Avatar
RedTailHawk
1549ed4be71d1a70ea2dca4596cd0c54c61aea485c6e4e5a8ca463758c98dd4a
Mathematician, elite math teacher, & energy engineer. Researcher, writer, and mystic. Chaser of rabbits. Solver of mysteries - see links below: Discovering Bitcoin #147 (my background): https://fountain.fm/episode/xFWL4gtmJ2cfF4v4U5tw Paradigm Drift #5 (research): Short: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kVP13d5MZe0 Bookmarked Full Episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OA5CHQTfOA&t=2255s Paradigm Drift #6 (research): Short: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFB_FSanru8 Bookmarked Full Episode: https://youtu.be/rLYsN3SMJ-o?t=7258 Once Bitten #562 (research): https://fountain.fm/episode/xJhmGJwLayW0ADEwmU2L Illegitimate Scholar 074 (research): https://youtu.be/-ksbeU4InZM Link below to Flight Club: a Sunday spiritual study group on Clubhouse. Sessions are recorded and will be released as podcasts. https://www.clubhouse.com/house/flight-club-aeg58h1l7sb6?chs=QKlU4Z4pWa%3A162m6aw2UBc-Y_38pxL36vmjIQ78UBQVqgi1qMuq7KQ Suspended X Account: @RedTailHawk1923 Pleb since block 465,941

Found it. It's a website client. I went looking for an app but didn't see one.

Logged in on Jumble making this post.

Seems I was able to hover over the spot where it said "Pinned" and when I did so, "Pinned" changed to "Unpin". Clicking that unpinned the post.

I'll see if I can duplicate it.

I'm going to assume that "jumble" is a nostr client?

Is this message to which you are replying "pinned" to the top of my profile or something?

If so, I don't know which client I used to do that and this is why NOSTR is so frustrating.

Wow...that green candle on the right...the lower wick...

The greenish triangle shows the diagonal line of the head and shoulders formation that is close to completing.

We just dropped to within $40 of hitting that diagonal, but we stayed above it so the head and shoulders formation has not completed.

We have almost no margin for downside movement in 5 figure territory.

If we don't hold above $99,500, we're completing a head and shoulders formation that technically should drop us to around $84k.

Wall St money is here and they play by their legacy rules. Head and shoulders formations are for sure baked into any trading algos out there with anything resembling "big" money under management.

Is it just me or does the Worldcoin branding look like the devil's pitchfork poking through some portal, fishing for souls?

😅

Label the devil as the central banking cartel and the portal as the iris scanner and the mapping is complete.

On the hourly candlesticks, we bounced below the lower Bollinger band, wicked less than $100 below the $100k mark, and popped right back up.

2 minutes left to go before the hourly candle closes. Right now it's looking like a green hammer candlestick pattern which is bullish. Even if it's a red hammer candlestick or a dragonfly doji, those are all still bullish.

I'm also seeing some bullish divergence on the RSI.

I'm not too studied on that but I like the ending. Number go up at the end from what I'm being shown about Wykoff patterns.

🫂

The struggle is real.

Teaching is second nature.

It's the hardest thing to have knowledge that would be helpful to others and waiting for them to come ask you the right questions.

That's a very clean way to avoid imposing and only giving what is requested. It doesn't mean you're being stingy by only giving what is requested either, because you're open to more questions.

I think people are often afraid to ask questions because they're more afraid of betraying their ignorance which they think makes them look bad than they are happy about having the opportunity to dispel some quantum of ignorance and look forward to living with a slightly less distorted perspective.

If we drop to somewhere around $99,578 or below, a head and shoulders pattern completes which should theoretically drop us to roughly $84k.

6 hours from now, that level will be lower because the shoulder line for this head and shoulders formation is a downtrending line.

6 hours from now at UTC midnight, the level to hold above will be $99,159 for completion of the head and shoulders.

$100k is an important line to hold right now.

Given that you're posting a line graph rather than a candlestick chart, and given what you said in the OP, I have to wonder if you understand what arbitrage trading is, what spreads are, etc.

Do you think that there is, at any given point in time, one single BTCUSD exchange rate?

