Try the assassineria
You realize that he wasn't her son, right?
nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg
nostr:npub10wv37amdqnv8edw5yktgsxr62g8k4lqkk2u66fk6c6uwuakzssxsf4v22x
No, you can't take them, you can only enforce them or violate them
"They" are really only one: property
Again, the right of property comes from the nature of man in the universe and the nature of interactions between persons
Rights are obligations on others. They come from two beings each recognizing the other as a subject, or end, in themselves rather than just an object
Blockchains simply don't scale, another layer is necessary if you want to keep any kind of blockchain base layer
Eh, when you call it FUD ... was a good article though
Self-sufficient...transacting ... does not compute
One easy way to scale Bitcoin is to rely on intermediaries. In fact, Lightning is pretty much exactly that
I actually kinda like monero, but there are a few possible problems people have with it.
1. Tail emission. This is probably the biggest problem maxis have with monero, I think it's overblown, it's a constant tail emission, not percentage based.
2. Verification of the actual number of coins in existence. One can't see the balance of accounts, so one can't verify this. Again, I don't consider this a huge problem, as this is also true of gold. However, maybe there was a pre-mine we don't know about.
3. Tribalism, fear, etc. They're heavily invested in Bitcoin and don't want any competition. I think there is space for a few different coins, Bitcoin probably always being the biggest, but Bitcoin and Monero are complementary until Bitcoin has a very fast, cheap, high tps and private layer 2.
The best time to buy Bitcoin was 10 years ago, the second best time is today, every day
No, I'm saying coins can scale to as many people as there are: billions of transactions per second. Every person on earth can give their partner a coin at the same time
Ledgers are key to scaling money, but they require trust in a central authority. On the other hand, coins and cash don't require trust but are limited in their scalability. Bitcoin solves this by providing a decentralized ledger that can scale infinitely without relying on intermediaries or permission from centralized authorities. This revolutionary feature of Bitcoin not only makes it more secure than traditional payment methods, but also able to handle an infinitely higher volume of transactions through its blockchain technology. It's clear that Bitcoin represents a quantum leap forward when we compare it with previous forms of money issuance and transmission created by humans.#bitcoin #blockchainscaling
https://youtu.be/d7ID3fKAFQM?si=C_gdMSeNtJ3GHCRG
#FollowMeNostr
No. Coins and cash are enormously scalable in the sense of transactions per second. They can have problems in long distance or large value transactions - where ledgers and clearing operations can be useful.
Bitcoin does not solve the transactions per second problem. This will require a layer 2, or Bitcoin notes, to solve ... assuming one uses Bitcoin as the base layer.
A lot of Austrians are very suspicious of mathematical models of the kind you see in a lot of forecasting methods, what's different here?
I agree, but be the change you want to see ... we do need more content
Computerphile on YT has some decent overviews on this. It really depends on what you're trying to compress and whether or not it can be lossy
Use what you want, but proof of stake means the first owners can always keep late comers out. Proof of work means that the protocol is literally open to all.
Premiering, in particular, is just a get rich quick scheme