Avatar
bennibtc
2ecb03f03e681d8afb86a88f554bd51f823dd5cd43575e9bd36e2114f6f2b314
on social media break

probably not with all of them, but imo there is a likelyhood of shady stuff going on with these companies.

like the blood not actually getting to the cause, but being used for bioweapon research instead.

also: any health experts opinions on letting blood in here?

decentralized social "credit" scoring is actually amazing for freedom. and it's inevitable.

relay management is going to get easier,

and as people are already willing to pay 8cuckbucks for bluecheck, they will happily pay that to their relay management service provider instead...

I certainly would...

and they won' t even notice anything of what's happening in the background

Missionaries/ salespeople got a bad rep through being twisted by fiat,

but if done in a healthy way it is just basic human nature to strenghten your network and make new friends.

You can be f*cking proud to be a missionary for your values.

I am pretty sure he said INquire. but still leads to the same outcome.

nostr:npub15e33vf8dx0k0ea22w4qzayc7r8xg07y7h3x7c39glxu8vf96rghs65uz8m nostr:npub19m9s8up7dqwc47ux4z842j74r7prm4wdgdt4ax7ndcs3fahjkv2qgk4hu6

I gave it a good thought. And it's extencive.

Currently with the traditional social media the platform is the gatekeeper for the #Ads. #Advertisers pay the platform to display ads and 'trust' that they display the ads to it's users with a specific profile. - Platforms ( X / Facebook / Insta / YouTube ) are in control. - User is the product.

Moneyflow goes like this:

Advertiser ----> Platform

On nostr this shifts completely because the user is in control. The user decides which relays they connect to and which client they use. There are 3 (or more) parties involved who decide which ads the user gets to see.

1) The user himself

2) The Relay the user connects to (Relays will compete with each other in the future)

3) The client the user uses to connect to the relays. (Clients will compete with each other)

4) Maybe profilebuilders (Profile builders will compete with each other in the future)

And the advertiser? They should pay all those parties in a good proportion. (Zaps & SATs)

So #nostr will enable us to be paid to see ads from advertisers.

And relays serving those ads and clients displaying those ads also should benefit from this.

This incentives Advertisers to have a good profile of the user they want to target the ad and to add value to the life of the user seeing the ad, or else the user blocks the advertiser.

There will be "advertiser profile builders" in the future competing as well and getting a part of the money the advertiser pays as well.

Money flow goes like this:

Advertiser ---> User

Advertiser ---> Relay

Advertiser ---> Client

Advertiser ---> Profile Builder

But the main part:

User is in full-control of these though the client he uses and the relays he's connecting to and the profile builder he's using. So advertisements wil be better than on traditional social media and you get paid to see them.

Just my 21 sats on this topic.

interesting:) what do you mean by "profile builders"? do you mean service providers, who sort through nostr profiles to find relevant target audience profiles for the advertiser?

Replying to Avatar HoloKat

I’m surprised by the Primal developments, and the responses on both sides. Frankly, would rather not participate in the drama at all for the sake of not keeping it going, but feels wrong to be quiet too. So.. a few thoughts…

First things first, I don’t get why ralf is blocked from trending. Or Onyx.šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļøI guess it doesn’t even matter what the reasons are, if it can be someone as decent as ralf, then it can be anyone. If it’s manual, then someone decides, not an algorithm. I think a better solution would be to have algorithms do the work, and users deciding which if any algo they wish to use.

My guess is that this is just a lot of work and perhaps Primal team has not had the time to create such powerful filtering systems yet. Maybe the decision to do it manually is a quick fix that ā€œworksā€ in their view. I could understand that. But, ultimately I think it should be up to the user.

Also, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with preventing certain npubs from trending - as long as it is done in a fair and algorithmic way, not a manual action.

I think the way Semisol has approached the entire thing has not been the most appropriate way of doing it. There’s a reason white hat hacking exists - where people are courteous and professional about their exploits. The initial exploits could have been handled better. We’re all in this together so why stir up drama?

The replies that say ā€œstart your own …. Xā€ or ā€œwrite your own clientā€ don’t seem right to me. Imagine a situation where a client becomes dominant and super popular and you yourself are blocked from trending for whatever arbitrary reason with some manual action. We have X all over again then. Exception is when you break the app’s terms for posting something illegal perhaps. Most people are not going to have the technical skills to clone Primal or any other client. They will just have to leave and use another that may be less useful to them. I guess this is a good feature of nostr in a way, but feels wrong to just tell people to use something else. I prefer we have sympathy for users and empower them instead of telling them to buzz off.

Something being public and in the repo doesn’t make it not hidden imo. Just goes back to the previous point that people don’t know how to check those things and shouldn’t really be expected to. Let’s say a new client spins up and becomes super popular, am I supposed to just check their repo daily to see if I’m added to some punitive list? Now, if the client makes some sort of an announcement saying they are implementing a filtering policy that will impact npubs that do X Y Z bad thing, then it makes sense. They are letting people know they won’t tolerate things that are against their policy and they are in their full rights to do as they please.

Anyway, that is all. I guess the TLDR; is let’s put users in control and be transparent about what we do. We don’t have to do things this way and I know many won’t care, but it’s nice to have some additional transparency unlike the shadowy nature of some of the other social networks.

nostr:note1a0wmnw5sv2ttutzzm6mtn9sjdtqeyalpcdx7fhnamtg34ktsjrwss4puml

there is a "simple" solution for all spam and sybill attacks:

numerical scoring. it's dimensions more accurate than likes or zaps.

when everyone can manually score the relevancy of posts and keys (e.g. from -10 to +10),

and we then can filter to only see posts by keys who we are scoring high ourselfes or that have similar scoring behaviour as we do.

this way scammers never have the chance to become "insiders" of high value networks, because any "insider" who would give high scores to scammers, will be downscored very fast.

this is maybe the only true decentralized moderation that can exists, because it mimicks tribal behaviour and scales it to the whole planet.

I have regularly thought trough all kinds of attack vectors for 3 years now, so let me know if you are interested in building that, I might be able to helpšŸ™

imo this is inevitable. and incredibly important for the circular economy.

but devs are mostly just devs, not familiar enough with entrepreneurship in other industries.

but that's just a matter of time AND enough entrepreneurs like us asking for it via bounties.

lmk when you find more entrepreneurs interested in that, maybe we can set up a bounty together:)

until they start migration, it stays 0. but then, yes. unless you are (shadow)banned when posting your npub on twitter.