There's not. It's like the planets of the solar system moving together with the sun. Market participation occurs at different exchanges and not all market participation is evenly distributed so some exchanges will get slightly more or less action than others at any given point in time. This makes each exchanges orderbook unique and when prices top out or bottom out, the raw numbers are going to be close but slightly different.

Consider that councils of dudes in slick robes and weird hats who lived 300+ years after Christ may not have had everything right.

Consider how different the US is compared to the US 250 years ago.

Consider just how distorted things became during the Roman persecution of paleoChristians.

Consider that “canonical” means the same thing as “fiat”.

Consider that “loving your neighbors as yourself” entails openly exploring your neighbors beliefs and practices, not prejudicially dismissing them as demonic simply because they are unfamiliar.

Consider showing some interest in what happened during the years not accounted for in the canonical gospels by looking into sources that suggest that Jesus travelled a lot and studied all over the world.

Quoting Wookiefoot, "There's only 2 ways to learn in this life: when we get burned by the fire, or, we see the light."

It’s gonna be in the book. The book is the place to lay it all out. Perhaps it will need to be multiple books. Idk. We’ll see how it goes.

I’m not a lawyer but as a mathematician I do have something in common with lawyers: we both communicate in the language of proof.

I had a pretty wild highlighting scheme for this esoteric textbook.

Replying to Avatar JdM

No.

19 followers...1 mutual...ignorantly dismissive...yeah that adds up to I don't care about your opinion at all. Goodbye and muted.

They like mixing in lies with truths to keep us off balance and keep all of the intellectually dishonest and lazy masses from figuring out the full truth. They know most people only read headlines and don't actually do any deep research. The few weirdos like me who actually do deep research will be dismissed by the government school educated masses. They'll lean on the bandwagon fallacy because they couldn't name 10 logical fallacies to save their own lives.

Having said that, there is an ongoing geomagnetic excursion. The US Air Force has known about this since 1947. There is a huge magnetic anomaly in the south Atlantic that is growing. It does impact our climate in major ways. Yes, there is an anthropogenic component to climate change but compared to the sun and the magnetosphere, the anthropogenic component is a nothingburger.

There is a cosmic, periodic event ongoing and "the elites" know about it. I know why they're building bunkers specifically in New Zealand and Hawaii.

No but a brief Google search summary of her suggests to me that she may have been rather based. I don't know how much of her stuff counts as "baby" and how much counts as "bathwater" but thank you for putting her on my radar. She looks like a person of interest worth checking out.

Would zap but I'm limping through an electrical issue that is affecting my lightning node and I'm too much of a noob to figure out how to work around it completely. I was recommended to at least create a coinos.io wallet and plug that in so I can temporarily receive zaps but I don't know how to set that up to send zaps.

You may find the Tree of Life interesting.

I believe it is what "Jacob's Ladder" refers to.

It is said to consist of Divine attributes that we may embody in an attempt to be more Divine ourselves.

The attributes are called Sephirah (singular) or Sephiroth (plural). Note the resemblance to "Sapphire". Many consider Kabbalah to be Jewish but it is in fact Egyptian. Moses brought knowledge of this to the Abrahamic tradition. It is the reason that "kingdom, power, and glory" are referenced in the Our Father.

The Sephiroth are:

Kether/Light (enlightenment)

Chockmah/Wisdom (masculine)

Binah/Understanding (feminine)

Da'ath/Knowledge (gnosis)

Chesed/Mercy (feminine)

Geburah/Power/Severity (masculine)

Tiphareth/Beauty (heart/love)

Netzach/Victory (masculine)

Hod/Glory (feminine)

Yesod/Foundation (aether)

Malkuth/Kingdom (physical reality)

Replying to Avatar Ava

Thank you for sharing that. The naga/serpent symbolism across traditions is definitely worth exploring... you're right that I'm studying and can speak Sanskrit and Chinese, and those archetypal connections interest me.

I haven't gone down the Churchward/Mu rabbit hole, so I can't speak to those claims. My practice has been working with texts in their original languages: Aramaic (Peshitta), Greek (Thomas), Sanskrit, Pali, classical Chinese etc—and then exploring their mystical dimensions.

Translation always loses something. You have to go to the source language to find the depth of meaning.

What draws me to the Aramaic debate around shabaqtani is that we can examine the actual manuscript and see how one root word authentically carries multiple meanings. That kind of textual ambiguity creates space for mystical interpretation without requiring unverifiable historical claims.

