Avatar
LordAjax
0141f8a78740559419e7bf583d2299863267532bf9dd819cb51369f075098b77
Wannabe philosopher.

I didn't say "an income"--I said the income needs to "beat inflation".

You need extra money so that you can save for a rainy day. Depending that the income you currently have will be around forever, or that you will have the ability to do it forever, is just silly.

Yes, many can get to that "extra" by living frugally.

Yeah, that doesn't work.

I do agree that living frugally is a VERY good tool for happiness and financial freedom.

But (as MAHDOOD says below) you also need an income, or investment that will "beat inflation".

"No, it is the conservative laissez-fairist, the man who puts all the guns and all the decision-making power into the hands of the central government and then says, 'limit yourself'; it is he who is truly the impractical utopian."

For A New Liberty - The Libertarian Manifesto

Murray N. Rothbard

Replying to Avatar Jestopher

And I fully support you paying for it.

Replying to Avatar Luke Dashjr

I want to make public my concern about "NFTs" which are being sold utilizing my name. Recently, a picture of code I wrote was sold at auction for .41 BTC. It was advertised as my code in the listing and presented to the public for sale and profit. Let me be clear – I was not involved with the creation and sale of this or any other "NFTs". I have not consented to the use of my code or my name for this purpose. Instead, 3rd parties are marketing my name and my code for their own monetary gain. Worse yet – they are creating confusion in the marketplace to the extent that the auction “winner” contacted me and stated: “Think I won your auction? 😊”. Stop using my name to mislead the public so you can make a quick buck. It’s wrong.

The public should also be aware that the seller and/or auction site offered me a donation of 90% of the auction proceeds “should I choose to accept” it. I feel this is a clear attempt to: (1) bribe me into silence; and/or (2) obtain my consent after the fact. I will not accept such payment at the expense of the public who are being misled. I will not accept any such “donation”.

Due to the misrepresentation involved and actual buyer confusion, I strongly insist upon 100% of the auction proceeds to be refunded to the buyer.

I felt obligated to speak out, not just for myself, but for other Bitcoin devs who are being placed in similar situations. The amount of money we have been offered as “donations” for acquiescing to what is taking place is considerable. I do not condone it. I do not consent to the use of my name or code for this grift. I want the public to be aware of where I stand.

I want to do whatever I can do to limit the damage which will inevitably be caused by this confusing and misleading behavior.

I can appreciate your principaled stance, but not sure what you expect to happen.

Do you honestly think you reduce this kind of behavior by any significant amount by demanding the money is given back?

I think you are doing more by just warning people. But maybe that is you're main intent.

It looks like intellectual property is pretty much going the way of the dinosaurs with AI generation, the ease of copying, ungovernable money, etc..

I've started several businesses; and I can count on one hand the number of weeks I've worked over 40 hours.

But I work for myself because I'm lazy, and some businesses are easier than others.

Must you keep droning on?

This worked for me I think. Are you seeing my avatar?