Avatar
Fabio Krauss
02d1b483d21f2ddf7fc02e912fdabd1abf294e1bc775fafe3d5bbedb905e053a
Product Manager by day, 🇩🇰 builder and Indie hacker by night. Husband and Dad 24/7 https://spoofdefender.com

#gm #asknostr

What did Santa bring you this year?

#asknostr #portugal #gig

Looking for some data about Uber rides in Portugal.

I'm paying 0.60 eur per valid receipt.

Constraints:

* Must have been a ride in Portugal (and completed)

* Must have been in the last 3 months (> 2025-09-01)

* Must have costed more than 10 eur

How to submit:

Fwd the trip receipt to uber.outrank950@silomails.com alongside with a lightning address or npub.

Once I validate the data I'll send you the satoshis!

Questions, just drop them here :)

#vibecoding

This month I've been trying out venice.ai

Pretty cool service. You get to try a bunch of different open source models with a pretty slim UI (not that clunky hugging chat). Kimi, GLM and even their version of Mistral's latest.

The promise is still uncensored AI and privacy focused AI; they are almost there (all models are just using other inference providers) but it's pretty good to try.

I don't think you will throw it all out afterwards. It is still a good thing to keep and prototype on as you evolve.

The main drawback I see on replit: it skews you into using their infra. But that doesn't mean you can't hire a developer (or even cursor) to change that. One can develop on replit and commit code to GitHub, which makes you free to use cursor (and also replit) for evolving and making it more robust.

But that doesn't mean you'll throw it all out. It might just mean that your workflow switches to cursor and you work together with developers on the same repo.

A second drawback I see is that replit and cursor are both in one single repo. As your feature set grows it makes it harder for the models to be fully aware of your context. Here again might you may hit a point where you want to hire someone to help you restructure and architect the code. It is not incompatible with the cursor idea i shared above.

If I were in your place I would start by

1) dual development - replit and cursor - because it creates the foundation in GitHub for you to collab with a developer. You'll start using issues, actions etc. You'll gradually turn replit into one part of your dev cycle

2) start looking for a dev that could help you structure the code and architecture.

All in all you don't need to ditch replit completely but you can grow further than it's vanilla usage

It's incredible how even though most parents agree their kids shouldn't be in social media, few would actually enforce it themselves.

Then they delegate the responsibility to the gov.

Which, naturally, always has everyone's back and it's totally not going to turn into a surveillance state 🥸

We need to start pushing "real" because it automatically makes non milk fake milk.

Once that is out, the question must become " do you want regular milk or raw milk?"

"do you want that with regular milk or oat milk?"

There's only one answer to that question: WITH REAL MILK

#carnivore #asknostr #gm

GM Nostr!

Something you can't find on Spotify... Damn drm and licensing deals

N.I.B - Primus & Ozzy Osbourne

https://youtu.be/U122lh0ODFU?si=wq-W86tQhwmDSgbu

The only downside is that some services treat you like a criminal for using it. But you can bypass it easily with a custom domain/subdomain.

Extra points for being super easy to create shared accounts with loved ones (like your mom's bank account).

Hey, I've been vibe coding some stuff with replit.com, do you think I can use Shakespeare on it as well? I'm curious to see how it would review the current codebase given it's specific nostr context/knowledge

I'm keeping the code in GitHub itself