The serpent appears everywhere: kundalini, Eden, the caduceus. Those symbols speak to something real in human consciousness, regardless of whether there was a continent called Mu.

In the end, words, symbols, and myths are just pointers. People worship the pointers, build shrines to them, but don't actually go where they are pointing. As far as religious institutional control is concerned, this is it.

Someone can describe the experience of a beautiful sunrise from the mountaintop, but words cannot give you that experience. Until you're standing there yourself, you have to rely on belief in the experience of others.

The guru is only there as a guide, to help you find your own path up the mountain. Once you have your own experience, there's no need to believe in the experience of others. You have the experience, the direct realization. This is the real teaching.

Exactly. Translation always loses something which is why it's good to go to the source. In this case, the source language goes back 50,000 years. Basically Churchward found himself in the endzone looking up at a Hail Mary pass and caught it but almost nobody knows about his work. He went boots on the ground Indiana Jones mode for like 50 years in the late 1800s and early 1900s inspecting actual archaeological sites, engraved stones, temples, etc. Very important work and worth any seeker's time and attention if you're ever looking for something interesting to dig into.

Words are very important. They morphologically branch off from one another.

A great example is the word "macabre". Macabre clearly derives from Merkabah. Merkabah and Kabbalah are sibling teachings. Each teaches us how to balance the Divine Masculine (ka) with the Divine Feminine (ba). On the Tree of Life, Vishuddha is represented by the hidden Sephirah called Da'ath. Da'ath, morphologically, is a match for "death".

So, the esoterically uninformed translation of ancient emblems of "mortality" found near sarcophagi led to a distortion of understanding in the great game of "telephone" of human transmission of information through time. Kabbalah gained a connotation of being associated with mortality due to this esoterically uninformed translation. That connotation transferred onto the sibling, Merkabah, which eventually yielded "macabre".

I think Christ's death was a critical point in history for many reasons. Linguistically, his dying words created a linguistic fork because nobody present understood him. People guessed. Someone thought Christ called for Elias because Eli sounds like Heli. Matthew and Mark guessed. Matthew spoke Aramaic. He wouldn't have had to guess if it was Aramaic. So, they guessed and then people took that guess as "gospel truth" (pardon the pun) and the rest is history. That may be wrong but it makes the most sense to me given the totality of facts presented.

Thanks for confirming your linguistic abilities. I know you said it was on your list to check out at some point, so whenever you get to it, you'll find that I connect dots between Chinese, Japanese, Greek, and Egyptian. Major points of interest include:

-Mu is a character in both Greek and Chinese.

-Ancient Greek (pre-Euclidian) pronunciations of the Greek alphabet resemble a flood narrative to anyone familiar with the Polynesian family of languages.

-Mu, in China, can mean tree or wash. Churchward points out that Mu, the motherland, was a civilizational hub with colonies. They likened Mu to a tree that bears fruit from whose seeds new trees, or colonies, sprout. The fact that Mu sank in a cataclysm and was "washed" beneath the ocean gives rise to the other meaning of Mu.

-The Rebus principle applies to both Mandarin and Egyptian.

-The Mandarin Zhong, Japanese Naka, and Greek Phi are all topologically equivalent.

-Naka means center, middle, within...conjuring spiritual concepts like "center yourself", "the middle path" and "the answers are within". Naka is also morphologically equivalent to...Naga.

-Chi, Rho, and Phi represent the Div Masc, Div Fem, and Div Child/enlightened being. These show up in many places including Hero, Hera, Heracles, Chiron (who "taught" Aesclepius, among other heros), chariot, hierophant, hieroglyphic, and Cairo.

Another fun one is djinn. Pretty sure that one is also related to Vishuddha. Djinn gives us genuine, engine, engineer, ingenious, genius, genie, gene, generate, genetic, and many other words.

I agree. Words are pointers. They say that when the guru points at the moon, the imbecile examines the finger. I think that wisdom needs some nuance injected into it because it is not imbecilic to examine the finger if one's intention in examining it is to determine as precisely as is reasonably possible what it is pointing to.

