Why? I agree with the post because Bitcoin is money for everyone and centralised systems are more efficient.
So, allowing a centralised authority to manage the finances of the masses makes sense *if* the base currency can't be exploited.
#detox
Anyone in the UK (or US I guess) that is after high quality and good value CBD and THCV visit beleafer.com
Often have discounts, currently 20% off using code 420_2025
#mentalhealth #medicine
nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyehwumn8ghj7mnhvvh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7ctewe4xcetfd3khsvrpdsmk5vnsw96rydr3v4jrz73hvyu8xqpqsg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q8dzj6n showed me nostr recently. Reminds me of a writeup I did back in 2021 on decentralized social media:
https://rossulbricht.medium.com/decentralize-social-media-cc47dcfd4f99
I'll be mirroring my X account here and hopefully finding some good conversations.
Welcome to online freedom dude
Great idea, I heard you mentioning this on the #btctkvr podcast (nostrification ftw).
Have you set one up? If so I would be keen to give it a test run and sound out some ideas with you for a bunch of sats.
You can happily holiday in Casablanca and France though
Due process would minimise the risk. Money can and does get printed. Executive orders can and do redirect it. So it's possible.
A "shoot first and asking questions later" approach seems a tad antiquated.
Or "guilty until proven innocent".
Think about the energy required to undo the harm done to one person getting mistakenly deported. The legal battles, lawsuits etc. Suddenly due process makes more sense.
Completely agree. Wanted to zap you but you don't have a wallet yet so just liked and replied to say so.
"We've allowed" is key there. The one who allowed them in is duty bound to vet them prior to letting them in, or give due process when unallowing them. The money can be found/printed if required.
It's not acceptable to deport the wrong people accidentally, it's like fishing using a bottom trawl.
Listen to this from 50:40
Thank me later. Maybe send it to nostr:npub1cjw49ftnxene9wdxujz3tp7zspp0kf862cjud4nm3j2usag6eg2smwj2rh too
https://www.youtube.com/live/piwLGIN19Po?si=smDTlbm_u_hbax-k
I thoroughly enjoy your method of interviewing, you're calm, knowledgeable and just a little bit cheeky without being offensive.
In a couple of hours I will interview Daniel Krawisz
He is 2014’s most prolific writer, the man who came up with “hyperbitcoinization” but never gets credit for it, and a co-founder of the nostr:npub1wzc9lz2f40azl98shkjewx3pywg5e5alwqxg09ew2mdyeey0c2rqaespmf
In 2019, he decided to support the BSV fork. Will ask him why
I like the idea of a phased approach with something like ecash for tiny amounts, (like pocket change), then lightning for medium amounts (like notes or stash at home) then on chain for large sums.
Ideally automatically transferring between stages depending on amounts, maybe I'll work on that.
For discussions sake, what's wrong with Vlad's statement? Or are you just name calling to be mean?
Huge congrats to you and all the contributors.