Is this one of those Samsung fake moon pictures?
It's very far along the spectrum. It's not physical violence, but it's coercion of private property (where bodily violence is coercion of bodily private property, the ultimate kind from which all else flows)
I've got a long highlighter post coming about this reworked for the Nostr context, but this is a similar system I had designed and worked on for a different context: the urbit peer-to-peer-peer network:
https://gist.github.com/vcavallo/e008ed60968e9b5c08a9650c712f63bd
Centralized Corporate algorithms Bad.
Personal algorithms GOOD
I've got a long highlighter post coming about this reworked for the Nostr context, but this is a similar system I had designed and worked on for a different context: the urbit peer-to-peer-peer network:
https://gist.github.com/vcavallo/e008ed60968e9b5c08a9650c712f63bd
What you are describing is not about capitalism or other systems, it's way more fundamental than that. Youre describing having two conflicting need, scarce resources, and limited time: "spend a week generating resources I save for the future" vs "use saved resources while I care of a sick loved one this week" - whether the former one here is working on your own farm, building your own shack, volunteering at the community center (to "earn" social trust), doing a task for someone else, or going to a factory to get paid for hourly labor.
There's no escaping the fact that one (or a collective) must generate a surplus of energy to store if one wants to be able spend any time NOT merely generating energy 100% of their time. Either that surplus is owned by individuals and they're free to generate it and use it how they see fit, or it's owned by some collective entity. In the latter case, some system for the contribution, distribution and physical protection of the shared savings is required - and there's no way to make those systems in such a way that's fair to all and not liable to capture and prone to violence.
You're not critiquing capitalism, you're upset at the existence of the fundamental mathematics of scarce resources. I agree - it's a bummer that we don't have infinite resources. But we don't. and we have to find the best way to handle that fact in a way that doesn't result in constant conflict.
For what it's worth, technological development driven by the engine of profit-seeking capitalism - stunted though it is by State intervention - is brining about the closest thing we've ever seen to "infinite resources". Quality of life goes up while prices come down. A smartphone from 10 years ago is basically free now while it was mind-blowing when it came out. Strangers can have conversations about capitalism across the globe at light speed without censorship. A relatively "poor" kid by today's standards can start a podcast nearly for free... We should expect this to continue to the limits of physics - IF we let it and don't fuck it up with collectivism. You want your infinite resources and perfect equity? Embrace progress and private property.
Perfect example. If there was competition among licensing agencies in a truly free market, then those who operate more ethically and fairly could compete and succeed. But instead the State will imprison you or some company will attack you legally (with the backing of the State's laws you never asked for) if you try to create or merely patronize an alternate licensing agency that doesn't have state blessing.
In a free market, an individual discriminated against by one licensing agency would be free to use another or create one of his own. THAT is justice. What are you proposing that is more just than that? A different coercive, violent entity "but wait a good one"? What's the alternative you favor as more just and fair?
Lobbying and campaign donations can't exist without a State. Nobody is enslaved to a paycheck, you can choose to not work if you prefer to have no money. Just the other day a Nostr user was chiding me for not growing all my own food. You could choose the life of a subsistence farmer and not "wage slave" if you want to sacrifice all the luxuries that come with our complex economy.
"Democratically-run" is hardly desirable. That just means 51% get to coerce the other 49% while they call it "fair".
Pure voluntary consent in all things is the only world I'm interested in.
Free markets aren't the problem; States doing things like you're saying are the problem. Its not a free market. Its a State-rigged system that artificially (and violently) props up certain well-connected parties and hurts those who aren't close to the source of violence.
One mixes labor with resources to yield economic goods.
A disguised Ledger-like device where the PIN is entered by pressing a particular series of beads or links on the jewelry. You'd have to have a PIN (and a complex one) or else you're talking about embedding a bearer asset on something that can easily walk away.
I'm working on a highlighter post that recontextualizes this idea for Nostr, but here is the outline for a system I was working on for Urbit: https://gist.github.com/vcavallo/e008ed60968e9b5c08a9650c712f63bd
Exactly! A VM that exists everywhere and you are identified by a keypair. Our far-future aspirations are very much scifi/ghost in the shell - that kind of thing is really inspiring. We'll have a blog post narratively describing our ideal future world before long :)
I know what you mean about the fun of flipping data around. Even the smallest tasks are satisfying. Like you're a techno-wizard operating a bunch of tiny perfect machines.


