In the case of DAO, I was excited at first and was one of the people who invested in 'the dao' project.
But from seeing a few projects in action it seems like it all boils down to 'democratising the organisation' through different mechanisms for determining voting rights.
I personally don't think that is a good idea, I prefer anarchy to democracy.
Pills, obv
Oh, I feel you.
Just recently got a wedding invitation card that's basically the first Canva template.
My 8yo is at her first sleepover at her best friend's today's.
they grow up so fast
discussing optimal op_return byte sizes with nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk 
Men, talking about their preferred size.
The OP_RETURN discussion is not new and dates back to 2014 when Bitcoin Core 0.9.0 was released with the OP_RETURN policy included which was intended to discourage more egregious forms of spam. At that time, 40 bytes was the default max datacarriersize limit across all node implementations; this was and still is sufficiently large for tying data to a transaction (32 bytes for a hash and 8 bytes for a unique identifier). Core subsequently increasing the default to 80 bytes was an entirely voluntary decision and in no way contradicts the design objective that OP_RETURN creates a provably-prunable output to minimise damage caused by data storage schemes, which have always been discouraged as abusive. There are also other good technical reasons which I have chosen to retain the lower default in Bitcoin Knots, and no justification for increasing it.
It is not my intention, nor that of my team at
nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze, to filter coinjoins. These present an innovative tool for increasing Bitcoin’s privacy and, when constructed properly, coinjoins can easily stay within the OP_RETURN limit (indeed, there is no reason for them to have *any* OP_RETURN data at all). I have some ideas on how to alleviate the recent issue where some coinjoin transactions were flagged as spam from Knots v25, and I am willing, with the full resources of my team, to work collaboratively on a solution in good faith.
Bitcoin does and always has allowed nodes to set filters based on multiple sets of criteria and Knots v25’s defaults are IMO what is best for Bitcoin at this time. Others may disagree and that is ok. They are free to (and should) run their own nodes - it is good for Bitcoin to have more people running nodes, including miners, and there should be a natural diversity in node policies. As was stated before, OCEAN is on a path to decentralization and very soon we are going to be in a position where hashers will be able to fully participate as miners and perform the intelligent parts of mining such as deciding which version of node software to run and what filters or other policies to apply to block template construction.
May i have more context? What did I miss?
Spent a few minutes on Facebook (went looking for an old post) and damn... it's a bad way to start your day.
So.
GM. nostriches, thanks for being a part of a better network.
The liberals want
Free lunch
Free education
Free healthcare
So much so theyvare willing to give away their freedom.
True use case for it is criminals, drug traffickers, anti-money laundering and tax avoidance. Break it down.
https://video.nostr.build/fab89f588fc617fbb7e0ee36901491edc9c281530602e85f6fcbb905b275bda6.mp4
Turn it up!
😂
Jamie isn't concerned for the people, he's just worried about his market share.
One of the environmentalist cult's favourite tactic is to frame energy and natural resources as finite and limited, totally disregarding the natural water cycle, the carbon cycle and many other natural cycles.
Take the recent attack on Bitcoin's 'water consumption' for example.
The 'news articles' approach Bitcoin's consumption of water as if it's burning, splitting water atoms for energy. (The process actually requires energy)
When confronted with the issue, people supporting the notion would shift to talking about how there's only a small amount of fresh water in the world and they are essential for all of our survival.
Well yes, only a small percentage of water in the world is 'fresh water', true, true,.... But! Have you ever stop and wondered why that is the case? Have you ever stopped and wondered where all those freshwater came from? Cause it surely is not flowing out from your government's orifice!
And so they would go about promoting all these 'renewable energy' and guess where that energy is from? An actual friggin fireball burning itself up in space!
