Avatar
Han Sanders
34d51c02b06ce7dede334339cb4326f6c9f42724a65b9925b460d5d98e096151
Can you read this? Probably not, I'm invisible
Replying to Avatar doot

we’re so back btw https://x.com/kobeissiletter/status/1946321409199788481

nostr:note1kywqzxm94mkp8dlpvl3gqngrzf2g3lpe53m0e8pjywlprcfcvfasv7tfgu

What is this, I was promised Strategy's inclusion

Replying to Avatar vnprc

All of this is true. It doesn't mean that grid based solar and wind are bad.

Subsidies are examples of bad central planning at the hands of the government.

Look into volumetric pricing versus load based pricing. Load based is what you need to keep costs down in the long run. This is because load based pricing changes consumption patterns. Consumers hate it because they want a steady bill and they don't like to change their consumption patterns. Electricity billing has always been volumetric and people are resistant to change.

Volumetric pricing is an example of bad central planning at the hands of a monopoly. (A government mandated monopoly btw.) It means utilities need to match load to demand even when demand is sky high. That's really expensive in aggregate but the cost is socialized and nobody has to change consumption patterns or have inconsistent power bills, so it is the most popular choice. Tragedy of the commons.

Intermittent generation like wind and solar makes the problem worse. They get subsidized because they are popular with the public. Why does the voting public love all these terrible policies? Because the voting public is economically illiterate. They are, quite literally, a bunch of socialists.

Batteries solve the problems of pricing and intermittent generation by time shifting demand patterns. They also save a ton of money by reducing the need for transmission and distribution, the most wasteful part of our electrical grid.

Once you see the whole picture it's clear that batteries are the way forward.

Wind and solar are demand independent generators, you need a lot of adapting feedback (like load-based pricing) to integrate that succesfully into an electricity system that is demand driven, and even then it is still a source of distortion, a challenge to the reliability.

Batteries are really lacking, lagging in capacity, compared to size and price to be a viable way forward for this problem. We need leaps forward in battery tech, but only seem to be getting small steps.

Would recommend reading new ones, I've enjoyed every novel I've read from him, short stories not as much. The Gambler, The Idiot, Demons, Brothers Kamazarov are all great, all quite different IMO

I found it too hard to get into, but that was also because its so ancient and I was reading it in English, not my native language. If you find it a worthwile read, I might retry.

But then he isn't done with their Pixels yet.

Congrats, thats some of the best free marketing you can get, and as a user I can say it is well deserved for the great product you make!

This is wishful thinking, every node along your Lightning transaction's path is a toll booth or toll station if you want to keep to the analogy

I can not totally understand this, I identify as a mint user, I need violence as a possible tool to deploy on my mints owners to stop them stopping being honest.

Yes, Lightning tokens that can get rugged at any moment, so better use that BTC credit quick to pay for something OR not if you like living on the edge OR do not care and can financially recover from losing 10/20/50bucks

I subscribe to Adam Curry's theory that listening to podcasts at more than 1.0x speed makes you more easily annoyed when speaking to (random) persons IRL.

Still listening podcasts at 1.2x though. GFY IRL

Cool! Im sending nutzaps to each client dev that supports it

Replying to Avatar ecash memes

Excuse me xir, but your profile doesn't have the proper pronouns yet...