Geez, you act like they're the CEO of Coinbase 😂

I hope all of them join the mile-high club ✈️

It's perfect. 💯💯 Thanks again!

Thank you, I guess I had misunderstood it. I haven't forked any posts yet. I believe I was confusing it with the "propose an edit"?

Appreciate everything you do.

Sorry, wrong note.

nostr:nevent1qqszet0vfjgzyfs5l364lypmxdyujrje8e7z8q4nk8vz4l3u4gkvhpcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvupzq5yqnffla72eq3gn4pqdgzp2j269e403h8jrdkwjhy4gnnsfrutyqvzqqqqqqy6htptd

At this rate you have my vote

Lists are the foundation of organized information. Any property added to a list created a unique kind of a list. From what I gather there has always been a fear of NIP-51 becoming bloated. However personally I believe that NIP-51 will become the foundation for all of the Nostr ecosystem and the bloat will instead become regarded as valuable kinds of lists. We should embrace the work put in so far to determine the importance of other NIPs first. Lists are a complicated matter at the end of the day because they can be leveraged to any extent, in any context, at any level of the ecosystem. There is no one-size-fits-all kind of list. How lists are employed is a matter of how relays operate. So, I think we now have a framework for sharing and leveraging simple lists.

We can now move on to Listr, a protocol for sharing and creating unique kinds of lists. This would interoperate with Nostr.

We can move on to complex lists.

And we can move on to Graphstr.

Check out my other reply here:

nostr:nevent1qqs2eg4jesueskvzlumcrzw92ep03rd02mz48k73hp4pqx23rn6j2dqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvupzq5yqnffla72eq3gn4pqdgzp2j269e403h8jrdkwjhy4gnnsfrutyqvzqqqqqqym956g9

Pocket dev

nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z

Is there any plan for "reposting" or cloning of notes? Boost is wonderful for engagement but doesn't allow for the creation of a new discussion. It only allows users to comment on the original note. If I want to share this Alan Watts quote, I would have to quote the note or boost it. Why not repost? Reposting is what keeps Reddit alive and there is no karmic incentive here. However there is the consideration of stealing content for zaps but I am not sure that is hindered by a lack of a repost feature. I could just as easily plagiarize the note but it would make sense for this feature to be native to a social media censorship-resistant network.

I feel bad for all of the tagging so I may submit this request on GitHub eventually. I feel like it must have been discussed somewhere.

Gm Vitor.

I have been considering this for a very long time, of course how it relates to Nostr I have only been considering for the two years that I have been a part of the ecosystem.

I see two problems that are very noticeable on Nostr. The first being a lack of "organized friend lists" and the second being a lack of "managed communities".

Both of these properties are enhanced with a centralized database of course, while Nostr is enhanced with the emergent properties that are derived from the "all seeing relays" model encouraged by Blastr.

I actually like the Blastr model if it is applied in a way that creates value and incentive structures. It's just that no one wants to host everyone's bloat notes (for free) if the cost is compounding upwards. Relays lose incentive. Instead of proliferating, they become constrained.

So what I suggest is a forking of Nostr.

Our npubs can be shared across different forms of Nostr which can become frameworks for different network relationship models.

In this way we can manage "Other Stuff" without being a slave to the kind 1 note and NIP-02 Follow List format.

I think a fully "decentralized" Nostr would be a fully distributed Nostr. That means every user would have incentive to host their own relay. This makes sense if we can reduce the footprint of "Nostr A" to something microscopic. If Nostr's identity layer can proliferate to become a standard that is built into every home router, then we can maximize the proliferation of npubs.

nostr:npub1w4jkwspqn9svwnlrw0nfg0u2yx4cj6yfmp53ya4xp7r24k7gly4qaq30zp suggests hosting data in clusters of friend groups. He wants friends to share encrypted data between themselves directly as a form of redundant personal security. I like this model and think it could also serve as a model for relays. Relays need to organize. In this way, we can maintain different frameworks for standardizations of data interoperability without being committed to any single organizational structure.

The thought here is that I should be hosting my own personal relay to host my own notes. If I cannot, then I should be able to find a public relay which would likely make sense to be a decaying type of relay. Do we have relays that decay yet? I would love to publish to a relay that guarantees my note will decay in 1 year, for example.

