Avatar
OceanSlim
16f1a0100d4cfffbcc4230e8e0e4290cc5849c1adc64d6653fda07c031b1074b
Pro Gun. Anti War. Truss Designer by trade. Self Taught Software Developer. Hardware enthusiest. Node runner. Live your life in service to others. #nostr only since Block 775261. Father of 2. Developing a nostr relay: https://github.com/0ceanslim/grain Contact: https://happytavern.co/contact

Anyone firmiliar with setting up SSL cert for an umbrel server? #asknostr

I was able to just search by noteid on primal. Perhaps the note doesn't exist on the relays in your list.

Which app? Fun fact, you can download hundreds of apps (clients) and use your same nostr account in all sorts of ways! It's what makes nostr a million times better than any other basic app. A lightning address is a way for people to send you sats (Bitcoin) for things you post!

So anyways, what client (app) are you using?

Welcome. Delete that toxic hell hole from your life. Get a lightning address and I'll zap you!

The way *GO* handles packages is the way.

I enjoy smartless for a laugh from time to time.

"I would never join a platform like Nostr if there's no way notes can be deleted"

"Why is that?"

"Depending what kind of platform it wants to be, if you have content creators like on tiktok or Instagram and someone disagrees with what they say, on these platforms people go as far as finding out addresses and phone numbers and post them in the comments. Mods remove such things. If notes can't be deleted, such information stands there forever. It's dangerous and a no go"

Had a talk this morning following yesterday's discussions about safety on Nostr. This reply is hard to argue with. If you're a nym it doesn't concern you much. If you create "social media content" like videos or images and people even know or recognize you, they might do the worst things for the worst reasons and there currently is no way to prevent or stop that.

Thinking about this a lot today. It's a fine line between censorship resistance and people feeling safe to use the protocol in a way they see fit.

If we want to always have a couple of Bitcoin anons, ignore what I said. If we want mass adoption it's a topic we need to address.

Can it be addressed tho? Yes, but we would need to shift from absolute censorship resistance to something compromised. Maybe some community based reporting mechanism that relays comply with in terms of deleting said notes. We would still not have a central instance but the community guiding such things.

Should it be done? Up for discussion. Especially now that we have a main focus on the outbox model and blastr, it would make it way harder to implement something like that as notes get spread out on many relays that all would need to comply to some mechanism like that. Almost impossible if it's not a standard part of the protocol.

I know this is not a popular topic. I'm interested what people think about it tho.

If you are concerned with safety online, then you shouldn't post content publicly. Deletion is much much more important to me for curating content than it is for moderating and censoring speech you don't like. No one should be able to delete someone else's notes for any reason. (I mean broadly speaking, relay operators absolutely have a say in what they have on their own relay, just not what's on the protocol at large)

"I would never join a platform like Nostr if there's no way notes can be deleted"

"Why is that?"

"Depending what kind of platform it wants to be, if you have content creators like on tiktok or Instagram and someone disagrees with what they say, on these platforms people go as far as finding out addresses and phone numbers and post them in the comments. Mods remove such things. If notes can't be deleted, such information stands there forever. It's dangerous and a no go"

Had a talk this morning following yesterday's discussions about safety on Nostr. This reply is hard to argue with. If you're a nym it doesn't concern you much. If you create "social media content" like videos or images and people even know or recognize you, they might do the worst things for the worst reasons and there currently is no way to prevent or stop that.

Thinking about this a lot today. It's a fine line between censorship resistance and people feeling safe to use the protocol in a way they see fit.

If we want to always have a couple of Bitcoin anons, ignore what I said. If we want mass adoption it's a topic we need to address.

Can it be addressed tho? Yes, but we would need to shift from absolute censorship resistance to something compromised. Maybe some community based reporting mechanism that relays comply with in terms of deleting said notes. We would still not have a central instance but the community guiding such things.

Should it be done? Up for discussion. Especially now that we have a main focus on the outbox model and blastr, it would make it way harder to implement something like that as notes get spread out on many relays that all would need to comply to some mechanism like that. Almost impossible if it's not a standard part of the protocol.

I know this is not a popular topic. I'm interested what people think about it tho.

NIP-09: AM I A JOKE TO YOU.

It's all vaporware. Ask what problem it solves. If you can't answer that, it's not a solution to any problem. ie vaporware.

When the fuck did 9-5 become 7-5? Fiat bullshit.

I've opted for 21 sat zaps as my lowest setting. 1 sat isn't worth the routing fees.

It took me longer than I care to admit to figure out that npubs and hex keys for nostr use bech32 #dev #nostr

Sure, but not necessarily. Doing things multiple ways instead of one way does make a dk a bit harder to use because I have to go look at the repo to see which way when using it. I'm not saying I know anything. I'm stupid. So if there's a reason for the way it is, enlighten me and I'll be less stupid. You guys are the smart ones here.