I like 里 as an alternate symbol for sats. It is read "sato" generally. Not proposing to change the generally accepted symbol though don't worry lok
I came up with quite a few in my head, just didn't write them out here. The possibilities are wildly open, I know.
There's even way more than these kanji as possibilities, I only selected the ones I liked the most. Pretty interesting problem!
A truly wise person can spot the people who so easily choose violence, and refuse to put their eggs in that basket or let them co-opt the systems he has built.
Looked up the possible kanji that could be used to spell Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi «敏士» : Clever gentleman (or just 敏 : Clever)
Nakamoto «中本» : Ubiquitous ongoing ledger
or perhaps...
Satoshi «里次» : Red light district next
Nakamoto «中元» : Already pouring the foundation
#SatoshiNakamoto #Bitcoin #NameMeanings
Useful for those of us with multiple personalities!
Humanity is definitely a bit of both. I for one am not a barbarian. Most of nostr is pretty civilized. I guess you could argue we're not human! Haha
nostr:npub18hdy2qy2qwga0ye7rtnucwuyf07erjfdmm7s74wwdt7sy4mk7tdsdd8059 is an excellent source of peptides and triglycerides.
I’m dying of unceasing laughter
Thank you!
nostr:nprofile1qqswp94gnm4epqsgjkndl4lnd8krzdj5u4mzuppdtxksdymkty63g7gpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsz9mhwden5te0ve5kcar9wghxummnw3ezuamfdejsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9e3k76twdaeju6t0tdc7a2 hodlbutter is bitcoiner nutella. High quality, low time preference, not too sweet, and goes great with honey!! Hodl!!
People obsessing over how helpful AIs can potentially become, meanwhile I'm over here, a human robot like
🤖 Am I a joke to you?
This might also be one of the reasons that I can see right through LLMs as nothing close to generalist artificial intelligence, while other people are like,
"Is this... The Singularity?" 🦋
Bunch of gobbledygook for bankers and warmongers to shirk responsibility and let socialist useful idiots regurgitate it.
https://reason.com/2025/07/14/u-n-report-blames-israel-and-capitalism-for-the-conflict-in-gaza/
This sounds similar to a concept I formed about it all in my limited understanding. Really cool to see.
The three laws of robotics were always flawed. What is needed in place of them are the nonaggression principle, a concept of guardianship, and self awareness of epistemological limitations.
#threelaws #robotics #robotrights #sapientmachine
This looks promising!! Started reading it, but kinda busy, saving it for later!
Relatable. Way too relatable. I thought I was gonna be fired last week.
“Wouldn't it be a cosmic mindfuck if fusion becomes a thing to generate cheap electricity for bitcoin mining and one of the byproducts is gold is produced? Dual-mining?”
https://stacker.news/items/1037024/r/halalmoney?commentId=1037185
Now that's what I call bimetallism!!
That kind of shit comes from Marxists and usurpers intentionally being dishonest. It is additionally spread by gullible people who use fallacy instead of reason. Useful idiots.
Europa The Last Battle Part 8: The Holocaust
Have fun, kids!
https://blossom.primal.net/8ba8e2365f66f5eab3862eae79124c8396e17c90166beeec3231567fabb4dfad.mp4
Hmm, what do you think, chat? Was Nazi mass murder of Jews in concentration camps a fabrication by Soviets and communist controlled media to shift blame away from the U.S.S.R., and a convenient scapegoat to cover up mistaken bombings of concentration camps carried out by the Allies? Or was there really a Holocaust perpetrated by Nazis (in addition to the Soviet slaughterings) just with fewer than 6 million deaths? What incentive would the Nazis have to kill such a large slave labor force? It does seem suspicious. But I really don't know. All I know is fuck the state, all states lie, and communists and Nazis alike are quick to shift the blame, not unlike statist Americans who believe in collective guilt.
I'm in favor of animal testing. For example, I want to try a natural remedy for my dog who's having eye problems well of course naturally I wanted to test that it's safe, so I tried it on my eyes just now. It's safe 👍
Animal testing on the rational animal.
It's the Department of Just Us™
Like absolutely certain. Generally just don't bet the whole house on much of anything, it's so stupid.
They only thing you'll regret is you didn't watch it more
https://video.nostr.build/5df788c7413100f0d7a8da181aa0984b8afa267cce6d464bf7a52cb94db72f76.mp4
:funkycat_sm::funkycat_sm::funkycat_sm::funkycat_sm::funkycat_sm:
I loved it lol
Many normie NPCs think it seems wise and nuanced to say "You shouldn't use current standards to judge the merits and morality of people and systems from another time."
It has a certain plausible applicability stemming from the incommensurability of one situation with another without a defined and appropriate standard where comparison is useful or valid. In light of the many various value systems, strategies for attaining goals, and extant or relevant needs which are all in a sense subjective, it could very well be the case that a standard cannot be applied or at least that we should be careful not to naively apply it. However, normies are wayyy too quick to presume that we are in one of these situations wherein application is impossible or not worth out time, and discard any intellectual endeavors this direction out of hand.
When normies do this and assert the aforementioned assertion as a given, it implicitly presumes a number of things that are not always true or applicable to the inspection at hand. To begin with, it presumes that the standards in question are not universal and constant, that we are speaking only in terms of relative merits and demerits by some arbitrary, subjective standard. Next, it presumes that the particulars relevant to understanding the merit or morality of the person or thing in question are either (A) unknowable for all cases or (B) decidedly, systematically and for all cases, known to be of such a nature as to render the thing or person in question immune from the methods of inspection and of imputing values which are in use today, which is not immediately apparent and is lacking any logical justification of pragmatic use as a heuristic, let alone as a true and appropriate assertion, epistemological rule, or rule to supplement a value system.
This is made far, far worse when we are clearly talking about universal facts such as "to seek to enslave a man is bad," and that is met with the same old "well we shouldn't judge old cases with today's standard." Indeed if that is your way of thinking, your standard, we shouldn't judge anything at all by your standard! Your philosophy is shit! The very notion of (and efficacy of carrying out) objective morality itself is under attack by this bland, useless NPC script propagating about. Through its utterance, rule by fiat is quietly, sneakily affirmed, and the masses keep themselves from reasoning out any relevant truths.
So no, fuck you and fuck your different times different standards bullshit. Lysander Spooner will always be a motherfuckin' badass, Abraham Lincoln will always be a racist tyrant, and Alexander Hamilton will always be a central banker, "necessary and proper" grifter. These things are just true. If this rings true to you, tell a normie to shut the fuck up and try thinking for himself about it next time he utters this nonsense.
What a pathetic loser.
Man and I thought I liked Julia. I dare not turn the sound on, that's just bullshit, I can tell already. Yeah it's hard to be an American woman for most of them because it's hard to be AMERICAN because we're being stolen from every day and nothing functions right. That's about it.
Anyway I'm sleepy and rambling, GN, lol
I suddenly feel the need to learn survival tips/makeshift stove designs, for some unknown reason.
This makes me want to replay the Survivor Lara Tomb Raider trilogy.
Jameson LARP can go fork himself right off.
GM! If you live in the Los Angeles area, Jack FM is so fun & goofy to listen to sometimes. "Hey, spendy McSpenderson, looky here!" just before Jacktivities. The narrator makes a lot of vaguely libertarian/dgaf about politics comments too, and it's so refreshing sometimes.
Shut up! The music nerds are talking!
The UNIX philosophy of food 🤌
