more than 10 signatures: https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-30.0/SHA256SUMS.asc
only your sig: https://bitcoinknots.org/files/29.x/29.2.knots20251010/SHA256SUMS.asc
anyone can verify that themselves, weird thing to lie about
Discussion
You can’t reason with mentally ill delusionals hashtag Bitcoin’s savior hashtag ardent catholic aka the global boy rape cult
There are 3 signatures in the Knots 29.2 signature file.
Your brainless retarded comment only shows your 0 intellect.
looking forward to seeing the outcome of this conversation.
nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgqgzx3h is my opsec spirit animal, and nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7cnjvghxjme0qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcqyr7at68k4cxms9a7pdca5gzf3svqd95d3fj9j4vuyj0nyta8x3j2whad7ya is (I believe, having met him a couple times) morally pure and technically proficient.
I would be impressed if they could both minimize the rhetoric, and deliver their thoughts in a clear and structured way instead of bickering back and forth in threads.
Odell, you've got a huge platform and a lot of skin in the game. It's weird to punch down on an awkward man who's devoted SO much. I'd encourage you to be careful of a crowd of sycophants appealing to your base instincts, and to listen with an open mind. Consider that you were likely groomed into the place you're at now, whether you realize it or not. Talk to Francis about this, your stories might have more significant details that you already realize.
Luke, don't let the haters get you down. I'm sitting on the sidelines with v21 & waiting for further conversations but very much willing to roll over to Knots should the opportunity persist.
nostr:nprofile1qyx8wumn8ghj7cnjvghxjmcpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqqg9enk72qxz2xt89tyzvkfnmytjrfq3ujl6p3umd4awjmlcd676uyukldzya suggested a soft fork to remove OP_RETURN, and I'd consider that as well.
Who could productively mediate this conversation? Whoever it is, I'd like to see the Core Devs left out entirely. Likewise, I've heard enough from Mechanic and the rest of the cheerleaders (on both sides).
It’s signed by Luke and bigshiny90@gmail.com
Bitcoin’s sole intent.
Let’s keep on task please.
3 sigs as of this morning.. more guix happening. What are you even talking about?
3 signatures and counting, verified myself. Did you?
he swapped the file, look at the timestamp of the last sig
glad there are more signers
Signature file on GitHub says it’s 4 hours old. Did you verify when it first came out I guess?
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoinknots/bitcoin/releases/tags/v29.2.knots20251010" | jq '.published_at'
"2025-10-10T23:19:47Z"
That’s when the release was published.
The signature file was updated at my local time 8:57AM today. Odell’s tweet was at 9:51AM.
Sounds like a misunderstanding
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoinknots/bitcoin/releases/tags/v29.2.knots20251010" | jq '.updated_at'
"2025-10-13T13:57:16Z"
Correct
And for reference Odells note about only one signature was at 2025-10-13T13:28:25Z and 30 minutes later 2025-10-13T13:57:16Z the signature file is updated on github with 2 more signatures.
The 2nd signature was created 2 days ago. Not sure when it was added to the GitHub release.
https://github.com/bitcoinknots/guix.sigs/tree/knots/29.2.knots20251010
Yes. I am just correcting my criticism. Odell does in fact know how to read a text file 😂. The file was swapped out after he checked it.
👍 nice everyone shake hands.
nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyvhwumn8ghj7um9dejxjapwdehhxenvv9ex2tnrdaksepv2a6 come up with a better reason why you don’t like knots
Looking forward to a 3rd implementation, I hate core more than I love knots.
Not that anyone cares about my opinion, but I think the reason for the lack of consensus with core vs knots is became everyone is arguing over tradeoffs.
It's a tradeoff between decentralization and censorship resistance.
We can't have 100% of both. There is a dial in between and where should we set that dial.
I don’t agree with that framing, filtering out a certain class of txns (spam) isn’t censorship.
Censorship is filtering out individual txns based on individual characteristics.
Filters have been around forever, they’ve been working just fine.
The busy body dumbfucks at core should have left things alone. If they wanted to tinker with fun little open source projects they should have found something else and left my money alone.
Filtering out a certain class of transactions isn't censorship (agreed), but it does resemble ad blocker behavior which is a form of centralization. In ad blockers, they all query a centralized list, or have trended to do so. Gov can put pressure on anything that is centralized. Yes filters work. That's the problem and solution unfortunately. Hence tradeoff between censorship resistance and decentralization.
To be fair to him, judging by the timestamps, it doesn’t look like it was done as a response to your note.
But a few days ago was just a single signature.
Shiny signed it 2 days ago atraxia an hour-ish before your note
https://github.com/bitcoinknots/guix.sigs/tree/knots/29.2.knots20251010
Are you gonna give it a try now? 😄
I attested all Knots releases since v25.1. knots20231115.
Haven't attested v29.2.knots20251010 yet because it just came out. Thanks for the reminder.
There we go.
7 signers (so far) for Knots v29.2.knots20251010.
https://github.com/bitcoinknots/guix.sigs/tree/knots/29.2.knots20251010
Just keep running core 28 or 29 if you don't like knots
this still does not prove that bitcoin core is not compromised. the ethical thing to do is to push for no core upgrades