Switch the paradigm. By phones for the OS you want to run. I never got caught up in getting a phone for it's hardware other that smaller size, but I suppose some people want fancy cameras.
I'm being told iPhone can, too. As far as I know, they can't by default, but if they can, why is App Store banning an app even an issue at all? People are familiar with browsing to a site, downloading something, and installing it.
What do you mean? Google Pixels are the most easily degoogleable.
You don't have to sideload anything. Go to website. Download app. Install. People are used to doing this with their laptop/desktop and Android let's you do it too. iPhone does not.
Why? If a user wants it to be easy they will just install Twitter.
Apple doesn't let you do what you want. By choosing to use it, one chooses to give up the control over their experience. Linux (android) is the revolution. Join us.
Android is NOT the Google Play Store. Android, by default, let's you do what you want. That's the whole point.
Quit air frying steaks.
I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream
New A2P-10DLC rules at Twilio are making it tough for simply using their service for personal comms. Any good alternatives?
It might be a little different. With FPS chat there is still latency, but it doesn't mater because each player's perspective is relative to their own first person view. For esports, the broadcast of the player view and commentary are coming from the same location. I think the difficulty arises when the media is broadcast from one location, commentary sent from another, and viewer receiving both separately.
There are things like that which have been tried, but yet they are not popular. I'm arguing that syncing cheers would be a ux requirement. Nobody wants to have the name revealed to them by a desynced cheer.
I would have thought it would be 90% engineering. Latency is the problem which causes the horrible UX for time-sensitive entertainment like sports. It's not just the stream from the server, syncing cheers from all parties would be tough.
The money
People letting FAANG spy on children should be shamed: https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/amazon-to-pay-30m-over-ring-and-alexa-data-privacy-violations/
It doesn't matter if it's against the law, they will do it anyway. The profit outweighs the punishment.
People letting FAANG spy on children should be shamed: https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/amazon-to-pay-30m-over-ring-and-alexa-data-privacy-violations/
I'm really surprised nostr:npub1jg552aulj07skd6e7y2hu0vl5g8nl5jvfw8jhn6jpjk0vjd0waksvl6n8n doesn't have a nip-05 id at their own domain. It had to verify they were real using the dead bird.
Does it suggest it's libertarian owned?
The client would have to utilize a standard API with configurable credentials. The creds part should be easy. Priv key is on device and could sign its request. Server just needs to verify before accepting upload.
I kind of wish there was a way for clients to utilize personal storage. Like, if I could point it to my own filerserve. I don't know what the simplest solution for that would be.
How many people still wearing masks are really just worried about facial recognition?
Data is dirty. Cash is clean.
War on cash. "Public" parks already don't accept it.
Doom sells. It's a relief to get away from it.
A nostr client which allows you to configure your own media storage might be nice. Are there any like that? sftp is usually not the way, but this might be a use case.