From an outcomes perspective, they have to choose Bitcoin, or to end up with a loose loose scenario; however, even choosing bitcoin will ultimately reduce their ability to manipulate capital markets. He may not be on the side of “good”. But from their perspective, he’s right.
Sell it on Nostr peer to peer using zaps.
It could be a global trade platform: Zaps are the trees. Imagine the Forrest. Now, if we could only trust each other, peer to peer.
Makes you wonder about Elon? He hurt Bitcoin at Tesla and then confused people with Doge. And what he’s doing at Twitter isn’t exactly free speech.
And self custody. To avoid exchanges, ETFs and futures to trade Bitcoin they don’t have and this dilute the value.
And scarcity is what makes it so it can’t be debased. Humans have been longing for scarcity forever, that’s why they picked gold. Then they said gold is not transportable enough, let’s use coupons. Coupons backed by gold. Etc. normies are confused by the backing aspect and the related intrinsic value concept. 
It was related to the gold comment. Re Ordinals, it’s just a distraction. Nostr+Lightning+Bitcoin will change the world. Ordinals? Not so much.
I had the same issue with strike. Now using wallet of Satoshi. Easy as pie.
🎵
What is the payment for? What is the value add/functionality?
It’s another syntheword. No actually really know what that means.
And sticking with your community (follows and topics) instead of the global tap.
Money money money. I want the freedom to chose how I react.
It is, of course a lot more profound, a peer to peer market place. Maybe start by buying your vegetables on a farmers’ market using ZAPs, then restaurants, then global trade. It’s all ready to go.
Boing for example is a company that wouldn’t exist anymore. Over the years trillions of printed money have gone into subsidizing and rescuing it. Competition and innovation thwarted. In a free market, people would have out their capital on the highest probability ROI enterprise, because the rescue piece of printed money would not be there and the risk equation would have looked different. Boeing is 1950s technology snd has ethics issues. Who knows, if perfect capital allocation using a BTC standard would have been in place all along, we would already have quiet, clean, individual drones or something and a better world.