Avatar
lkraider
3e0f744d54acee8e2c7fea0be2c4cf99c089a4faa83ff7ccc3d0d9f1b59a3463

Foi rsrs, mas nem ficou comigo o presente, ja tinha sido resgatado

Já descobri que o pior é ficar consumindo muito conteúdo influencer online, eles vivem de gerar medo e ansiedade por views. Não sofrer por antecipação é muito importante, e o desespero é um sentimento não-Cristão, muito explorado pelo demônio.

My grandma lived to 95 and cooked in aluminum or teflon pans all her life. Not saying that’s optimal, but for now my worry is much more on pesticides, herbicides or other elements on the food itself.

Progresso como utilizado hoje, principalmente de forma moderna secular, é um termo ambíguo, pois depende do objetivo a que se propõe.

Assumo aqui que está colocando em termos de quando existe conflito entre o objetivo a que se propõe o progresso quando ele não está alinhado com “O Bem”, ou à Deus. Pois nesse caso existiria sacrifício do que é o bem maior por algo menor.

Pois bem, acredito que a definição de progresso sem outra qualificação deveria pressupor sempre o bem maior, e ser utilizada com um qualificador quando não for voltada desta forma. Por exemplo: “progresso tecnico” poderia ter conflito de objetivo, pois coloca a ordem tecnológica acima da ordem divina.

Quando progresso é ordenado ao bem divino, a moral se cumpre por condição necessária, e deixa de haver conflitos entre o progresso e o que é correto aos olhos de Deus, por definição.

seems like a weird remark, is it any different from anyone that is not a DIY person? or current consumption culture? most people don’t know how to do most mundane tasks today either.

Esses dias pesquisei sobre a história desse poster. Sabia que ele muda entre as temporadas do Arquivo X? A foto original é dos anos 70.

Falhou o “grande evento” organizado pela Mossad

Não é uma frase de Einstein.

O simbolismo do ouroboros contrastando com a linha reta, presume que “tudo” está contido em si próprio. Eu, ao invés disso, contrastaria com o símbolo da cruz, onde a linha reta é atravessada pelo transcendente, onde ao invés da linha tentar se auto-consumir para criar a ideia do infinito, ela se abre a receber o que realmente é acima dela, onde o todo não se resume a si mas se abre.

Is this used to always encode the same image? Otherwise the hardcoded CRC values for the PNG will not match for arbitrary pixels, I believe?

Replying to Avatar aljaz

#meme

This is a weird logic puzzle.

1. Is it implying that strong men are watching weak men take charge? Then they are not strong men.

2. Or is it implying weak men are watching other weak men creating hard times?

In all cases the men watching are to blame.

The equating is not one to one, but becomes clearer when described:

- novels: imaginary examples to force specific situations and postulate on the outcomes

- myths and stories: patterns of reality that apply at levels at or above a single human life, exemplified in a language that can be understood instinctively if not rationally

- llms: responses that tend to the average cluster of information related to that concept as described in the training data

Local loyalty discount. Makes sense to me.

Ah sim, se quiser invocar Lucifer é isso mesmo.

Replying to Avatar OgFOMK ArTS

Good Morning.

I was speaking with a family friend yesterday. The friend could not accept that all men were not good. I specifically said, evil. I said that all of us are by nature evil. The friend would not accept this.

---

Matthew 19:16-22

Mat 19:16-22 KJV “¶ And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

17. And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

18. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,

19. Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

20. The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?

21. Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.

22. But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions.”

---

If we think we are good and other men are evil then we put ourselves into the position of believing that our actions will bring our salvation. Some would say that we are self sovereign. We are not. We are through the blood of Jesus Christ sanctified and forgiven but our carnal bodies are evil and we will lose them eventually.

---

Romans 6:20-23

Rom 6:20-23 KJV “For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness.

21. What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? for the end of those things is death.

22. But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.

23. For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.”

---

Us in Bitcoin might think that our treasure does not rust, moths corrupt and thieves can steal but our corpse is that which will be taken and the treasure is no good which is obfuscated, hidden, stolen or worshipped. In spiritual misery without Christ we lose anyway.

---

Matthew 6:19-21

Mat 6:19-21 KJV “¶ Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:

20. But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:

21. For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also...”

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

#Bitcoin

#Treasure

#Bible

#Gospel

#Jesus

#Christ

#GM

Humanism and Secularism places Man first, the Pride of Man will not allow him to see transcendental Truth, and will place all Good as emanating from himself.

Unfortunately it is a failed philosophy book.