Avatar
Gunnar Stødle
198ae429b4fdfb7ad0d05c6877c3b2c7db5aedfff9794682fc52fd50e8cee27a
Mountain Man, Maker myrabbitholestory.com

Haha i see my comment can be misread. I understand Walkers sarcasm, but marvel at people gobbling up YouTube warnings as gospel. We are not hypothesizeing, its happening, its in your face.

Lol "hypothesize a secretly emerging totalitarian world government" they are building and promoting their NWO for all to see. They write books about it, thousands of policy documents, gather at large publicly brodcasted conferences they are shoving their shit down your normie throat and you still don't see.

Replying to Avatar Cowboy Bill

Eliminate the metaphors, state-comparisons, and narrative drift

Bitcoin is not network, currency, or metaphor.

Bitcoin = Entropy + Voluntary Consensus → Irreversible Law.

Entropy: Energy is consumed irreversibly.

Every joule sacrificed becomes proof-of-work.

Proof anchors history in thermodynamic law.

Consensus: Nodes define validity.

Miners extend history, but cannot alter rules.

Attack requires not only infinite energy, but coercion of sovereign nodes.

Union: Energy without consensus is brute force.

Consensus without energy is empty decree.

Together, they instantiate incorruptible law.

Bitcoin does not secure privacy (requires sovereign tools).

Bitcoin does not guarantee freedom (requires sovereign action).

Bitcoin secures exactly one thing:

The incorruptible integrity of voluntary exchange, recorded in irreversible time.

Armies project coercion through violence.

Banks project decree through fiat.

Bitcoin projects law through proof-of-sacrifice.

Armies and banks dissolve into irrelevance,

because decree and violence cannot override entropy bound to consensus.

Attack is not “tearing down walls.”

Attack requires reversing entropy and subverting voluntary nodes.

Both together are categorically impossible within natural and sovereign law.

The firewall is not electricity.

The firewall is not hashrate.

The firewall is refusal.

Nodes refusing corrupted rules.

Sovereigns refusing coercion.

Bitcoin = Irreversible sacrifice of energy bound to voluntary consensus.

Ledger = Memory of incorruptible sovereignty.

Block = Proof-of-sacrifice embedded in time.

Node = Sovereign enforcement of incorruptible law.

If energy collapses, nodes hold.

If nodes collapse, sovereigns fork.

If both collapse, signal resurrects elsewhere.

Bitcoin cannot be simulated, captured, or reversed.

It is incorruptible law instantiated in entropy and will.

nostr:note120v6jn2wmavsnuge32x9k9dq55jgl45rc85vzd946d4pwydlqquspq37en

Can't wait to bring this to market 😎 #knifestr

I said OK because I accept your opinion. However I do not agree as in the end I only answer to my self. I am born free and will die free. We can disagree its OK.

1869 I am a free-born sovereign, sir, an American.‘M. Twain’, Innocents Abroad xi. 100Citation details for ‘M. Twain’, Innocents Abroad

https://www.oed.com/dictionary/sovereign_n?tl=true

How can you not be exsteamly Bullish Nostr and Bitcoin with all the great people building and adoption this awesome tech stack?

nostr:nevent1qqs0w2a8pwuks82y4kuh9fsgnrny0vtsphyylhsf675ahvrq6lr90kcpramhxue69uhkummnw3ezuetfde6kuer6wasku7nfvuh8xurpvdjsygz5vzgys2zd9g23er0kyh6qcwyaggldq4lua7f8mwyf2mfgug46qvpsgqqqqqqsqmfyxd

Had a simular experience with proton years ago. Accessed my account from different VPNs and tor nodes. Got permanently banned from my email account. This in turn locked me out of everything I used the email for so it created quite a lot of hassle. I been warning people about Proton ever since. Sad to see a lot of bitcoiners still trust them. Hope you at least get access again so you can move on.

Bitcoin gigabrain economists claim that bitcoin have to go through a broad Store of Value fase to become a Medium of Exchange. If this is true and the SoV fase is compromised by trusted third parties it will never be broadly adopted as a MoE. We can mitigate this risk by using bitcoin as a MoE today and prove them wrong.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

There are those who say Bitcoin doesn't scale, and build blockchains with more throughput at the cost of more centralization (generally in the form of it being way harder to run a node), and then also point to Bitcoin as having low fees as a criticism.

The limiter it turns out, 16 years in, is not how many people *can* self-custody bitcoin. It's how many people *want* to.

Not everyone wants to deal with the technicalities of their own car, and not everyone wants to handle the technicalities of their own money. Quite few, in fact. It's always a subset for these types of things. People who are hardcore over their area of knowledge.

I leave my car details to pros down the street who I know the name of, and handle my money myself. There are those who handle their own cars but leave their money details to others.

