Why am I not surprised shitcoiners are in Luke's camp
Wow I'm not talking about lightning... I'm talking about transactions on main net.
Keep simping though.
In your opinion... That's the point. Spam, cash, VALUE is subjective. Satoshi already solved the spam problem with proof of work.
Also, I would agree, lightning Bitcoin is mostly used as cash.
Can you read? I'm highly critical of lightning... I've said I agreed with what you're saying. Then I asked you questions and you haven't clarified or answered any of them. Looks like the pot calling the kettle black to me... What are we even debating? You haven't made a claim I disagree other than censoring certain transactions, and I asked you if channel opens should be censored to clarify YOUR position. My position is clear. Don't censor any transactions.
The only miners I simp for are the ASICs sitting in my shed that keep me paid with No KYC sats while keeping my family warm in the winter ๐ฅฐ
Was this the response you expected from me? Because definitely not. I've been extremely critical of Ocean for instance...
The reason they have to be empty is that they can't process SegWit transactions
https://themerkle.com/is-asicboost-still-a-problem-with-segwit-activating-on-the-network/
Ty for more info. Always appreciated.
There will ALWAYS be 2-3 large mining pools. That is the nature of an ultra competitive market.
Yes, truly great marketing
#m=image%2Fwebp&dim=1080x834&blurhash=%23CAS%2BK%7D5%5Dv-Hkq9qS%7EInnpv%3AwGW8xdWBWTW%3DofjJ0%5DBqF6M%5Dn%25%253nOogWl5fESSlEIs%3Aw%7Et6j%5DkQR%25%24*rso%7CWBjZR*ofWB%25MWBodafofRkoeWBf8VtRjX4jIj%40WVofayof&x=4694f4703b882f50535083be7f389f48235396810afb3f99fb15df63ff3382b1No... This just happens from time to time when the chain accepts an empty template when blocks are solved very close together and the new template isn't filed in yet. Nothing to do with the pool. This can happen with anyone.
Again... I don't disagree with you here. But it does scale Bitcoin... Just not in the way that we as Bitcoiners would like it to.
Seems like you're avoiding my questions though...
None of what you said is incorrect. So you're saying we should censor channel opens because they're spam by your definition. I just want to make sure I have this clear.
By your definition, Bitcoin will never scale because any attempt at an L2 isn't "cash" and should be censored?
ooof ngmi ...
"real Bitcoin", "Stack of Benjamin's is my favorite"
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=757x1234&blurhash=%5E7H1lG-BvzrH0wNK00OrRibr%5B%5DtR%5EH%2Ct5Rk%3BkYRO8xP9%5E%2B%23XGDrsAHs%3BNtJ6%3D1J7.k%2C%3F%237j%3BNGNb%5EjEe9un7xp-VRONK%252k%3BI%5EV%3F8_%3D%7C-%3AWAxvEL&x=37528740ee605ed75f76f793814138e98fe89f151f3bb2718d3b184c7d2ffa3a
Maybe don't let Ocean mining gas light you into thinking they're "decentralizing mining" a day after they have some competition from another new pool that aims to make Bitcoin mining better than anything they're doing. Full node requirement to mine on a pool is an actual way to decentralize Bitcoin more with each miner actually having a say in template.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/braidpool-a-second-competitor-in-decentralizing-mining
But... Miners can decide what pool they mine with. So WTF is your point here? Or is there not one and you just want to virtue signal to Bitcoiners?
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1080x1079&blurhash=%7CnMt8XR*%3Fbs%3A-%3Bof%25fofxu%3FbjsRjazRjayV%40j%5BWB_NoKM%7BWVRQWVRjj%5BV%5BIAWVozoLofoLoffQofWXj%5BoKayj%5Bj%5Bayj%5BazD%25oft7WVt7WVofaykC-pa%7DRkjtWBj%5BWBayayozj%5BjZayayjtaya%7Cay%25MayWBbHWBfQWBj%5BWB&x=8035cb9b0857462eb51106f081db9e58768cb84a08b1bf5b4dcfd5995b932154Gotta do something to bolster that climate change narrative.
nostr:npub1jg552aulj07skd6e7y2hu0vl5g8nl5jvfw8jhn6jpjk0vjd0waksvl6n8n #BuildOnL2
First time making a flask app. Creating things from scratch for Liquid. #Python Liquid Wallet? Soon tm?
