account

deeznuts 5mo ago

Ironically BitKey is a better product when it comes to your non technical wife trying to recover your BTC after you are hit by a bus.

I can imagine 50% of CoinKite wallets will be lost bitcoin because it’s too fucking nerdy

Jay 5mo ago

There's probably an Odell mafia. Even if they didn't want it to be that way.

syntaxerrs 5mo ago

This seems a touch salty.

Momo 5mo ago 💬 4

I’ve hated NVK for so long that I never wanted to go near his products even though they were provably high quality.

Thankfully, the space has matured. There’s real competition now and I don’t have to rely on him anymore.

So fuck NVK — and I can’t stand that Kamala Harris laugh of his either.

Funny how today wasn’t just my last straw.

Someone else’s “trust” broke too, for entirely different reasons.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpmd5wqn399avtfslyalne52du4xx066ue5sw7rva72d7rp59hvqyqqs04hwsp4tmvl484zxu3dp4tmssnczfge43akdsgd2ag6qesze649sum9vxz