There's a saying. Numbers don't lie but mathematicians use numbers to tell lies. I've "memed" that thought somewhat. Liars use words to tell lies but words themselves contain profoundly deep truths.

Pleasure conversing with you, fellow seeker. Respect.

🙏

Turned out to be arrow splittingly accurate based the screenshots I have been able to grab today. Not only did it play out this way, things I thought might happen but didn’t mention happened which was even more confirmation that I actually learned a thing or two in the last 5 years practicing TA.

This is a can of worms, fren. Big question here.

Just about everything warrants study but I can maybe help reduce your scope for you.

It's a 3 hour listen. It's got a lot of lingo in it so you might have to treat it like a lecture or seminar, pause, take notes, look stuff up, etc.

https://fountain.fm/episode/xJhmGJwLayW0ADEwmU2L

Replying to Avatar Ava

This has nothing to do with Gnosticism versus the faith tradition created many years later in the name of Jesus... though, they didn't even get that right. His name wasn't Jesus.

The name Jesus came from a series of translations and transliterations. He was known in Aramaic, his mother tongue, as Yeshua Bar Yosef (Yeshua, son of Joseph).

We haven't even begun to talk about Gnosticism.

Anyone who has studied mythology and symbology for any length of time will immediately recognize the motifs running throughout the Bible. These patterns show up across cultures and spiritual traditions, centuries before Christianity existed.

You're quoting John 8 to interpret Genesis. I'm reading Genesis as it stands.

Genesis 3:22: God confirms the serpent told the truth. "Behold, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil."

You can interpret that through later theology created by the founders of Christianity and the religion they created ABOUT Yeshua, or you can read what the creation myth of Genesis actually says.

The Genesis narrative has multiple source traditions woven together. Scholars identify at least two distinct authorial hands in the text, though some argue for four separate sources commonly known as J (Yahwist), E (Elohist), D (Deuteronomist), and P (Priestly).

The tale is rich with ancient symbology that predates later theological interpretations, similar to how the story of Noah and the great flood is not unique to Judaism or Christianity. That story has been used throughout multiple spiritual traditions to symbolize the washing away of the old and the ushering in of the new.

The gospels attributed to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were written 40 to 70 years after Yeshua by anonymous communities, not by the disciples themselves. This is standard teaching in seminaries.

The names were added in the second century by church tradition, which is often done in religions to manufacture scriptural authority. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John did not write Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Reading a book rich with symbology, mythology, and parable as literal fact is to miss the mark. And that book, those teachings of Yeshua, are about you.

Hamartia (ἁμαρτία) is a Greek archery term that translates to missing the mark, which has been translated into the English word sin. Think about that.

To combine the Tanakh (Old Testament) and what has become called the New Testament in the same book is also to miss the mark.

The Tanakh speaks of the Judeo Father God who gets angry, becomes wrathful and vengeful, who teaches an eye for an eye.

The teachings of Yeshua were much more radical for the time. He taught to love one's neighbor as oneself, to help the needy, the concept of agape love, and that an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.

These teachings are much more in alignment with the Buddha, who lived 500 years before the birth of Yeshua.

These two books do not come from the same religion. When Yeshua referenced the Tanakh, he did so as any Jewish teacher would, citing scripture while teaching his radically different message of self-realization and enlightenment.

Yeshua himself never wrote anything. He wasn't a Christian. He knew nothing of the religion that would be created in his name in the years and decades after his death.

He was a Jewish mystic teaching direct experience of the divine, showing others they too could realize their unity with God.

Yeshua explicitly taught this.

Luke 17:20-21: The kingdom of God does not come with observation, nor will they say see here or see there. For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you.

John 14:12: Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these.

Psalm 82:6, which Yeshua quotes in John 10:34: I said, you are gods. You are all sons of the Most High.

1 Corinthians 3:16: Don't you know that you yourselves are God's temple and that God's Spirit dwells in your midst?

But the religion created later flipped his message. Yes, he taught you how to awaken. Yes, he said the kingdom is within you and you're capable of what he did, and greater.

But the institution said forget all that. You're a sinner. He's special. You're not. Just believe in him, accept the sacrifice, and he'll handle everything. No inner work required.

You are God's beautiful creation... tainted at birth by original sin. You'll never be what Yeshua taught that you already are, but do your best. Show up. Tithe. Let the institution mediate your relationship with God.

