Profile: 38155b74...
Most of those types are the ones having 3 or more children these days.
I know of A LOT of White families with more than 2 children and only one with just one child.
I hope you find someone someday if you haven't already.
Whites have more Neanderthal DNA than any other race and is likely why we're at the top when it comes to important things.
It will backfire on them in the long run. Most people who make decent money but aren't multi-millionaires or billionaires or inherited multi generational wealth got it from being smart.
The guy who makes $100,000+ a year as a welder has a skill and desirable traits for women. The guy who never learns a skill or takes an risks does not usually.
You'll end up with some mongrelized retards, some good looking people (some of which are probably going to be airheads) and those smart enough to figure out a way to make decent money and combine it with their decent looks and attract women.
nostr:npub14ugy9d6t3yqvs88asezpz23qyduuy8m789zh88fnqz302dqsjj4qlu8jay
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub1est7jhq4dw4jwqf0zwy5u49gln0cur9thacuj7d4r239unc70gzs9ym7sn nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
ZOG incentivizes women to Value traits that would traditionally be undesirable. Obviously hypergamy in the modern context is very different than what it would be 100 yeas ago.
ZOG has really screwed the guys in the middle because the guys at either end either never had much of a chance (or sometimes bred like rabbits) or in the case of those born into wealth, never needed much help.
It's going to select for extremes. The guys in the middle are useful in growing the population and allowing our people to make advances in areas when they'd normally just be worried about surviving. We'll end up with a lower population number but a higher number of those with good looks, intelligence, or an acceptable combination of both which is where some of the guys in the upper echelon of "the middle" fall into.
I hope that with AI becoming more advanced we could one day use it to match ideal men up to their ideal women and avoid some of this mess.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
You mistake systems analysis for bitterness, this is flawed.
I feel like even though I don't like who you are online sometimes that we'd probably get along alright in real life and I am just trying to get you to not be a quitter but since you're taking steps to change things I guess I'm wrong about that and happy to be wrong about that.
Times aren't the best right but it pisses me off when people give up instead of fighting until their last breath. Pretty much everyone I've dealt with in these circles has some sort of redeeming qualities they could capitalize on and yet some of them don't even try. There is nothing worse than wasted potential.
Well, to be fair, those men had a skill and were very good at what they did.
Women like to see men who are good at something and take pride in their work after all.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
Survival is the #1 indicator of passing down genes, sexual selection in most species is merely a slight limiting factor.
A greater percentage of the sea turtle population is lost via death than pool sexual selection. Same for birds that mate for life.
To analogize nature to our current circumstances you would need to look at selection models based on sexual selection only, which is why I brought up the guppy study, as it strengthens the fischerian runaway hypothesis and weakens/disproves the "good genes" hypothesis. To prove your point you'd need to show that sexual selection universally increases survivability, which I don't think is possible, ergo I disagree with your prognosis that our current fischerian runaway in humans is positive or good.
You also don't account for birth control in any of your arguments, which is an atrocious blind spot, as sex access =/= childbirth.
I like the fact that so many birds mate for life but most of the species you listed, if not all, are r selected.
Sex access doesn't always equal childbirth and the pill is one of things that affected this current situation to a large degree but having no sex access definitely means no childbirth.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
To further this point:
"you're using potholes as an excuse to not go to the store. Those who don't go to the store won't have food"
"dude I'm literally buying new tires rn, but potholes suck"
This is the conversation
If you're taking steps then that is great. It just seems like you haven't changed much and are still bitter.
Life is too short to go through it being that bitter. Keep making positive changes and it will workout for you eventually. Waiting sucks but it will eventually happen.
I pointed out that the pickings are slim for most right now. It's not a good time to not be in the top 1% or whatever of men but if you give up then you have absolutely no chance.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
No, I think basic survival is the most important part as you can't even get to the sex phase if you die. No biologist would refute this point. Sexual selection can also be a detriment to natural selection. An example is fischerian runaway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway
Being great at surviving doesn't mean shit if you don't pass those traits along to the next generation.
All of these things we do are for our future, our children. It makes no sense to put up a fight if we have no future and without children we have no future.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
Hypergamy only selects for things women like, not things that may or may not be useful.
Sexual selection is only 1 part of natural selection, and in fact is usually less important than environmental pressures. This is why the guppy example is good, b/c it illustrates that sexual selection is often at odds with or in balance with environmental selection. When environmental pressures are removed, fischerian runaway can occur, which is the worst case of unchained sexual selection.
Sexual selection is the most important part of natural selection since without it the other traits never even get the chance to be selected for or against.
You apparently do not understand what fitness means in the context of natural selection.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
You have a delusion in your head that systems critique = giving up.
You're just illiterate.
"Illiterate?" hahaha.
You use systems critique as an excuse to not even try. That's all it is for you. A reason why you don't have what you want. You have to take steps and earn what you want.
No one is going to mail you a wife like WASP used to want people to do.
Things are crazy right now but it's going to take a lot longer to change the system than it will to change yourself. If you want access to women these days then you have to do something to set yourself apart from all the others.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
You're not reading what I'm writing Gabe, and if you are you don't understand it.
You're not writing anything that makes sense in this context.
Eugenics is selecting for desirable traits like when they would castrate retarded people 100 years ago.
Hypergamy does this although some people slip through the cracks since not everyone with money earned it legitimately.
There will always be exception and outliers. I'm just trying to get him to get over his pity party and not give up.
He is a pretentious asshole online but I know he has some redeeming qualities and would make a better parent than many of the parents today.
As long as he doesn't give up that is.
nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
Gabe is attempting to assert hypergamy is eugenic, unsuccessfully.
Hypergamy is eugenics. You're just mad/jealous/whatever that your traits (being a whiner and a quitter) aren't what is being selected for.
Hypergamy states that most all of the women go for the top percentage of men (men that have desirable traits for women which is looks, resources, or a combination of the two) and that some or many men get left out. This means men born without good looks, men not smart enough to make decent money, or men without a combination of the two will have less success in having children.
Men who give up will have no success in having children.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk
I've presented more backing for anything I've said here than you, without attempting to psychologize you.
You cannot make a "natural selection" based argument without opening yourself up to literature on "natural selection."
Charles Darwin is one of if not the leading figure on natural selection since he wrote the book titled "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life."
The basic premise is that the more viable offspring you have (offspring that can survive to reproduce again) the fitter you are.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
The supply isn't the issue, selection is. Last I checked there was no demographic shortage of mid women.
And who are those "mid women" choosing?
Either guys with great looks, a lot of money, or an acceptable combination of the two.
This means those without those traits will have less access to breed or not breed at all thus removing them from the gene pool.
Those who give up will 100% be removed from the gene pool.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y
Attempting to analogize our current era to something like famine misses the point in a manner expected of a peddler of r/k in 2023.
A famine is a time without enough or a time without surplus.
Would you say that there isn't enough average women for average men these days or is there a surplus?
"Resources" come in all kinds of types.
nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk
The truth of the thing itself is independent of who says it. Nothing you've said in this post rebuts, refutes or otherwise solidifies your position against my critique. In fact you've merely solidified my point that the issue is environmental.
You would be in a better position positing that studies on guppies aren't applicable to humans, albeit in doing so undermining r/k analysis (something typically used in cross species analysis).
I did mention that guppies aren't applicable to humans when I said you cherry picked stuff that would try and prove your silly argument wrong to save face on the internet.
All you have ever wanted to do is feel sorry for yourself. If you're that big of a fucking loser then do it. I still think you might have some redeeming quality that you could capitalize on but if you're going to give up and try and get pity from everyone then we didn't need you anyway.