Bitcoin currently processes about as many transactions per year as Fedwire, which handles $1 quadrillion worth of gross settlement volume per year for the US and for a good chunk of the world (in context, it's approximately 200 million $5 million average-sized transactions). That's actually a crazy stat. Bitcoin is casually this open-source global Fedwire with its own scarce units, and unlike Fedwire anyone can permissionlessly build on it or transact with it, for low fees despite it being a +$2T network. And if it gets clogged there are all sorts of permissionless layers above it with certain trade-offs.

Some people say paper bitcoin holders detract from the network. I say the opposite- their willingness to hold IOUs helps add to price stability and network size without clogging it. That leaves more room for cypherpunks to develop with, and work on. And those who finance them.

This has been foreseen as early as Hal Finney in 2010, when he wrote about bitcoin banks (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2500.msg34211#msg34211).

We live in a sweet spot by most metrics. A golden age. Historically, so few recognize it when they have it so good.

Bitcoin is big enough to be of interest to many, and yet is still niche enough in a global context to have low base-layer fees. Suitcoiners are happy to add to its scale, and yet cypherpunks can also build, and users can transact right on the base layer, and move to Lightning and Ark and BitVM and Liquid and any sort of trade-off they want if fees get high.

And you're bearish, anon?

The real battle, though, is the ongoing government crackdown on privacy.

Bitcoin itself is in a pretty good technical place. It's a great tool. Certain conservative low-risk covenants might make it better, but even the existing design space is great and still expanding.

The US, Europe, and China cracking down on privacy is the threat. The headwind. And they're all expected. They're not surprising, but they're indeed fierce. That's the real battle- for the hearts and minds of people to embrace why privacy and permissionlessness are good traits.

In this ongoing funny contrast between podcasters and developers, that's the ideal role of podcasters- to spread the good news of what developers have built. To educate people. To tell them what's now possible thanks to developers. To articulate why cypherpunk values are good to a broad non-technical audience. That's where the overlap is. In overly-simplistic D&D terms, those with high CHA try to spread the work of those with high INT. It's not so much that "governments" are the problem. Governments often at least partially represent the people. If you convince a lot of people that privacy and sound money are good things, then you defang the problem. And you also challenge them legally in jurisdictions where it makes sense.

The technical foundation is good. The development of the past 16 years has been amazing, and it has brought us here. The scale has reached institutions, which is expected, not a threat. The actual threat is not treasury companies; it's anti-privacy regulations by governments. And more deeply that's a social issue, given how many people accept it. A vast amount of people believe privacy is only important for bad people who have something to hide. There's a ton of education work to do on it. Privacy is good. It's the default. But most people don't realize it when it comes to money.

We're winning. For 16 years ya'll have been amazing. But we'll need another 16 years more. More developers. More podcasters. All of it. We're a $2 trillion in market cap entering into a global fiat network of hundreds of trillions. And as their own institutions melt down from their own failures, their own top-heavy demographics and false promises, they will look for scapegoats. They will look toward those who are winning, and say they are the enemy.

When interviewers ask my price predictions, I tend to be conservative. That's mostly a liquidity assessment, and a rotation from OGs to new buyers. Price growth does take time.

But under that surface, I also have the benefit of being a general partner at among the largest bitcoin-only venture funds. I see what people are building, and I'm bullish. And for those who are working on stuff that doesn't align with profit, entities like the HRF and OpenSats are doing great work. Across all of the options, people are building great things.

I couldn't be more bullish on the ecosystem that's in place. All of you.

Let's go.

Good evening.

Paper bitcoiners sacrifice the 21 million hard cap, censorship resistance and price discovery on the alters of adoption. I will never endorse fractional reserve bitcoin. Onboarding people with IOUs reintroduce trusted third parties, weakens censorship resistance, feed the fiat beast, divert demand and suppress the price. I rather promote second layer bitcoin solutions and the bitcoin circular economy. Bitcoin a peer-to-peer electronic cash system for the win

Love reading random pleb stories from my nostr:nprofile1qqsrgrj2a7rv65jq4t6lc4g0506zj8n2qv5p535mdme57ps0d9zqx0cpzemhxue69uhky6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skcqghwaehxw309a38gcedd96xzmrfvyhx7mnvd9hx2teusqr collection

Nhaa I had a 70 year old Norwegian electrical stove in the old place I rented. No cannot convince me a new electrical stove last that long based on survivorship bias alone. There is something called inflation, and planned obsolescence rejecting you claim.

Yes Bitcoin's incentieves wil take care of everything. Its a beautyful autonomous truth machine. Or as Ralph Merkle said:

Bitcoin is the first example of a new form of life.

It lives and breathes on the internet. It lives because it can pay people to keep it alive. It lives because it performs a useful service that people will pay it to perform. It lives because anyone, anywhere, can run a copy of its code. It lives because all the running copies are constantly talking to each other. It lives because if any one copy is corrupted it is discarded, quickly and without any fuss or muss. It lives because it is radically transparent: anyone can see its code and see exactly what it does.

Testing out wooden scale overlays. Came out OK, may be a little pale and to much contrast to the black G10? Think I gone try a pair with darker wood or some stain.

Cyberita.no #custom #knifestr