Yeshua spoke Aramaic, not Greek. The gospels were written in Greek decades after his death by people who never met him.

Most English Bibles translate from those Greek texts, which means the words attributed to Yeshua have already passed through one language barrier.

The Peshitta preserves an Aramaic tradition closer to the language Yeshua actually spoke, but the version most English speakers read has been filtered through Greek theological concepts that didn't exist in his Jewish mystical context.

Just like the Buddha 500 years before, they turned a teacher of self-realization and enlightenment into an object of worship; declared that his attainment was beyond your grasp, and called anyone who actually followed his teaching a heretic.

Well said. Christ was a perennialist.

He sojourned in Egypt.

He traveled as far east as Ayodhya, India, formerly known as Adjudia, where there was a Nacaal Temple. There he learned the Naga language which he spoke with his dying words. Matthew and Mark guessed. He never would have asked God why God abandoned him. That thought would have been absurd given the Spinozan nature of God. God cannot abandon anything that exists.

Stories of Mary, Joseph of A, and the disciples fleeing to the UK after Christ's crucifixion suggest Joseph had contacts there, most likely related to the tin trade. Also, he would have known the Druids which means Christ likely studied with them too during some of the years not accounted for in any of the gospels.

I learned recently that the Druids were associated with serpents. Egyptians certainly revered serpents.

Naga literally means serpent.

Matthew 10:16 was about kundalini and enlightenment.

Thanks for sharing. This is not on my radar. Will look it up. 🫡🙏🫶

Yup. She nailed it.

There are a LOT of people out there, in my personal experience, who would rather attach themselves to false things because it is easier to prejudicially dismiss information that is disruptive to their worldview.

That's ok though. Not everyone knows how to love their neighbors as themselves and they will be afforded as many incarnations as they need to figure it out. We all figure it out eventually so there's no use hunting for a Chevy on a driveway with a Ford parked on it.

The good news is that we will make progress as a species and eventually the narcissists will be unmasked.

Probably abuse the fuck out of the bully pulpit to share my research with the world in an effort to kickstart the end of the era of religious dogmatism.

If you want to be a "fisher of men",

first learn how to clean and cook what you catch, otherwise, what are you even doing other than participating in a Ponzi scheme of validation?

Most people are nowhere near competent at cleaning and cooking what they've fished. It's probably less than 1% of 1% of 1% of people who are competent at this and even that may be ambitious and generous as an estimate.

There are probably more people ignorant of epistemology out there evangelizing religion in this world than there are people aware of epistemology itself which is a sad and, more than likely, accurate depiction of the state of honest communication on this planet.

Jung and Castaneda both have a place in my research library.

🤝

Jung wrote about the psychology of kundalini yoga.

Castaneda was either representing the Nagualist tradition using fiction or non-fiction. I've heard arguments in both directions.

Star Wars is fiction yet the cosmology it contains is startlingly accurate, which, given that Lucas was a protege of Joseph Campbell, makes a lot of sense.

It's like Evey Hammond's father was quoted as having said in V for Vendetta about how artists use lies to tell the truth, so even if Don Juan was fabricated entirely, based on someone, or was actually a real dude, doesn't even matter because the archetypes offer us guidance either way.

Replying to Avatar Kip Ashlynn

From what you describe that you hear, it's probably in the same family of skills as the way I hear. I think it's an ability you can develop if you're curious about the clairs.

A polarity is a simple hueristic, but it is a bit oversimplified. For example, I am a very generous person with my resources and do a lot of volunteering etc. That could be interpreted service to others, and it is. But also it makes me feel good to do, it serves me by creating healthy social networks, and I have a superstition that the more I give the more I receive. So I could also be interpreted as service to self, and it is. Most intentions are more complicated than black and white.

I have seen a lot of people get a lot of comfort from the philosophy that they chose their abuse when they were on the other side. But it's something I flatly reject. The idea of us as a separate individual is ego. Claiming we chose this is the ego's attempt to maintain a semblance of control within something they cannot control. My belief is that on the other side we are ultimately one, and the past life memories and other support for the karmic cycle are real but misunderstood. That's why so many can have memories of a past life of being Cleopatra or whatever other glamorous celebrity. I think we all can access memories of anyone, because ultimately we are all one.

