The problem with this argument is that it relies on a No True Scotsman fallacy. Every time capitalismās outcomes are criticized, the response is that we do not live under true capitalism. The system that actually exists is always treated as an aberration rather than the logical result of capitalist incentives operating over time.
The bureaucratic monopolistic society you describe is not a corruption external to capitalism. It is capitalism doing exactly what it is structurally incentivized to do. Capitalismās defining objective is not serving people. It is profit maximization. Selling something for more than it costs to produce. That incentive does not stop at the market boundary. Firms rationally seek to reduce competition, shape rules in their favor, raise barriers to entry, and externalize costs such as healthcare, labor, education and environmental damage.
When capital accumulates, the most efficient way to protect profit is no longer innovation. It is political influence.This is not socialism. It is regulatory capture, a phenomenon extensively documented in mainstream economics. Industries systematically capture regulators to serve profit and shareholder interests rather than the public. Public Choice Theory explains how private actors use the state to entrench economic advantage. Peer reviewed research has repeatedly linked market concentration to lobbying power and weakened competition and demonstrates that capital concentration naturally converts into political power unless it is actively countered.
The regulations you are pointing to are not anti capitalist constraints imposed from outside the system. They are capitalist behaviors expressed through the state. Capital does not invade government accidentally. It does so because it is profitable.
This is why food insecurity and healthcare failures exist inside wealthy capitalist nations. Healthcare markets optimize for revenue rather than outcomes as documented by the World Health Organization and the Commonwealth Fund. Food systems prioritize shareholder value resulting in both massive waste and widespread hunger. Market choice disappears when industries consolidate, something the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice openly acknowledge has accelerated.
Saying real capitalism would wipe out big business ignores history. Unregulated capitalism has never remained competitive for long. It tends toward monopoly because scale, capital accumulation, and political leverage are competitive advantages. If capitalism were self correcting, it would not require perpetual bailouts, repeated antitrust interventions, or constant state support to prevent collapse. The fact that it does is evidence that the outcomes being criticized are not a deviation from capitalism but its mature form. Capitalism concentrated wealth beyond our imaginations. We live in a post scarcity environment where victims of capitalism and socio economic factors alike keep hundreds of millions unhoused, hungry and sick while the capitalist owners, that by nature produce nothing (proof of work) and only extract value through rent seeking behaviors, enjoy socialist benefits provided by and extracted from the workers that produce all of the things of value that we use. Itās become very common for the capitalist to rage against socialism while they enjoy all of our socialist benefits and initiatives while insisting that the rest of society must stick to raw unfettered capitalism. Itās also very common now for uneducated and ill informed workers to defend capitalism and vote against their own self interest as well. Capitalism only favors those who have breached a certain threshold of accumulation which is only achieved and made possible through extortion of the worker.
Oh you talkin bout that proof of work
While a group of capitalists blames the family
The capitalists get the overwhelming majority of resources and wealth generated by the working class. Then they give a portion of their ill gotten gains to the politicians that made the transfer possible and the cycle continues over and over. Natalie is not a capitalist she is a worker that hasnāt realized there are only 2 types of participants in this economic order.
Republicans have been crying for years about their victimhood. There are hundreds but you can see a great example of it in Nancy Mace. Sheās 100% pure republican victim of everything just like many of them.
Republicans run on a platform that rich ppl should receive payments because theyāre too big to fail or that theyāre job creators. They've made an entire hierarchy to rate people by race and gender and sexual identity and other demographic factors. I'm literally talking about a defined contest. They are throwing around the idea to make antisemitism a crime which in effect is holding one demographic above another. If you claim shenanigans on one side donāt close your eyes to the shenanigans of the other.
Iād rather distribute reparations to the deserving or even better UBI across the board than cut taxes for the wealthy or bail out corporations that lobby for handouts. And of course working people are going to spend the money that they are allocated. They must in order to survive. No need for a āstudyā. Also no need for a study to know that the trillions we gave rich folks stayed in their pocket too. They didnāt need it but they use it to acquire capital and rent it back to us.
