Could you provide the evidence for this statement please? I'm curious what methodology was used to rate "excellent" and "average", as well as "value", and what those "relative terms" are.

For me personally it's the intent that matters, and not what is said. I'm afraid that we're locking ourselves into a communication anxiety this way, where we can't ask or talk stuff without fear of offense, when we really intend no harm at all.

Most people are good people. Let's not escalate misunderstandings, and live a more care-free life.

I'm a guest here for now. Testing the waters. Looking for a bubble-free world where I'd interact with people from all social circles, with as little aggravating rhetoric as possible.

That's the thing: it doesn't need to be like that! We're doing something really wrong if everything is so aggravating but the actual consequences in real life are tested by your experience, and appear to be zero. So why are we focusing on content that makes us feel so alarmed, when it has very little to do with us, and has no consequences on our lives? We ruin relationships over it too!