This logo says a block is never late nor early. It arrives precisely when it means to.

Thanks for the response Guy, this helps a lot.

I'll take a look at the Citrea project to understand more on that side. I start from the POV that everyone has good intentions. Up until I understand they don't. I defintely don't like the idea of making changes for a single project.

As to impact, in this case, the fuck around and find out approach may not be best. I tend towards wanting to understand a definite "in case of emergency, break glass" approach. THis infrastructure is too critical to try something only to end up going "oops". And considering how the taproot ended in an oops, I would hope we might learn from that. The other thing that gives me the heebie jeebies is removal of a node operator's ability to choose. I don't care if a dev feels it is not doing much. Then they can choose not to use it. There is no reason to take away my choice on that.

Do we have a technical solution, good. Should we apply the solution? There be dragons.

Again appreciate it. I needed this simplified context.

I am an admittedly non-technical node runner who is technical-curious. Can someone help me understand what will happen if we don't make this change? What impact will doing nothing have on Bitcoin as a monetary network? I see all the back and forth, and I follow it. But when I try to mentally distill it down, I get to, "Well, someone is already doing the unintended thing, so we should make it easier to do the unintended thing over here that "may" be an improvement, or "may" just give them a way to do the unintended thing in a new way. Does doing this solve a serious problem for bitcoin as a distributed ledger and monetary network? I may be missing something (please advise) but this sounds like a philosophical and non technical discussion.

Appreciate it. I run a node so that is one of my concerns. But that just makes the argument seem more odd.

I am trying to bring this discussion down to kind of the simplest points for my simple brain, please check my math. Effectively the argument is remove the op_return limts and even remove the ability for node runners to turn them back on because people are finding ways to add not tx critical data to transactions anyway. Is that it at it's root? By definition, the data that is being added is non-critical to monetary transactions on a network designed to be a monetary network. Do I have this right?

Who would have thought our final boss would be a tik toker with a manicure. That is what we are up against.

Jesus wept. This is what our "leaders" look like now.

Yeah, but did you get yours with one of those cool Madex boxes?

Hell yeah, congrats man!

Guys, it's not about the lambo. it's about the dips we stacked along the way.

Too soon?

This dude is awesome. Started in more of the survival vein, but his hobo stuff is so cool. Really solid tips.

Has anyone seen the casting calls for these guys? Do they explicitly list "must look like Bond Villain"?

Question for the class: Why would ai not have the option to zap posts in any client, even though I have successfully connected a wallet. I can zap an individual via their profile, but not a post.

I’m sorry. We are talking some really bad ninjas of their swords are being banned.

Good for you! Wrestled in high school myself. Hell of a sport. You really test yourself. Glad you get to leave those shoes on the mat.

Collegiate wrestling?

I thought so. Just picked up their Isle Royale for camping and canoe tripping. Totally old world quality.

Love that bag. Who makes it?

That is a dead sexy knife. Handle has a nice shape to it.

Sleepy, you were right. I made it less than a day. Got real un funny real fast.

Lol, buddy he ain't a gateway to shit. He makes me laugh.

If someone asks me to prove you can't be censored on nostr, I can bring up Verita and go "Look at this dumbass spouting bullshit. He's still here "