Avatar
Lau
5a9c48c8f4782351135dd89c5d8930feb59cb70652ffd37d9167bf922f2d1069
#bitcoin #nostr

Basically 3rd kyu, after all 10 kyus you can try for your 1st dan. 🥋

Replying to Avatar Melvin Carvalho

## **Why Nostr Will Win**

*The rise of decentralized social networks and the promise of Nostr.*

Sep 18, 2023

> "The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson

The current digital landscape, replete with centralization, has seen the emergence of a new contender: Nostr, a decentralized social network protocol. While many are quick to dismiss decentralized systems, believing the comfort of central platforms to be irreplaceable, Nostr's rise suggests otherwise.

#### **Nostr's Foundation: Decentralization at Its Finest**

*“It's not the strongest species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the most responsive to change.” - Charles Darwin*

At its core, Nostr is built on principles that are shaking the very foundations of traditional social networking:

1. **User Sovereignty**: Nostr hands the reins of data back to its rightful owner - the user. This is a stark contrast to the data monopolies of today's centralized platforms.

2. **Immutable and Transparent**: With Nostr, data is transparently stored, ensuring users can trust the integrity of the content and its origins.

3. **Modular and Flexible**: Nostr isn't a one-size-fits-all. Its modular design means it can be tailored to suit various needs, making it adaptable and future-proof.

#### **The Power of the Community**

*“Individual commitment to a group effort - that's what makes a team work, a company work, a society work, a civilization work.” - Vince Lombardi*

Nostr isn't just a technology; it's a movement:

1. **Organic Growth**: Nostr's community-driven approach ensures that it evolves based on user needs rather than corporate interests.

2. **Collaborative Security**: The decentralized nature of Nostr means security is a collective responsibility, leading to more robust and reliable systems.

3. **Open Source Advantage**: With its open-source roots, Nostr benefits from the collective genius of developers worldwide, ensuring rapid innovation and improvement.

#### **Breaking the Shackles of Centralization**

*“Innovation is the unrelenting drive to break the status quo and develop anew where few have dared to go.” - Steven Jeffes*

Nostr's rise is a clear signal of a paradigm shift:

1. **Interoperability**: Nostr promotes a world where platforms can seamlessly interact, breaking the silos created by centralized giants.

2. **Economic Fairness**: Without centralized entities monetizing user data, Nostr ushers in a new economic model where value is equitably distributed.

3. **Censorship-resistant**: Nostr ensures that the voice of the user is not stifled by centralized algorithms or corporate agendas.

#### **The Road Ahead**

As with any emergent technology, challenges lie ahead for Nostr. However, its foundational principles, coupled with a passionate community, position it favorably in the evolving digital landscape.

In conclusion, Nostr isn't just another platform; it's a beacon for the future of social networking. As the digital realm continues to evolve, Nostr stands tall, promising a world where users are at the center, and data is truly democratized.

Excellent words and form

And for this also, best not try to force things. Market forces will need to guide the process. Any form of intervention is still socialism.

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

Is it just me, or does it seem like everyone is super reluctant to monetize services and relays on #Nostr?

If we can’t make these things sustainable then we will either lose them, or they will stay nothing more than a weird little corner of the internet with lots of hope but no chance of ever scaling.

I still haven’t seen the basic model of zap sharing tried by any major client or relay. But I DO see regularly comments about how expensive relays are. I mean it might not work, but can’t we TRY it?

I want to make the distinction here too that this doesn’t mean we are closing off the network, we are adding permissions to the protocol, this doesn’t suggest at all to used closed source code, we simply need the services necessary to keep this ecosystem robust, to be profitable and have the resources to thrive. If they aren’t, then NONE of this works. Economics is everything.

I know building features is more exciting. I know we all want to make everything that we can free, and I agree all of the *code* should be shared. However, I think there is a natural insecurity (and I say this because I have this problem personally) with charging a fair price, and fearing criticism or the ire of people who believe everything should be free (as in price) when we need things to be free (as in Liberty). They are not the same, and confusing the two could stifle, or drastically slow down, the insane potential of this place.

TL;DR We have GOT to divert some energy to thinking about how to make this ecosystem sustainable, or we will lose it.

(Disclaimer: this isn’t a judgement on whoever is thinking about this problem. It just *seems* like few are. If you are building in this way please share your ideas or what you are trying. I’m extremely interested)

I think the market square is still too small. Once social bandwidth picks up here the ball will start rolling.

The only thing is that you then can't use the funds to buy anything legal with, as a house or a car. But that can be resolved in other ways.

That doesn't matter. Precedence from case law matters. Corruption is always possible, but that doesn't change the case law.

The point is, the jurisprudence following from this marvel of bitcoin the protocol will simply resolve these cases in favor of the hodler before it even comes before the court. No point in trying to prove something that can not be proven.

No they do not. That is an assumption. And again, no judge in any European court will allow this data as proof. They just don't know this yet.

Embezzlement is a felony, it means to illegally take possession of. The opposite is to lose, it means to legally forgo the possession of.

No amount of chain analysis can prove the absolute ownership of bitcoin. If you've been charged you can simply move to another jurisdiction and spend it there without ever moving it. No judge in any court can ever legally prove that you had any bitcoin at the moment of the hearing.

And, if you coinjoin, in person preferably, chain analysis becomes redundant.

With that information they can only indicate that you have owned it at a certain moment in time. Not that you still own it. Embezzlement is illegal, but the opposite isn't.