Adam Back turning out to be Satoshi would be just as bad as Craig Wright being Satoshi. Both would be a complete and utter disappointment.
Pedophiles & trannies
I am headed to argentina to check out the crypto scene
My sweet summer child, you are so naive. Once they did it and got away with it, they now know they can do it whenever they want and compliant cowards will obey.
Although #BrokenMoney is about money and finance, I dedicated a full chapter to the topic of privacy.
It covers government financial surveillance, surveillance capitalism, the frequency of data breaches, Snowden, Pegasus, Chinese export of surveillance tech to dictators around the world, etc.
Surrounding chapters are about CBDCs, encryption, and the intersection of financial technology and human rights so it all kind of flows together.
I figure that most people won’t read a book about privacy but if I can stick some privacy-focused content into a money book that will indeed reach a wide audience, it’ll educate a lot of people on the topic that weren’t otherwise looking for it specifically.
cc nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx and nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc 
bitcoin has broken privacy though
Why do you prefer nix over guix?
No, you don't understand science. Science proves its facts through observation and repeatable experiments. You believe something blindly with full faith, which is neither observable or repeatable through any experiment. You are the religious one.
You can't and absolutely do not, at best you make estimated guesses which can never be conclusively proven because nobody observed the big bang and nobody has successfully repeated the creation of a universe through a "big bang". It is a pseudoscience and quasi religious because you blindly believe it with out any proof of its truth.
An actual scientist would just concede we don't know how the universe was created, instead of clinging to a pseudoscientific quasi religious belief system based on unobservable and unrepeatable theories which can never be proven
You believe the bog bang happened billions of years ago which is not observable or repeatable
The keyword in ypur response is test. Through observations and repeatable experiments. You can't do that with something that allegedly happened billions of years ago like the big bang
If it is not observable or repeatable it is not science. This is a new age religion which you guys are believing solely on faitj
Localmonero.co if you have cash, if you have crypto, one of the non-kyc exchanges on kycnot.me
I might have a similar "accident" later today
God does not favor those who esimp for virtual cookie
mfuckin e-whores nostr? really?
nah, strike is dumb for making a bitch made kyc'd paypal 2.0 app. wtf does your legal name have to do with spending or receiving bitcoin?
nostr:note1ltcgyynprhstzgsju4fp3yr9gcc7yr5xsa4p5mtr4am060ckr5dq9x8ckz