The suicide question is also different in my interpretation. I think that while we have free will, it's constrained within a system of fate. Time as we understand it isn't the full picture, I think reality is like an object and our perception of time is us as an ant crawling along the outside of that object. The ant experiences each moment of time as they walk the perimeter, but the object exists as a whole independent of the ant's experience of the object being slowly revealed to it. I think on some level past, present, and future are simultaneously existing and there is no time. This explains why people can remote view any when as well as any where.

So within a fated experience, an individual might learn life can be unbearable. If there was an understanding choice about life beforehand, then they would have also been aware of the whole possibilities including death. I think if the suicide was not within the fated life contract, then it wouldn't be successful. If it was, then it was meant to be.

I think these things can be really interesting to think about, but runs the risk of becoming a distraction. It seems to me if we focus better on each moment and choosing love and light, then we'll be doing our part to lower the entropy of the overall system. And we would avoid slippery slopes within our logic about the consequences of our actions within our current lives that I've seen lead to an acceptance of evil and victim blaming.

Yeah, that's why the Yin has a dot of Yang in it and vice versa. When I'm talking about shifting in one direction or another along the polarity spectrum, the shift is often consistent of 2 components which, to varying degrees dependent upon particulars, offset one another. For the sake of discussion, here's a totally arbitrary example: if you go plus 5 but minus 2, all we see is a net shift of +3. on your karma/polarity.

Also it is important to account for the thresholds. 50+% service to others is the threshold for positive harvest and 95+% service to self is the threshold for negative harvest. Some amount of service to self is expected...baked in...necessary. Frankly, someone who is so badass that they only need to serve themselves 1% of the time and can spend 99% of their time serving others is clearly "more Divine" than someone who is at 50.1% service to others and 49.9% service to self. This speaks to capabilities which are virtues as forms of power.

As I told nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmny9uqzp9kgwajajq93d86lmk9urxle00vvd5trlaqk4zw5tjahetzge9pnz0pukc recently, talking with other mystics is weird. We live on Earth as individual human beings and that's baked into the linguistic operating systems we use. To deny that isn't going to get anyone very far in the world. Try walking into a bank and telling them that Warren Buffett is really you because we're all one and security will be escorting you out of the bank in short order. So, we live with one foot in the real world and one foot in a based cosmology of unity. It's a really hard conversation to have so I usually don't bother with discussion of that apparent contradiction unless the other person is brand new to the concept and has never considered it before.

I don't know what your precise definition of fate is but I don't believe in fate as my definition of fate is directly contradictory to free will and without free will creation does not occur. Creation was not a one time event. It is an ongoing process. What people perceive as "fate" is coincidence, chance, karma, entropy, physics, etc. You are a creator as am I. We participate in the ongoing process of creation and in order to do so we exercise our will. Again, if you want to zoom out to the perspective of the One Infinite Creator, we can talk about how free will is a distortion but that's not really applicable to us living this life here now. Fate, as a concept, is a great way to rugpull motivation leading to a descent into general apathy, depression, and nihilism. Fate is a reductive boil down of a very complex equation and I don't like ignoring the nuance offered by the equation when attempting to establish causality.

We do agree on time being a sort of construct and that all time exists all of the time in the same way that a movie reel's frames all exist all the time but by displaying them in a certain order you get the illusion of time based action. This negates free will about as much as selecting a multiple choice response on a test negates free will. You're selecting from a pool of options, it's just that the pool is basically infinite instead of a, b, c, & d.

I think we're all evolving closer to Divinity so if someone can't deal with a life's struggles they need to become better and overcome in whatever ways they can. The Divine is all Wise, all Understanding, all Powerful, all Merciful, all Victorious, and all Glorious. Giving up because a mortal life was hard to bear is not wise, understanding, powerful, victorious, or glorious. It's merciful for about 2 seconds until the soul gets to the other side at which point it realizes what a huge mistake it has made.

Consider that, if you wanted to learn certain lessons in a particular incarnation but then you peace out, when you get back to the other side, you're still gonna want to learn those same lessons. Maybe you take a little time off between lives...maybe you save those lessons for 5 lives from now, but eventually you're going to put yourself into situations just like the one that you exited. Suicide is like punching yourself in the face. It does absolutely no good.

