Avatar
Medici
0f5302eeb46ee1fcc237d675f9f4ba4cd572315005559d46a4a491e5a63e8dad
Old man, still learning, Slowly as is appropriate for an old man, and incompletely as is appropriate for all men.

A nostr Friday morning for an old man still learning - futzing around with a new Private Nostr RS Relay on StartOS. My brain isn’t full yet, but it does take more effort to put things into it.

#grownostr

#plebchain

#nostr

I have set up a private relay on StartOS with the Nostr RS Relay package.

It doesn’t seem to work when I have tried to attach to the relay with:

ws://

.onion)

I can attach with the local address, but this is not recommended.

wss://

.local)

Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks,

#relay

#nostrrelay

#relays

#start9

A community of like-minded people informing each other about value has always been the natural state. It, itself, is the ‘true leader’. To believe such community is informed by a spiritual leader does not explain anything. Zizek belief of our natural state doesn’t make sense to me. And his philosophy elevates the possibility of a populist leaders. As communities of like minded people navigate the conflicts among themselves, our history is made. Best we can do is share what makes sense to us, listen to what makes sense to others, and act where it is necessary. Keep up the good work nostr.

I am learning nostr. Best value I have found is to follow specific hashtags, such as ‘#relays OR #nostrrelays OR #nostrdev OR #nostrdevs or #nostrprotocol OR #nostrhelp OR #relay OR #nostrrelay NOT #nsfw NOT #boobstr’

If you create nostrobserver to follow hashtags in this way, I believe many might find value in it.

#Reformed #Christian #grownostr

Most people, following Strauss, believe our current political system and civil liberties were derived only from Enlightenment principles. Christians who rightly reject some Enlightenment presuppositions then wrongly go on to reject their conclusions.

The most important political principles of our (de jure) federal government, and the civil liberties that government is prohibited from infringing upon, were established long before the Enlightenment in the long history of Western Civilization from Greece and Rome, through England, and especially by the Calvinists of the 16th and 17th centuries.

One of the most important reasons why governments must be limited is the Calvinist teaching regarding total depravity. Lord Acton put it famously like this: "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely." It is precisely because all men are fallen, that all men must be prevented from establishing a tyranny.

What the Enlightenment did was reject the doctrine of total depravity, but they wanted to keep the logical consequences of it in the political sphere that we gained from the Calvinists. In the words of Johnny Cash: "they say the want the kingdom, but the they don't want God in it." But given the presuppositions of Enlightenment philosophy, where is the danger? Why must "Power" be limited, distributed, enumerated?

The proper ground of our political philosophy and our civil liberties is the moral law of God as known and knowable via natural revelation / natural law and conscience. We all know what the 'other guy' is supposed to do, even if we let ourselves off the hook when we do the same things. But knowing how people 'ought' to behave, and having fair means of correcting deviations, is enough to run a just--if not peaceful--society.

My 2 sats.

#liberty

Where is the ‘. . . fair means of correcting deviations’? When the means reveals itself, I dread that it will not be fair.

I am learning on my Raspberry Pi V4 with 4GB Ram. It has been a couple of days and I have about 40% of the Blockchain. I have had to restart it a couple of times, but so far it is running cooler (mid 50’s) than it did when I was running a Lightning Node with RaspiBlitz. If it works out I will probably spin up start9 on an old Mac mini with 16GB Ram and a SSD.

I would like to install PIA VPN on my new #start9 server running on a raspberry pi. Anyone have any experience or advice about proceeding with accepting “DIRE CONSEQUENCES of doing so”.

I ran to this when I first started:

THIS IS NOT A STANDARD DEBIAN SYSTEM

USING apt COULD CAUSE IRREPARABLE DAMAGE TO YOUR START9 SERVER

PLEASE TURN BACK NOW!!!

Is the relay menu something at becomes available after installation of the Relay? Is it available to see elsewhere?

Anyone using the Nostr RS Relay from the Start9 marketplace? I am looking for advice on setup and configuration. Any site you might share on the subject would be appreciated.

#relays

#relay

#start9

I should have said it was my great nephew (~20 years old) who looks for moral clarity in the events of today. As the young person he is, he believes that there is some eternal, transcendental truth existing outside of our experience by which we are able to make sense of our experience. Being an old man, I was no help. I beleive that the sense we make or our experience is within the communities we share our perspectives which allows for the emergence of our shared reality. The will to power has always made more sense to me than the unmoved mover.

I take myself to be more of a skeptic than a critic regarding democracy. I agree that some measure of the expression of the people’s ‘will’ seems necessary to satisfy the definition of democracy. Perhaps that could be done by vote, but I reject the assumptions necessary to synthesize a totality of votes into an expression of the people’s will.

I am all in with the transparent technologies that allow for communities of like minded people to emerge through the exchange of ideas. The technology you are building may have some value in the communities that accept that technology. In those communities where it is imposed, I will always have doubt.

Thus I am here, on nostr.

My nephew wants to talk about how to find some moral bearing in the many confusing narratives of the phenomena of our experience. I told him that morality and rationality seem similar to me. They are both what emerges within a community of like-minded thinkers sharing their perspectives. Those things exists only within the narratives of those communities. Whether those communities persists depends on the benefit their narratives convey to the members of those communities. We will talk tomorrow.

Nostrs, let us continue to share and allow those things which will benefit us to emerge.

#nostr

#plebchain

#grownostr

Replying to Avatar Brett Morrison

We're excited to share what we've been working on - the TrueVote app in action!

TrueVote is not just an app; it's a commitment to transparency. Built on Bitcoin, Opentimestamps, and Nostr, our open-source platform ensures tamper-proof ballot data. No smoke and mirrors, just verifiable election integrity of every ballot, every vote.

TrueVote solves two fundamental problems in elections:

1. Ballot verification: With TrueVote, you can verify your vote was counted, eliminating the uncertainty that plagues traditional voting methods.

2. Convenience: TrueVote brings voting to your fingertips, eliminating the inconvenience of polling places and mail-in ballots. Voting should be as convenient as the rest of our digital lives.

We believe in openness, which is why our tech stack is entirely open-source. Transparency isn't just a feature; it's a virtue. We're empowering voters with unprecedented visibility into the voting process.

Ballot data is validated using Opentimestamps hashing on Bitcoin. No "token" needed. No "new crypto coin" needed. Bitcoin and Bitcoin only.

And now, TrueVote uses Nostr, an innovative decentralized and open-source communications protocol, for secure authentication.

Technology (bitcoin) has made it possible to separate money and state, and it is time to decouple the state from the election process to ensure election integrity.

It's time we vote on our phones!

#TrueVote #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionTransparency

https://twitter.com/morrisonbrett/status/1726618612633591902https://m.primal.net/HQmk.mp4

Until you can identify the authority that will separate elections from the state, I will continue to believe that what you call the two fundamental problems with elections are not bugs from the prospective of those running the elections.

Can you say more about how it is an exercise in Hegelian dialectic? I laughed at it like the boomer I am, but it has been too long since I read Hegel to catch that relationship. Thanks