Then I have the authority as a user to determine how long I want to host a note, or how long someone else should host it. It can proliferate and be guided by social peers, but in the end I shouldn't be writing permanently to anywhere unless I want it to be there forever. Which is not everything I say, necessarily. And most of my "thoughts and celebrations and memes" don't really need to proliferate across the internet, so much as they need a home to exist upon until I decide to delete them.

It makes sense to have small personal relays and it makes sense to have totally open relays.

What doesn't make sense is confining ourselves to "one Nostr". Even if it is open, it is still constrained by its organization. The employment of Nostr is dependent on its structure.

So, "relay organization" is not set in stone either. But at first we should have a simple Peer-to-Peer relay authority structure.

A relay would either be open to everyone, or it would federate with a group of other relays.

Because these federated relays would all be sharing the same goal, they would not be less decentralized than Nostr is now. Instead they would provide authority structure within this decentralized ecosystem. This would allow parent/child relay relationships. The point is that relays would communicate but they would only do so by grouping and agreeing to read/write to each other. By Blasting events to each other.

You have "relay networks" which are totally decentralized and stand alone

You have "hybrid applications" which employ caching to aggregate data from relays

And you have "social networks" which are unique in structure and dependent on user input

What we don't have is trustless relay organization.

And then we need a new Nostr for Blastr-enabled Nostr and this one can become testnet Nostr.

Or inbox/outbox/gossip Nostr.

Why aren't there already like 5 versions of Nostr? All models are valid, it's a question of application and incentive and structure.

I am not sure how well I can format these concepts but I hope this comment is helpful in some way. I believe Nostr is attempting to do something that money cannot solve. Developers must break through to innovative ideas instead of relying on traditional fundamentals. We are in emergent territory. Light speed connectivity. There are new rules to be written.

With that, I also want to suggest Graphstr, which would be "the beginning of Web of Trust or as I've taken to calling it, Web of Confidence". Graphstr would be a relay backend powered by Blazegraph with a Rust wrapper to communicate Nostr events across a decentralized protocol of Blazegraph relays. This would enable concept graphs to proliferate across a Nostr-enabled ecosystem, which could serve as a model for a future decentralized Web of Trust.

Heck if I know. nostr:npub1yx6pjypd4r7qh2gysjhvjd9l2km6hnm4amdnjyjw3467fy05rf0qfp7kza I want Listr to become a protocol and not just a Nostr application.

The bros casually golfing in front of an inferno mountain of trees is metal as hell

Crying in the CornyClub with my Gucci shades on

The main thing I noticed is that the last thing I explored was the "learn more" section. I think its placement could be better for mobile users who are less likely to reach to the top of the page for further details. Not sure I understand the last question "what made you return back to social media?"

I been working 😭😭😭

I'd sob if I lost all my Vic pics

Why can't I make it through one fucking shift without seeing shit like this

I couldn't see any other users and I could hear you but also I'm working RN so I had to bail 😭

Why did I read this in nostr:npub1ymt2j3n8tesrlr0yhaheem6yyqmmwrr7actslurw6annls6vnrcslapxnz's voice, ew.

Myself, nostr:npub1yx6pjypd4r7qh2gysjhvjd9l2km6hnm4amdnjyjw3467fy05rf0qfp7kza and nostr:npub18pudjhdhhp2v8gxnkttt00um729nv93tuepjda2jrwn3eua5tf5s80a699 at 3am

nostr:nevent1qqs886nzf9qnpxqpkkhxxx3as7k6sf7y50xl78mzavywkxf6yw5cl3qpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzpzjylt9n9a8vkckcs42my244mfsh3h6a4nvz2750ncdzz9r3qv6xqvzqqqqqqyat2l37

Classic Nostr, devs are always working on useless shit like doorbell chimes instead of fixing everyone's first-world problems. Such bullshit honestly. I want a refund on my zaps.

Sounds like an opportunity for unique marketing proposals.

I'll try:

*Guy standing at a Bitcoin ATM*

*Attractive woman approaches*

Miss: Oh, are you buying a Bitcoin right now?

Man: Yes, of course, decentralized money is the future of finance!

Miss: That's so true! Do you have an npub?

Man: Of course! Everyone uses Mutiny!

Then they get married of course.

Would make a sick commercial. Maybe sponsor with a jewelry company and show them geotagging their wedding with a Nostr note.

Then they zap the priest I guess 😂