Dolores Cannon begs your attention. The concept of "imprints" is something that "residents" of higher densities can access to experience an incarnation that was originally lived by another soul. It's kind of like Blockbuster but for life experiences. You check out a movie. Bring it back, check out another one, etc. Sometimes these entities choose to actually incarnate in 3rd density but I could imagine that a wanderer/starseed would choose to live a few imprints on a particular planet as a particular self-aware species before actually incarnating.

In my post about siddhis/clairs, please note that I used lots of wiggle room words very intentionally, e.g. "I think...", "...could potentially...", and multiple instances of "...perhaps...". I'm usually pretty good about qualifying speculations as speculations.

I also have severe difficulty parsing noise streams. Cross talk blends together. Misophonia can be bad especially with repetitive noises, especially when they're unnecessary.

I don't mean to suggest that anything traumatic or abusive was deserved.

I also don't mean to suggest when I use the word karma that I'm attached to the Hindu caste system or anything like that. Karma is a useful term for shifts in polarity between service to others or service to self. Moving along that axis in any direction is a karmic thing.

I haven't gone through what you have (as far as I know) but let's just say that I have the stars (astrological birth chart) to back me up when I say I've been through a childhood gauntlet of sorts as well.

As an adult, I've been homeless before. Eaten expired free food. Worked multiple jobs though. It was just that I graduated right into the financial crisis that gave rise to Bitcoin and nobody was hiring. Didn't matter if I was smart. They were all in damage control.

That said, here is what my research has yielded.

Kids mad at their parents may say something like "I didn't choose to be born to you." Basically, that's not exactly true. Both Dr. Ian Stevenson MD's research and Dolores Cannon's research suggest that we have a say in where we incarnate. We choose the conditions into which we will be born because we think those conditions offer us catalyst we need to polarize in the way we wish to continue to polarize.

So, from that perspective, I chose to have a very difficult childhood by choosing to be born then, there, to those people.

Now here's the flip side.

I wouldn't trade any of the suffering I've endured between now and my birth because without it...the butterfly effect...would I even be the me that I am today without it? Conceivably, no, which means I wouldn't feel like I understand things I never thought I would.

From what I've seen, we almost preprogram our subconscious mind to offer us experiences that are helpful for the ways that we want to develop so to a certain extent, the challenges we fight are self imposed pre-incarnation.

Here is one way I think about karma. If someone commits suicide, they likely still had unfinished goals for this life that were established pre-incarnation. If that's the case, as soon as they get back to the other side, they're gonna be like "Damn! Why did I do that? Now I have to go start all over as a baby, forget EVERYthing, and work through the same lessons I didn't complete because I hit the exit button." Our own desire to develop is its own form of karma between lives and it 100% includes our free will.

I wouldn't be surprised if some of the things you endured as a child were the origin of any of your clairs. My awakening was one of the most stressful moments of my life but all I could do was surrender.

Births are often traumatic. It would make sense for "death" (da'ath in Kabbalah, Gnosis, Vishuddha, etc.) and rebirth (born again, Phoenix rising from its own ashes, etc.) to, as above so below, be traumatic.

Literally the first thing I did after my awakening was scream at the sky/universe/God.

I didn't understand that what I had just experienced was a result of my surrender. I thought I had just surrendered and then I was "being told to do something" but I didn't know what to do, given that I had just surrendered so I screamed "WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM ME?!?!?!?"

In hind sight, as a positively polarized soul, the words "what do you want from me" if stripped of emotion, is exactly what a "service to others oriented" person would say.

nostr:nprofile1qqst5teefqektpr4aytgpwyclxlq78v9q9nvd2pem0sgf5pxdttwyzspramhxue69uhkvmmwwd68ytt5v4ehgtn0deex2mnyv4ezucm0d5hszymhwden5te0wp6hyurvv4cxzeewv4ej7w005hr You called it. A week later and boom! 💥

Another theta wave application and look at what was done to this facility…

My thought is that Bitcoiners will spearhead Quantum Computing development because we want to use it to secure the network before someone else develops it and uses it to attack the network.

I figure the humpback whales had better be getting a move on that sooner rather than later.

We need a Keiser QC, WinkleviQC, MayerQC, etc.