Trying to sell some profundity thatās never even been in stock
When the alternative is starvation and homelessness thereās not much of a choice is there?
I always thought you were just a naive bag of douche that showed up on various podcasts and panels for weak comic relief over the years. Stay in your lane. Youāre the court jester not the cleric.
The primate skulls are evidence that support the theory not proof. The canine skulls are the result of extremely recent selective breeding by humans. What is this meme trying to convey?
Iām fully aware of bitcoin and what it is. Iāve also read saifdeans bitcoin standard I believe right when it came out. I enjoyed it. Especially the bits about the history of money and its nature as a technology.
Unfortunately though, I feel the same way about your perspective. I defended capitalism for decades until I couldnāt anymore. Iāve also considered the argument that our current environment isnāt true capitalism. While I understand where it comes from I still see it as an appeal to purity.
If I remember correctly Ammous characterizes rent seeking behaviors as a negative feature of fiat which I agree with. However rent seeking is not exclusive to fiat currencies. Bitcoin is superior to gold in almost every way but gold is still a good money and most bitcoiners know itās long history. That history includes gold as payment for rent. Itās clear to me that this rent seeking is not only enabled by capitalistic behavior but encouraged. Rent seeking and profit motives at the cost of workers is a feature of capitalism. You may find it ironic that understanding bitcoins proof of work mechanism is one of the main reasons that I now see capitalism for what it is. It inspires the non worker (capitalist) to extort the labor (proof of work) of the worker. It depends on extracting wealth from others.
The period between WW2 and the 70ās saw a shrinking wealth gap brought about by a hybrid economy of capitalism under a high amount of government regulation as well as strong labor unions. Reaganās administration destroyed both of those driving forces that mitigated the rampant inequality of capitalism and now we see a wealth divide that seems like the gilded age 2.0.
The proliferation of fiat may very well have been the last nail in the coffin but at best capitalism exacerbated it but I suspect it is actually responsible for pushing us in the coffin in the first place. I do not refute that there a few benefits to capitalism, but the same is true for other economic systems like socialism and communism as well. The benefits definitely do not outweigh the costs. I donāt claim to have an answer for a replacement of our current structure but Iām quite certain I will never defend capitalism again.
Oh yikes indeed
Yeah Iāll do the simple work for you here. Does it hurt?
He absolutely said that before this interview and the interviewer was giving him a chance to correct himself but as TACO Trump has also said before āmy father told me to never admit youāre wrong no matter what.
Now youāre blaming central governments for things brought to you by the race to the bottom capitalist goods and services. I live paying more for shittier stuff to keep the shareholders pockets lined for creating absolutely no proof of work at all
I say Jesus fucking Christ all of the time. Probably has more to do with where I was born because Iāve yet to encounter any evidence whatsoever that any god exists. Lucky you to be born where the one true god is the most popular out of the thousands
Youre saying a person canāt examine one of the thousands of religious doctrines of the world without believing it first. Analyze that
People leave and change religions everyday. Divorce rates are pretty high. And people get tattoos removed all of the time. I donāt know though. Maybe you get sick of the political influence and corruption. Maybe you become the victim of environmental degradation. Maybe you realize the rampant income inequality. Maybe you get tired of the monopolies and oligopolies. The encouragement of consumerism and very high time preferences is a good reason not to as well. One of the most detrimental effects is the exploitation of labor and rent seeking behaviors. These cause the most class division. There are certainly benefits to enjoy that result from capitalism but when people make it part of their identity itās like they lose the ability to be critical of it.
Why do these guys always equate non capitalist to communist? It seems to be the most popular false dichotomy regarding the subject. If you challenge their religion they resort to boomer proverbs and Red Scare tactics.
āAlways willā is such a bizarre addition

