📣Official statement: the new EU chat controls proposal for mass scanning is the same old surveillance with new branding.

Whether you call it a backdoor, a front door, or “upload moderation” it undermines encryption & creates significant vulnerabilities

https://signal.org/blog/pdfs/upload-moderation.pdf

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I would get off signal now

Why? Signal is fighting against this E2EE encroachment.

Why? Signal is in fact protesting against such regulations or policies that will undermine encryption and privacy.

they are obviously warning everyone to get off their platform

They are warning everyone that encryption will die on every platform if this is passed as a law. That means that any communication done via any platform should be un-encrypted by default or looks like someone (mostly the dev) should take accountability for un-encrypting it when any govt institution requires it, else it will not be usable in EU.

This is how I am reading her statement. I think we should support Signal in their fight against such insidious policies, because this will come to impact Nostr at some point.

that's why you get off "platforms" and use open source only

Signal is Open-Source...?

I think you wanted to say something federated 🤷

how are they going to add a back door then

Well that's what the EU wants to happen, Signal won't do it :P

Nor sessions

Session still suffes from inferior cryptography ever since they've switched away from double ratchet.

The app is different from the oxen crypto.It's works a lot like nostr with nsec/npub keys

if suffers from the fact that libsodium (their encryption library) is inherently weaker than something that implemebts the Double Ratchet encryption algorithm. The most notable deficiency is that it doesn't to Perfect Forward Secrecy, meaning if *one* of a chat's keys leak, your entire chat history leaks, not just one message.

These are important things that they've failed to address.

What is yall’s opinion of SimpleX ?

I use it and I like it.

Uses double-ratchet from Signal + some neat quantum resistance stuff, uses user-selected relays to send messages and doesn't use persistent user identifiers. Lots of metadata privacy to be had :)

Is it good for day-to-day use like to talk to my family, for example?

I would say yes, just make sure you select the kind of notifications you want

generally yeah, unless you're looking for some more fun social features (stickers for instance)

If a public key can be found using a private key, is there a possibility that institutions with the best mathematicians cannot reverse engineer it and apply that as an algorithm depending on the type of encryption?

But also, it gets you off iOS, Android, Windows. We need a Linux smartphone...

True

I would get off Europe now

🍻

communism 2.0

this happens in the middle of Euro2024 right?

It has been happening for a long time, but the "expert group" that proposes this law is trying to push it through now, right during Euro2024 :/

Please do not bow to this disgraceful & unlawful tyranny 💪

How does this affect signal users ?

Just like with the online safety bill, Signal will (legally speaking) leave the EU. Should EU countries try to block Signal they'll do what they can to let us still use signal, see #iRanASignalProxy for example

Signal is FOSs? If so they have no legs

Signal is licensed under the AGPLv3 and as such, Free and Open Source.

Its code, same like law

you can't exactly make maths illegal anyways 🤷

Revolution time

I'm in for a fight against this - as programmer and hacker 😎

"Signal is licensed under the AGPLv3 and as such, Free and Open Source."

Correct. Unfortunately it's also rigidly centralised. So state-level actors only need to block one set of servers and it's unusable (eg Signal is very hard to use in China due to the Great Firewall). Matrix is a better bet, both E2EE and Free and Open Source software, *and* a decentralised protocol anyone can implement.

Terrible to see Govts and institutions putting resources and money and minds into breaking privacy of citizens instead of focusing on real crimes, terrorism and other threats that are right in front of their eyes.

To these people, I say - There are always going to be bad actors - so evolve your methodologies to catch them in the act and punish them instead of undermining everyone’s privacy in the hope that you will somehow “prevent” something even before it happens.

We're living in the "brave world" dude! TV shows kinda a good example

EU supporters all claim to "believe in europe" like you believe in a religion. The EUSSR is all about concentrating power in a few unelected hands and furthering their control over all aspects of our lives. #Frexit #Spanexit #Italexit

Communism - the smelly, broke cousin of fascism.

"Communism - the smelly, broke cousin of fascism."

Kind of, but not the way you think;

https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66d99b6cd4991eb8a6d39ac6

Also, hilariously irrelevant to the topic. The problem here - just like with "age verification" laws in the US - is quite clearly conservative pearl-clutching ("think of the children"). Weaponised by corporate DataFarmers, for whom robust privacy protection is bad for business. lt has fuck all to do with Communism, by any definition.

nostr:npub15s3hussvmv9nyvw3w8lg0x72udazmdat7tcj5vmmjafnwcvv8tpqzz6r6y I want to zap your post(s) but you don't have your wallet set up! Let us reward your important work with some sats ⚡️.

That's because the post is bridged from Mastodon 🫠